DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204465

Two-year surgical review of elective hysterectomy for non-oncological indications: experience from a tertiary centre

John J. K. Annan, Thomas O. Konney, Gerald O. Asubonteng, Wilfred S. Awortwi

Abstract


Background: This retrospective descriptive cross-sectional study was aimed at determining indications, surgical outcomes, complications and challenges of elective non-oncological hysterectomies performed at a tertiary referral centre over a 2-year period (1st December 2018 to 31st December 2019).

Methods: With ethical approval, the medical records of all eligible women were retrieved, reviewed and analyzed. Measures of central tendencies, frequencies and percentages were used to compute the variables.

Results: During the 2-year study period, a total of 245 elective non-oncological hysterectomies were performed. The age of the women ranged from 33 to 80 years with a mean age of 49.08 years; [standard deviation (SD): 8.88]. Women in the 40-49 year-old-age group constituted the majority 55.51% (n=136/245). Main indications were multinodular fibroid uterus (without menorrhagia), fibroid uterus with menorrhagia and genital prolapse. There was no case of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Majority (98.78%; n=242/245) of the hysterectomies were total hysterectomies. The commonest additional procedures performed was bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (31.84%; n=78/245). Intra-operative complication rates were low: (0.40%; n=1/245) for bowel injury, bladder injury and bleeding from an ovary. Regional anaesthesia was the commonest type of anaesthesia (71.84%; n=176/245). The primary surgeon was above the level of a specialist in 99.19% (n=243/245) of cases.

Conclusions: Most women had hysterectomy for non-oncological indications in their fourth and fifth decades of life on account of fibroid-related conditions and genital prolapse. There was no uptake of laparoscopic hysterectomy. Hysterectomies are generally safe in the hands of an experienced and skilled surgical team.


Keywords


Non-oncological hysterectomy, Fibroid, Adenomyosis, Menorrhagia, Chronic pelvic pain

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lowensteina L, Yarnitskyb D, Gruenwaldc I, Deutscha M, Sprecherb E, Gedaliac U. et al. Does hysterectomy affect genital sensation? Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;119,242-5.

Tommaso F, Mark W. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:753-67.

Saini J, Kuczynski E, Gretz H. F, Sills ES. Supracervical hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: perceived effects on sexual function. Bio Med Cent Wom Heal. 2002;1186-91.

Reich H, DeCaprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1989;5:213-6.

Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Perone C, Rasile M, Iuzzolino D. et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for early stage endometrial cancer: A prospective randomized study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112:126-33.

Advincula AP, Song A. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19: 331-6.

Gaia G, Holloway RW, Santoro L, Ahmad S, Di Silverio E, Spinillo A. Robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer compared with traditional laparoscopic and laparotomy approaches: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1422-31.

Ayala-Yáñez R, Olaya-Guzmán EJ, Haghenbeck- Altamirano J. Robotics in gynecology: Why is this technology worth pursuing? Clin Med Insights Reprod Heal. 2013;7:71-7.

Wu ES, Jeronimo J, Feldman S. Barriers and challenges to treatment alternatives for early-stage cervical cancer in lower-resource settings. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3:572-82.

Schwarts M, Jeng C-J, Chuang LT. Laparoscopic surgery for gynecologic cancer in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs): An area of need. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;20:100-2.

Johnston C, Ng JS, Manchanda R, Tsunoda AT, Chuang L. Variations in gynecologic oncology training in low (LIC) and middle income (MIC) countries (LMICs): Common efforts and challenges. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2017;20:9-14.

Lenihan JP, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:589-94.

Gupta G, Kotasthane DS, Kotasthane VD. Hysterectomy: a clinico-pathological correlation of 500 cases. Intern J Gynecol Obstetet. 2009;14(1):1-5

Sharma C, Sharma M, Raina R, Soni A, Chander B, Verma S. Gynecological diseases in rural India: A critical appraisal of indications and route of surgery along with histopathology correlation of 922 women undergoing major gynecological surgery. J Mi Lif Heal. 2014;5(2):55-61.

