Cervical sonomorphometric evaluation of normal and preterm labour by transvaginal and transabdominal sonography

Authors

  • Khusboo . Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Dinesh Kumar Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Ashish Verma Department of Radiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • Suman Chaurasia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, ESIC and PGIMSR Medical College, Chennai, India
  • Ramvilas Nag Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Medical Sciences, BHU, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170042

Keywords:

Cervical length, Preterm delivery, Transvaginal ultrasonography, Transabdominal sonographic

Abstract

Background: Preterm delivery is major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Measuring cervical length (CL) with ultrasonography has become increasingly acceptable as an early diagnostic procedure in patients at risk for PTL, with transvaginal ultrasonography (TV Us) being considered as the gold standard for the CL assessment.

Methods: A cohort of women with singleton pregnancies, and confirmed gestational age by first or early second trimester ultrasonography, last menstrual period & clinical assessment were selected to undergo transvaginal and transabdominal sonographic measurement of cervical length between 16 and 34 week gestation. Cervical length was first measured by transabdominal route (TAS) using a 3.5 MHz curved electronic array transducer with the patient in the supine position and with a full bladder, transvaginal sonography (TVS) was done by a 7.5 MHz probe attached to an ultrasound machine. The probe was covered with a latex condom and gel placed between the transducer and the cover and also on the surface. It was then gently inserted in the vagina to obtain a sagittal view of the cervix. Doppler measurement were taken by both transabdominal and transvaginal route.

Results: Gradual decrease in cervical length is seen with advancement of gestation weeks. TA Us cervical length values are noted higher than TV Us however significance is seen only at 24 weeks and cervical width are showing gradual increase with advancement of gestation weeks without significant difference between them. The study compared the mean spectral Doppler parameters RI, PI and S/D Ratio at different weeks & observed that TV Us values are more at each gestation weeks than TA Us showing significant difference 24 weeks onwards.

Conclusions: Although discrepancy in statistical significance, short cervical length, funneling and gland area are important to recognize for prediction of premature onset of labour, owing to the potential for perinatal morbidity and mortality and socioeconomic burden. Transvaginal sonography remains the dominant imaging modality for evaluation of the cervix. It is operator dependent modality so care should be taken to evaluate each morphologic character.

References

Yazici G, Yildiz A, Tiras MB, Arslan M, Kanik A, Oz U. Comparison of transperineal and transvaginal sonography in predicting pre- term delivery. J Clin Ultrasound. 2004;32(5):225-30.

da Fonseca EB, Damiao R, Nicholaides K. Prevention of preterm birth based on short cervix: progesterone. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(5):334-7.

Kurtzman JT, Goldsmith LJ, Gall SA, Spinnato JA. Transvaginal versus transperineal ultrasonography: a blinded comparison in the assessment of cervical length at midgestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(4):852-7.

Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Souteenbeek P, Visser GH. Transperineal versus transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement in second- and third-trimester pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):657-62.

Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:567-72.

Mukherji J, Anant M, Ghosh S, Bhattacharyya SK, Hazra A, Kamilya GS. Normative data of cervical length in singleton pregnancy in women attending a tertiary care hospital in eastern India. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133(5):492-6.

Bertozzi S, Londero AP, Fruscalzo A, Driul L, Marchesoni D. Ultrasonographic assessment of cervix size and its correlation with female characteristics, pregnancy, BMI, and other anthropometric features. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;283(3):545-50.

Meijer-Hoogeveen Hoogeveen M, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH. Dynamic cervical length changes: preliminary observations from 30-minute transvaginal ultrasound recordings. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;20(6):481-6.

Berghella V, Roman A, Daskalakis C, Ness A, Baxter JK. Gestational age at cervical length measurement and incidence of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:311-7.

Jo YS, Jang DG, Kim N. Comparison of Cervical Parameters by Three-Dimensional Ultrasound according to Parity and Previous Delivery Mode. Int J Med Sci. 2011;8(8):673-8.

Berghella V, Kuhlman K, Weiner S, Texeira L, Wapner RJ. Cervical funneling: sonographic criteria predictive of preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10:161-6.

Owen J, Berghella V, MacPherson C, Yost N. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) Natural history of cervical funneling in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):863-9.

Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, Bennasar M, Martínez JM, Puerto B, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11-41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128-32.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles