Prevention of vault prolapse in cases of procedentia using combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach for vault suspension: Agrawal’s technique

Authors

  • Priti Agrawal Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-8592
  • Rishi Agrawal Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India
  • Jyotirmay Chandrakar Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205785

Keywords:

Procedentia, Vault prolapse, Sacrocolpopexy

Abstract

Background: The objective of the current study was to assess the need of vault suspension after completion of hysterectomy in all cases of procedentia to prevent vault prolapse and to reduce the operating time for sacrocolpopexy using combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach by two surgeons.

Methods: A total of 25 women undergoing surgery for procedentia were included. After completion of hysterectomy the need for vault suspension was assessed intraoperatively. In all cases polypropelene mesh was fixed vaginally to the uterosacral and cardinal ligaments. Vaginal vault was closed vaginally. Laparoscopic surgeon did laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). Intraoperative and post-operative complications were then evaluated.

Results: Our average operating time was 35 minutes for vaginal hysterectomy and 15 minutes for LSC. The shorter duration of surgery was because mesh was fixed vaginally and trackers were used to fix the mesh to sacral promontory. Intraoperative complications like bladder, ureteric, bowel injuries and hemorrhage were nil in our series. Postoperative stay in hospital was uneventful and all cases were discharged on second postoperative day. Conversion rate to laparotomy was nil. All cases have completed follow up for 5 years with 100% subjective and objective improvement.

Conclusions: Restoration of vagina to its normal anatomic position remains the most important fact to prevent vault prolapse. Our technique is very easy, less time taking with negligible complication rates.

Author Biographies

Priti Agrawal, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

 Director and Head of the department.

Department  of Obstetrics, Gynecology and infertility.

Rishi Agrawal, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Director and Head of the department.

Department  of general and laparoscopic surgery

Jyotirmay Chandrakar, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, Aarogya Hospital and Test Tube Baby Center, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Consultant Anesthetist

Department of anesthesia

References

Price N, Slack A, Jackson S.R, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: An observational study of functional and anatomic outcomes. Int urogynecol J. 2011;22(1):77-82.

DeLanncey JOL, Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717-24.

Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, Gutue S, Geavlete P, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) - a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J Med Life. 2011;4(1):75-81.

RCOG/BSUG. Post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, Green-top Guidelines. 2015l46:1-21.

RCOG/BSUG. The management of post hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse, Green-top Guidelines. 2007;46:1-13.

Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, Connolly AM, Cundiff G, Weber AM, et al, Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Comprehensive review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):805-22.

Nosti PA, Andy UU, Kane S, White DE, Harvi HS, Lowenstein L, et al, Outcomes of abdominal and minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: A retrospective cohort study, Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery. 2014;20(1):33-7.

Agrawal P, Agrawal R, Chandrakar J. Role of laparoscopy in vaginal hysterectomy for non prolapsed uterus. J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;57(2):151-4.

Baessler, Kaven MD, Schuessler, Bernhard MD. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy and anatomy and function of the posterior compartment. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(5):678-84.

Detollenaere RJ, Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Inthou t J, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectom y with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:3717.

Carey M, Slack M, Higgs P, Williams MW, Cornish A. Vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using mesh and a vaginal support device. BJOG. 2008;115(3):391-7.

Bergersen A, Hinkel C, Funk J, Twiss CO. Management of vaginal mesh exposure: A systematic review. Arab Jurol. 2019;17(1):40-8.

Shah HN, Badlani GH. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review. Indian J Urol. 2012;28(20):129-53.

Lee RK, Mottrie A, Payne CK, Waltregny D. A review of the Current Status of laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Euro Urol. 2014;65:1128-37.

Bojahr B, Tchartchian G, Waldschmidt M, Schollmeyer T, Wilde RLD. Laparoscopic sacropexy: a retrospective analysis of perioperative complications and anatomical outcomes. JSLS. 2012;16(3):428-36.

Wong V, Rojas RG, Shek KL, Chou D, Moore KH, Dietz HP, Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: how low does the mesh go? ISUOG. 2017;49(3):404-8.

Bijalwan RP, Bhagavatula M, Semwal VD, Rawat P, Anand V. Morbidity of Uterine Prolapsed among the Women in the Chakrata Block of Dehradun District. Ind J Community Heal. 2015;27(1):103-9.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles