DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20211102

Prevalence and cesarean rates of immigrant adolescent pregnancies

Özer Birge, Aliye Nigar Serin, İlkan Kayar

Abstract


Background: aim of this study was to compare Syrian migrant adolescent pregnancies and Turkish adolescent pregnancies, who gave birth in Osmaniye State Hospital.

Methods: 22,724 women who gave birth at the Osmaniye State Hospital obstetrics and gynecology department between January 2013 and January 2020 were screened retrospectively. 868 Turkish adolescent pregnant women and 522 Syrian migrant adolescent pregnant women were compared. Whether the differences between Turkish and Syrian adolescents were noteworthy (95% confidence interval) was determined using the independent samples t test and Pearson Chi-Square test with statistical software Minitab (version 16.0, USA).

Results: A total of 22,724 births, including 15,883 Turkish and 6841 Syrian immigrants, were analyzed. The number of Turkish adolescent pregnant women was 868 (5.5%), the number of Syrian adolescent pregnant women was 522 (7.6%), the rate of Syrian adolescent pregnancy was higher. The cesarean rate was observed 36.7% in Turkish adolescent pregnancies and 20.1% in Syrian adolescent pregnants, cesarean rates were significantly higher in Turkish adolescent pregnants (p<0.001). When the total of 1390 (6.1%) adolescent pregnancies were evaluated in Osmaniye, where there were intense migrants and Syrian camp, the cesarean rate was found to be 30.5%, and the birth rate of low birth weight below 2500 gm was 11.1%.

Conclusions: Maternal and fetal complications increase in adolescent pregnancies. War and migration are associated with poor obstetric outcomes in pregnancies. With Syrian immigration, an increase in adolescent pregnancy rate, cesarean rate, and low birth weight rate was observed in the region. For these reasons, studies should be done to prevent Syrian adolescent pregnancies. Social and education support, regular follow-up should be done to improve pregnancy outcomes. Adolescent pregnant women are more likely to have vaginal delivery. Therefore, normal vaginal delivery should be followed unless there is an emergency cesarean indication.


Keywords


Adolescent pregnancy, Cesarean section, Syrian pregnancy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Yoost JL, Hertweck SP, Barnett SN. The effect of an educational approach to pregnancy prevention among high-risk early and late adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:222-7.

Rexhepi M, Besimi F, Rufati N, Alili A, Bajrami S, Ismaili H. Hospital-based study of maternal, perinatal and neonatal outcomes in adolescent pregnancy compared to adult women pregnancy. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(5):760.

Chandra-Mouli V, Camacho AV, Michaud PA. WHO guidelines on preventing early pregnancy and poor reproductive outcomes among adolescents in developing countries. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(5):517-22.

Turkey Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. Ankara, Turkey; 2014. Available from: https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR352/FR352.pdf. Accessed on 23 September 2019.

Chandra PC, Schiavello HJ, Ravi B, Weinstein AG, Hook FB. Pregnancy outcomes in urban teenagers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79:117-22.

Stevens-Simon C, McAnarney ER. Adolescent pregnancy. Gestational weight gain and maternal and infant outcomes. Am J Dis Child. 1992;146:1359-64.

Hoekelman RA. Teenage pregnancy- one of our nation’s most challenging dilemmas. Pediatr Ann. 1993;22:81-2.

Kost K, Maddow-Zimet I. U.S. Teenage Pregnancies, Births And Abortions, 2011: State Trends By Age, Race And Ethnicity. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2016.

Edirne T, Can M, Kolusari A, Yildizhan R, Adali E, Akdag B. Trends, characteristics, and outcomes of adolescent pregnancy in eastern Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;110:105-8.

İmir AG, Çetin M, Balta Ö, Büyükayhan D, Çetin A. Perinatal outcomes of adolescent pregnancies at a university hospital in Turkey. J Turkish-German Gynecol Assoc. 2008;9:71-4.

Aydin D. Adolescent pregnancy and adolescent motherhood. J Anatol Nurs Health Sci. 2013;16:4.

Malabarey OT, Balayla J, Klam SL, Shrim A, Abenhaim HA. Pregnancies in young adolescent mothers: a population-based study on 37 million births. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012;25:98-102.

Şekeroğlu M, Baksu A, İnce Z, Gültekin H, Göker N, Özsoy S. Adolescent and old age pregnants obstetric results. Şişli Etfal Tıp Bülteni. 2009;43:l-7.

Gama SG, Szwarcwald CL, Leal Md M. Theme Filha MM: The pregnancy during adolescence as a risk factor for low birth weight, Brazil. Rev Saude Publica. 2001;35:74-80.

Hagues RJ, Bae D, Wickrama KK. Mediational pathways connecting secondary education and age at marriage to maternal mortality: A comparison between developing and developed countries. Wom Health. 2017;57(2):189-207.

Khwaja SS, Al-Sibai MH, Al-Suleiman SA, El-Zibdeh MY. Obstetric implications of pregnancy in adolescence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(1):57-61.

Ersoy GŞ, Kayar İ, Keser B, Ensari TA, Aytaç H, Çetin F. Obstetric outcomes of adolescent pregnancies in the Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;78(4):97-101.

Zeteroglu S, Şahin I, Gol K. Cesarean delivery rates in adolescent pregnancy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2005;10:119-22.

Serin AN, Kayar I, Birge O, Çetin F, Seyhan Y. Syrian refugees maternal health and perinatal outcome in Turkey: a retrospective population-based study. J Gynaecol Wom Healthcare. 2019;2:105.

İnalöz EY, İngeç M, Yılmaz EP. Evaluation of the effects of adolescent pregnancies on maternal and perinatal outcomes in our region. Mustafa Kemal Üniv Tıp Derg. 2017;8(30):6-14.

Baş EK, Bülbül A, Uslu S, Baş V, Elitok GK, Zubarioğlu U. Maternal characteristics and obstetric and neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies among adolescents. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e919922.