Analytical survey of scenario for permanent method of contraception
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20210309Keywords:
Parity, Family size, Male child, Permanent contraceptionAbstract
Background: This study has analysed the average completed family size with relation to parity, average age of both partners accepting permanent contraception, the percentage of women who finished their family with only female children and comparison of practice observed in rural and urban population.
Methods: A retrospective analytical study was conducted at RKDF medical college and research centre Bhopal M.P. from 1 January 2017 to 31 August 2020 (3 Years 7 months) on 286 patients. Data of the patients who had undergone tubal ligation after normal vaginal delivery, caesarean section, with medical termination of pregnancy and interval tubectomy was collected at RKDF medical college and research centre Bhopal M.P.
Results: Parity wise maximum number of cases completed their family with two issues i.e. (51%). Permanent sterilisation was done in even one issue in (0.6%) minimum number of cases were observed in 9 issues (0.34%). Rural versus urban distribution was 25 and 75% respectively. Maximum age observed was 47 years of husband and 42 years of wife.
Conclusions: For the desire of male child, number of female children increased thereby increasing the family size.
References
Bairagi R. Effects of sex preference on contraceptive use, abortion and fertility in Matlab, Bangladesh. Int Family Planning Perspect. 2001;27(3):137-43.
Barua A, Kurz K. Reproductive health-seeking by married adolescent girls in Maharashtra, India. Reproduct Health Matters. 2001;9(17):53-62.
Barua A, Pande R, MacQuarrie K, Walia S. Caring men? Husbands’ involvement in maternal care of young wives. Economic Political Weekly. 2004;39(52):5661-8.
Bhat PN, Zavier MA. Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography. 2003;40(4):637-57.
Pande R. Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography. 2003;40(3):395-418.
Retherford RD, Roy TK. National family health survey subject reports, nr. 21. Mumbai, India: International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS). Factors affecting sex-selective abortion in India and 17 major states. 2003;78.
Dharmalingam A. The social context of family size preferences and fertility behaviour in a south Indian village. Genus. 1996;52(1-2):83-103.
Clark S. Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography. 2000;37(1):95-108.
Donaldson P. The elimination of contraceptive acceptor targets and the evolution of population policy in India. Population Studies. 2002;56(1):97-110.
Hussain R, Fikree FF, Berendes HW. The role of son preference in reproductive behaviour in Pakistan. Bull WHO. 2000;78(3):379-88.
Yount KM, Langsten R, Hill K. The effect of gender preference on contraceptive use and fertility in rural Egypt. Studies Family Planning. 2000;31(4):290-300.
Leone T, Matthews Z, Dalla Zuanna G. Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. Int Family Planning Perspect. 2003;29(2):69-75.
Anuja J, Mishra V, Arnold F. The Effect of Family Size and Composition on Fertility Desires, Contraceptive Adoption, and Method Choice in South Asia. DHS Working Papers No. 40. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Macro International. 2008;1-26.