Role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of early pregnancy failure

Authors

  • Rosy Khanam Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Cachar, Assam, India
  • Pranoy Nath Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Cachar, Assam, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210324

Keywords:

Early pregnancy failure, Fetal developmental markers, Transabdominal sonography, Transvaginal sonography

Abstract

Background: The most crucial period of intra uterine life are the first twelve weeks of gestation, where history and clinical examination may often be inconclusive. Ultrasonography plays an important role in confirming the pregnancy, its site and viability. The objective of this study was to determine the first trimester ultrasonographic findings of a normal intrauterine pregnancy, early pregnancy failure and to have a comparative evaluation of transvaginal with transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of early pregnancy failure.

Methods: Cross sectional study done in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital from 1st June 2019 to 31st May 2020. Data were collected from 80 patients presenting to the Antenatal and Gynaecology OPD of Silchar Medical College, with positive urine beta HCG test with signs and symptoms suggestive of early pregnancy. The study was conducted during the said study period. General physical and pelvic examination done for in the cases provisional clinical diagnosis and subjected to ultrasound. Sonography by both abdominal and transvaginal method was done and findings were compared.

Results: 70% of cases in this study came out to be of normal pregnancy while 30% of the total cases were of abnormal pregnancy. Various fetal developmental markers such as gestational sac, yolk sac, fetal pole, fetal heart motion, double decidual sac sign were visualised in better number of cases by transvaginal sonography than by abdominal. Amongst cases of abnormal pregnancy, parameters such as detection of abnormality in shape of gestational sac, abnormality in yolk sac were found to be better seen with transvaginal sonography than with transabdominal sonography. Measurements of mean sac diameter, crown rump length were found to be similar by both the methods.

Conclusions: Combination of abdominal sonography and transvaginal sonography complements the defects of two methods and thus improves the accuracy of diagnosis. Thus it can be said that transvaginal sonography should not be used as a substitute but as a conjunct with abdominal sonography for better visualization, improved diagnosis thereby leading to better management of the patients.

Author Biographies

Rosy Khanam, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Cachar, Assam, India

Post Graduate Trainee , Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Pranoy Nath, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Silchar Medical College and Hospital, Cachar, Assam, India

Professor & Head, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

References

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Early pregnancy loss. Practice Bulletin No. 150. Obstet Gynecol 2015;125:1258-67.

Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, Armstrong EG, Nisula BC. Incidence of early loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(4):189-94.

Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O'Connor JF, Baird DD, Schlatterer JP, Canfield RE, et al. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:577-84.

Hill LM, Guzick D, Fries J, Hixson J. Fetal loss rate after ultrasonically documented cardiac activity between 6 and 14 weeks, menstrual age. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991;19(4):221-3.

Wyatt PR, Owolabi T, Meier C, Huang T. Age-specific risk of fetal loss observed in a second trimester serum screening population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):240-6.

athi RB, Milki, A. Tissue sampling technique affects accuracy of karyotype from missed abortions. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002;19:536-8.

Morin L, Cargill YM, Glanc P. Ultrasound evaluation of first trimester complications of pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2016;38(10):982-8.

Kaur A, Kaur A. Transvaginal ultrasonography in first trimester of pregnancy and its comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2011;3(3):329-38.

Doubilet PM, Benson CB, Bourne T, Blaivas M. Diagnostic criteria for non viable pregnancy early in the first trimester. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Multispeciality Panel on Early First trimester diagnosis of miscarriage and exclusion of a viable intrauterine pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1443-51.

Arias F, Bhide AG, Arulkumaran S, Damania K, Daftary SN, editors. Practical Guide to High Risk Pregnancy and Delivery. 4th edn. Elsevier health sciences; 2012;107-108.

Nyberg DA, Laing FC, Filly RA. Threatened abortion: sonographic distinction of normal and abnormal gestation sacs. Radiology. 1986;158:397-400.

Nyberg DA, Hill LM. Normal early intrauterine pregnancy: Sonographic development and HCG correlation. In: Nyberg DA, Hill LM, Bohm-Velez M, Mendelson EB, eds. Transvaginal Ultrasound. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1992:65.

Mustafa MZ. Transvaginal scan versus transabdominal scan for gestational sac detection in the early first trimester of pregnancy in Sudanese ladies. Asian J Med Clin Sci. 2012;1:19-21.

Rani PR, Sunita V. Ultrasound evaluation of vaginal bleeding in first trimester of pregnancy. J Ostet Gynecol Ind. 2000;50:54-8.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles