DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205751

The impact of chorionicity on maternal and fetal outcomes

Leonor Bivar, Maria Casteleiro, Rita Vasconcelos, Ana Borges, Cátia Abreu, Isabel Reis, Ricardo Sousa-Santos

Abstract


Background: Women carrying twin pregnancies receive extensive antenatal counselling on fetal risks, but less is known about whether the presence of two placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We pretend to determine the impact of chorionicity on the maternal and fetal outcome, evaluating the possibility of finding the association between complications and the presence of two placental masses.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 550 twin pregnancies monitored at a level-3 hospital, between January 2004 and December 2018.

Results: Of the 550 pregnancies, 419 (76.2%) were bichorionic and 131 (23.8%) were monochorionic. Caesarean delivery was more frequent in monochorionic group (70.2% vs. 61.8%, p=0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of adverse maternal outcomes between bichorionic and monochorionic pregnancies, despite a trend towards higher proportions in bichorionic group. Regarding fetal outcomes, monochorionic twins were delivered earlier (mean gestational age of 34+4 weeks vs. 35+1 weeks, p=0.04) and the proportion of preterm delivery cases between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks was higher in monochorionic pregnancies (72.5% vs. 54.9%, p=0.002). Stillbirth of one or both twins was more frequent in monochorionic group (3.1% vs. 0.5%, p=0.03).

Conclusions: The presence of two placental masses does not seems to confer an increase in maternal risks, despite a trend towards higher proportions of adverse outcomes in bichorionic pregnancies. However, monochorionicity is associated with an increase in fetal risks, particularly prematurity. Counselling and monitoring of bichorionic or monochorionic pregnancies may be identical with respect to maternal risks, but chorionicity should be considered when evaluating fetal risks.


Keywords


Chorionicity, Fetal outcome, Maternal outcome, Twin pregnancy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rodrigues CT, Branco MR, Ferreira ID, Nordeste A, Fonseca M, Taborda A, et al. Multiple gestation epidemiology - 15 years survey. Acta Med Port. 2005;18:107-11.

Manso P, Vaz A, Taborda A, Silva IS. Chorionicity and perinatal complications in twin pregnancy: a 10 years case series. Acta Med Port. 2011;24:695-8.

Kupka MS, D'Hooghe T, Ferraretti AP, de MJ, Erb K, Castilla JA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European Registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):233e48.

Endres L, Wilkins I. Epidemiology and biology of multiple gestations. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32:301-14.

Rodrigues CT, Branco MR, Ferreira ID, Nordeste A, Fonseca M, Taborda A, et al. Multiple gestation epidemiology - 15 years survey. Acta Med Port. 2005;18:107-11.

Dubé J, Dodds L, Armson BA. Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:579.

Parazzini F, Cipriani S, Bianchi S, Bulfoni C, Bortolus R, Somigliana E. Risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproduction: a population-based approach. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016;19:72-6.

Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, Abuhamad AZ, Berghella V. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:305.

Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, Sepulveda W, Nicolaides KH. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1203.

Adegbite AL, Castille S, Ward S, Bajoria R. Neuromorbidity in preterm twins in relation to chorionicity and discordant birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:156.

Leduc L, Takser L, Rinfret D. Persistence of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1670.

Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, Franx A, Roos EJ, Voerman SK, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG. 2008;115:58.

Sperling L, Tabor A. Twin pregnancy: the role of ultrasound in management. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:287-99.

Fabio Parazzini, Sonia Cipriani, Stefano Bianchi, Camilla Bulfoni, Renata Bortolus, Edgardo Somigliana. Risk of Monozygotic Twins After Assisted Reproduction: A Population-Based Approach. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 2006;19:72-76.

Sibai BM, Hauth J, Caritis S, Lindheimer MD, MacPherson C, Klebanoff M, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182:938-942.

Buhling KJ, Henrich W, Starr E, Lubke M, Bertram S, Siebert G, et al. Risk for gestational diabetes and hypertension for women with twin pregnancy compared to singleton pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;269:33-36.

Rauh-Hain JA, Rana S, Tamez H, Wang A, Cohen B, Cohen A, et al. Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22:293-299.

A. Victoria, G. Mora, F. Arias. Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:310-15.

Feng B, Zhai J, Cai Y. Effect of twin pregnancy chorionic properties on maternal and fetal outcomes. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;57(3):351-4.

Cunningham FG, MacDonald PC, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LC III, Hankins GDV, et al. Williams obstetrics. 20th ed. Stanford, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange. 1997:880.

Qin J, Wang H, Sheng X, Liang D, Tan H, Xia J. Pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in multiple pregnancies resulting from assisted reproductive technology: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:1492-508.