DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20204794

Rising trends of caesarean section in modern obstetrics: analysis by Robson classification

Shery Angel Rajakumar, Sindhura Myneni, Kamala Roshini M.

Abstract


Background: Rising caesarean section (CS) rates are a major public health concern worldwide. The main objective of our study was to analyse the CS rates according to Robson ten group classification system (TGCS).

Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynaecology at Chettinad hospital and research institute, during a period of 5 years from May 2015 to April 2020. All the women who delivered by CS were included in the study. The data regarding parity, gestational age, onset of labour, number of foetuses and presentation was collected and classified according to Robson TGCS and analysed.

Results: A total of 4199 women delivered during the study period. Out of 4199 women 2149 (51.18%) underwent CS. All the women who underwent caesarean section were classified according to Robson TGCS. Group 5 contributed the most (40.81%). Group 2 had the second highest contribution of 33.36%. Group 1 had 6.24%, group 3 and 4 contributed for 1.16% and 4.65% respectively. Group 6 and 7 had 2.84% and 1.68% respectively. Group 8 had 2.28%, group 9 had 0.23% and group 10 constituted 6.75%.

Conclusion: As contribution of repeat CS is high among the overall CS rate it is important to reduce the primary CS rates. More analytical studies need to be done based on Robson TGCS to evaluate the indication of CS within each group.


Keywords


CS, Robson classification, Labour, Vaginal birth after CS

Full Text:

PDF

References


World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;326(8452):436-7.

Jacob KJ, Jayaprakash M, Hibina KP. TMC (Thrissur Medical College) modified Robson criteria for caesarean sections. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(11):5038-43.

Romero Von Roosenmalen J, Van der Does CD. Caesarean birth rate worldwide. A search for determinants. Trop Geogr Med. 1995;47(1):19-22.

Robson Classification Implementation Manual, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA-3.0 IGO. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/259512/1/9789241513197-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed on 24th July 2020.

National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2006;23(1):1-29.

Sah S, Goel R, Goel JK. Analysis of caesarean section rate according to Robson’s criteria in tertiary care centre. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(8):3061.

Patel RV, Gosalia EV, Deliwala KJ, Vasa PB, Pandya VM. Indications and trends of caesarean birth delivery in the current practice scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3(3):575-80.

Kazmi T, Saiseema SV, Khan S. Analysis of caesarean section rate according to Robson’s 10 group classification. Oman Med J. 2012;27(5):415-7.

Litorp H, Kidanto HL, Nystrom L, Darj E, Essen B. Increasing caesarean section rates among low-risk groups: a panel study classifying deliveries according to Robson at a university hospital in Tanzania. Bio Med Centre Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:107.

Tanaka K, Mahomed K. The ten-group Robson classification: a single centre approach identifying strategies to optimise caesarean section rates. Obstet Gynaecol Int. 2017;2017:1-6.

Ray A, Jose S. Analysis of caesarean-section rates according to Robson's ten group classification system and evaluating the indications within the groups. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(2):447-51.

Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, Hvidman L, Uldbjerg N. Trial of labour compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2013;92(11):1256-63.

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010;191(191):1-397.

Tura AK, Pijpers O, de Man M, Cleveringa M, Koopmans I, Gure T et al. Analysis of caesarean sections using Robson 10-group classification system in a university hospital in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ open. 2018;8(4):e020520.

Kansara V, Patel S, Aanand N, Muchhadia J, Kagathra B, Patel R. A recent way of evaluation of cesarean birth rate by Robson’s 10-group system. J Med Pharmaceut Allied Sci. 2014;01:62-70.

Dhodapkar SB, Bhairavi S, Daniel M, Chauhan NS, Chauhan RC. Analysis of caesarean sections according to Robson’s ten group classification system at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4(3):745-9.

Farine D, Shepherd D, Robson M, Gagnon R, Hudon L, Basso M et al. Classification of caesarean sections in Canada: the modified Robson criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2012;34(10):976-9.

Prameela RC, Farha D, Bhanumati P. Prajwa S. Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate in a Tertiary Hospital-according to Robson’s 10 Group Classification System. J Dental Med Sci. 2015;14(2):46-9.