Kouam L, Kongnyuy EJ, Ngassa P, Fomulu N, Wamba MT, Doh AS. Hysterectomy: A 12-year retrospective review in the Yaoundé University Teaching Hospital. Clinic Moth Chil Heal. 2005;2:347-50.

Okunade KS, Sekumade A, Daramola E, Oluwole AA. A 4-Year clinical review of elective hysterectomies at a university teaching hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. J Gynecol Surg 2017;33:193-7.

Ogunlaja OA, Fehintola AO, Akinola SE, Awotunde OT, Durodola AO, Ogunlaja IP et al. A clinical audit of hysterectomy in Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, South West Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;33:64-9.

Forsgren C, Altman D. Long-term effects of hysterectomy: a focus on the aging patient. Agi Heal. 2013;9(2):179-87.

Khan AT, Shehmar M, Gupta JK. Uterine fibroids: Current perspectives. Int J Wome Heal. 2014;6:95-114.

Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Uterine fibroid management: From the present to the future. Hum Reprod Upda. 2016;22:665-86.

Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet 2001;357(9252):293-8

Nausheen F, Iqbal J, Bhatti FA, Khan AT, Sheikh S. Hysterectomy: The patients perspective. Anna Kin Edwa Medic Univ. 2004;10(4).

Tiwana KK, Nibhoria S, Monga T, Phutela R. Histopathological Audit of 373 Nononcological Hysterectomies in a Teaching Hospital. Patholog Res Int. 2014;2014:468715.

Abe E, Omo-Aghoja LO. A decade of hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital in urban Niger-Delta region of Nigeria. Nigerian J Clin Practice. 2008;11(4):359-63.

Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(3):187-93.

Khan AT, Shehmar M, Gupta JK. Uterine fibroids: Current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 2014;6: 95-114.

Sucheta KL, Manangi M, Madhu KP, Arun BJ, Nagaraj N. Hysterectomy: clinical profile, indications and postoperative complications. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:2093-6.

Shaikh TA, Memon F, Memon Z. Hysterectomies; an audit at a tertiary care hospital. Profession Med J. 2011;18(1).

Juneja SK, Tandon P, Mohan B, Kaushal S. A change in the management of intractable obstetrical hemorrhage over 15 years in a tertiary care center. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014;4(1):S17-9.

Aksu F, Gezer A, Oral E. Seventeen-year review of hysterectomy procedures in a university clinic in Istanbul 1985-2001. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004;270(4):217-22.

Pandey D, Sehgal K, Saxena A, Hebbar S, Nambiar J, Bhat RG. An audit of indications, complications, and justification of hysterectomies at a teaching hospital in India. Int J Reprod Med. 2014;(2014):1-6

Toma A, Hopman WM, Gorwill RH. Hysterectomy at a Canadian tertiary care facility: results of a one year retrospective review. Brit Med Centr Wome Heal. 2004;4(1):10.

Bernatchez-Laflamme SM, Bujold E, Roberge S, Laberge PY. Development of technicality indices of hysterectomies in Quebec. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35:144-8.

Evans D, Burnett M. Audit of minimally invasive hysterectomy rates: A Canadian retrospective cross-sectional database review. Hospit Practic Resear. 2018;3:1-5.

Greer I, Lang G, Patel N. The Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Aberdeen: Scottish Obstetric Guidelines and Audit Project. 1998.

Rishi R, Fay L, Mckenna P. A 27-Year Review of Obstetric Hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23:(3):252–4.

Egbe TO, Kobenge FM, Arlette MMJ, Eta-Nkongho E, Nyemb JE, Enow MR. Prevalence and Outcome of Hysterectomy at the Douala General Hospital, Cameroon: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Surg Res Pract. 2018;5:092.

Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(2):199–205.