DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20211124

Analyzing the short term and long-term complication of hysterectomy: a prospective study

Sindhu N. R., Bharathi Divakar Rao, Sabah Mohd. Zubair

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy is the most common surgical procedure done worldwide in women. Although many studies were done regarding short term complications, long term complications are not very well followed up. The objective of the study is to analyze short term and also long-term complications for the different mode of hysterectomy.

Methods: It was a time-bound hospital-based prospective study which includes all the women who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions in the hospital except women with prior psychiatric, bowel, bladder and sexual dysfunctions. All the patients were followed up for one year using a set of questionnaires to study short term and long-term complications.

Results: No significant difference in short term post-operative complications concerning the mode of hysterectomy except for UTI was more common in vaginal hysterectomy group and haemorrhage in TAH route. Sexual dysfunction was noted even after 1 year of surgery in all modes of hysterectomy. Mild urinary dysfunction found statistically significant even at 1 year follow up in vaginal hysterectomy mode however there was no bothersome urinary dysfunction persistent after one year.

Conclusions: Sexual dysfunction is the most common persistent long-term morbidity following hysterectomy found in the present study.


Keywords


Bowel and bladder dysfunction, Complications of hysterectomy, Psychological dysfunction, Sexual dysfunction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Whiteman MK, Hillis SD, Jamieson DJ, Morrow B, Podgornik MN, Brett KM, et al. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004. American J Obstetr Gynecol. 2008;198(1):34-e1.

Forsgren C, Altman D. Long-term effects of hysterectomy: a focus on the aging patient. Aging Health. 2013;9(2):179-87.

McPherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbert A, Maresh M, Casbard A, Hargreaves J, et al. Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. BJOG: An International J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2004;111(7):688-94.

Reich H, Decaprio J, Mcglynn FR. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5(2):213-6.

Birsen O, Ozban AS, Ozban M, Kuzu MA. Effects of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy on anorectal functions along with quality of life of the patient. African Health Sciences. 2018;18(3):612-22.

Roovers JP, Lakeman MM. Effects of genital prolapse surgery and hysterectomy on pelvic floor function. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn. 2009;1(3):194.

McCracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. The Ulster Medic J. 2006;75(1):54.

Reddy MN, Reddy MR. Comparison of total abdominal, vaginal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. International Surg J. 2016;3(4):2007-11.

Garry R, Fountain J, Mason SU, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ.2004;328(7432):129. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136%2Fbmj.37984.623889.F6

Brown JS, Sawaya G, Thom DH, Grady D. Hysterectomy and urinary incontinence: a systematic review. The Lancet. 2000;356(9229):535-9.

MME Lakeman, CH van der Vaart, JPWR Roovers, A long term prospective study to compareeffects of total abdominal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy on micturition and bowel function. BJOJ. 2011;18, (12):1511-7.

Neumann G, Olesen PG, Hansen V, Lauszus FF, Ljungstrøm B, Rasmussen KL. The short-term prevalence of de novo urinary symptoms after different modes of hysterectomy. International Urogynecol J. 2004;15(1):14-9.

Ellström MA, Åström M, Möller AN, Olsson JH, Hahlin M. A randomized trial comparing changes in psychological well-being and sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003;82(9):871-5.