DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210327

Assessment of tubal patency through sono-hysterosalpingography using B-mode and colour Doppler: a comparative study

Bhavini Gupta, Sanjay Pasoria, Madan Manmohan

Abstract


Background: Tubal factors constitute a major proportion of infertility causes, and include disorders affecting one or more components of the fallopian tube. Demonstration of tubal patency using imaging modalities can help lower the rate of invasive diagnosis and management. Hysterosalpingography provides optimal delineation of fallopian tube anatomy, allowing detection of tubal patency, tubal occlusion, and peri-tubal disease. Sonosalpingography with saline infusion was started as an alternative because of its added benefits of structural and morphological abnormality detection.

Methods: Patients referred for primary and secondary infertility were assessed on B-mode ultrasound trans-abdominally, followed by cervical catheterization and trans-vaginal ultrasound. Sterile saline fluid was pushed through the cervix, to use as a contrast medium, and its movement was assessed on B-mode and as a colour Doppler artefact.

Results: B-mode, colour Doppler and presence of free-fluid in pouch of Douglas showed presence of tubal patency in 59.6%, 82.7% and 78.8% cases respectively and presence of bilateral and unilateral tubal block in 60.4%, 17.3% and 21.2% respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of B-mode and colour Doppler is 84.6% and 95.2% respectively.

Conclusions: Sonosalpingography can be used to pin-point the exact location of the tubal block, due to its real-time imaging benefits. Normal saline infusion can be used effectively. Colour Doppler provides higher sensitivity for evaluation of tubal patency and has higher specificity for tubal block. Used in combination, they improve diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of sonosalpingography.


Keywords


B-Mode, Colour Doppler, Diagnostic accuracy, Sonosalpingography, Tubal patency

Full Text:

PDF

References


Mehmood G, Sadia S. Infertility Data of Maternal and Child Health Center, PIMS. J Surg. 2001;21-22:10-3

Unexplained infertility. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Available from: https://www.eshre.eu/Guidelines-and-Legal/Guidelines/Guidelines-in-development/Unexplained-infertility. Last accessed on 23 July 2020.

Dor J, Homburg R, Raban E. An evolution of etiological factors and therapy in 665 infertile couples. Fertil Steril. 1977;28:718-22.

Johnson N, Vandekerckhove P, Watson A, Lilford R, Harada T, Hughes E. Tubal flushing for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005:CD003718.

Panchal S, Nagori C. Imaging techniques for assessment of tubal status. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014;7(1):2-12.

Dessole S, Farina M, Rubattu G, Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, Battista Nardelli G. Side effects and complications of sonohysterosalpingography. Fertil Steril. 2003;80:620-4.

Richman TS, Viscomi GN, deCherney A, Polan ML, Alcebo LO. Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Work in progress. Radiology. 1984;152:507-10.

Randolph JF Jr, Ying YK, Maier DB, Schmidt CL, Riddick DH. Comparison of real-time ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:828-32.

Kore S. Transvaginal sonosalpingography is a simple, cost effective, non-invasive test, which can be used as a screening procedure for assessment of tubal patency in the initial working of infertile women. Dept of Obst Gyn. J Obst Gyn. India April 2000.

Peters AJ, Coulam CB. Hysterosalpingography with colour Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1530-2.

Gurriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, Paoletti AM. The screening of tubal abnormalities in the infertile couple J. Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13:407-11.

Scanlan, Kathleen A. Controversies in sonohysterography: Part II. J Women’s Imag. 2001;3(1):6-7.

Fleischer AC, Vasquez JM, Cullinan JA, Eisenberg E. Sonohysterography combined with sonosalpingography: correlation with endoscopic findings in infertility patients. J Ultrasound Med. 1997;16(6):381-4.

Malhotra N, Malhotra J, Mittal S, Singh A. Sonosalpgigraphy: short review. N J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;1(2):71-73.

Sheth S, Malpani A. Vaginal hysterectomy for the management of menstruation in mentally retarded women. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1991;35:319-21.

Zhou L, Zhnag X, Chen X, Liao L, Pan R, Zhou N, et al. Value of three dimensional hysterosalpingo contrast sonography with SonoVue in the assessment of tubal patency. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(1):93-8.

Jeanty P, Besnard S, Arnold A, Turner C, Crum P. Air-contrast sonohysterography as a first step assessment of tubal patency. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19:519-27.

Rajesh H, Lim SL, Yu SL. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography: patient selection and perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2016;9:23-32.

Musarrat H, Farhat J, Erum S, Seema M, Nazish S. Experience with gaseous spring water a contrast agent in tubal patency assessment. J Med Ultrasound. 2009;167-172.