DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20203333

A comparative study of two layer versus three-layer repair of mediolateral episiotomy

Manasi V. Gaikwad, M. Vijaya Sree, Swapnil V. Bobde

Abstract


Background: Since majority of the women attending study hospital are belonging to lower socioeconomic strata and active involvement of paramedical staff in providing obstetric care, this study was undertaken to find the utility of a two-layer repair of mediolateral episiotomy and compare it with the standard method of closure in relation to its simplicity, cost-effectiveness and superiority if any, over the traditional three-layered repair of episiotomy.

Methods: This was a prospective interventional study comparing 100 women who underwent two-layer closure with 100 women who underwent three-layer closure of episiotomy in a tertiary care hospital in Pune, India over a period of 2 years from October 2012 to October 2014. The parameters assessed were operative time, number of suture materials required, immediate post procedure pain and complications at follow-up. Qualitative and quantitative data was analysed using unpaired t-test, chi square test and Fisher exact test.

Results: Both the groups were comparable in terms of hospital stay and wound complications such as oedema, dehiscence, hematoma, requirement of resuturing, cosmesis and long-term complications such as dyspareunia. However, two-layer repair required less operative time, lesser number of suture materials and decreased pain during hospital stay as there was statistically significant difference observed between the two groups.

Conclusions: In this study experience, it can be concluded that two-layer repair of episiotomy is faster, with less post-operative pain and more cost effective. Hence it provides mother with better services.


Keywords


Continuous, Episiotomy, Interrupted, Mediolateral, Three-layer, Two-layer

Full Text:

PDF

References


Gemynthe A, Langhoff-Roos J, Sahl S, Knudsen J. New VICRYL formulation: an improved method of perineal repair?. Br J Midwife. 1996;4(5):230-4.

Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;3:CD000081.

Kudish B, Blackwell S, Mcneeley SG, Bujold E, Kruger M, Hendrix SL, Sokol R. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):749-54.

Morano S, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Lijoi D, Costantini S, Ragni N. A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. J Minimal Inv Gynecol. 2006;13(5):457-62.

Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KM. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;4:CD000947.

Klein M. Episiotomy and the second stage of labour. Canad Family Phys. 1988;34:2019.

Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient: a susceptible host for infection. Surgical infections. 2006;7(5):473-80.

Bishop A. Role of oxygen in wound healing. J Wound Care. 2008;17(9):399-402.

Hasanpoor S, Bani S, Shahgole R, Gojazadeh M. The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial. J Caring Sci. 2012;1(3):165.

López-Lapeyrere C, Solís-Muñoz M, Hernández-López AB, Rodríguez-Barrientos R, González-Rubio R. Carol research group. Perineal repair of media-lateral episiotomies and 2nd degree tears by midwives: a randomised controlled trial comparing three suture techniques. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;3:103553.

Zafar S. Comparison of a single-knot versus three layered technique of perineal repair after vaginal delivery in women requiring episiotomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial. J Turkish-German Gynecol Associat. 2008;9(3):129-30.

Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente MS, Valero JL, Azorin R, Ortega R, Guijarro R. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second‐degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;116(3):436-41.

Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second‐degree tears. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD000947.

Martínez-Galiano JM, Arredondo-López B, Molina-Garcia L, Cámara-Jurado AM, Cocera-Ruiz E, Rodríguez-Delgado M. Continuous versus discontinuous suture in perineal injuries produced during delivery in primiparous women: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):499.

Sinna R, Qassemyar Q, Benhaim T, Lauzanne P, Sabbagh C, Regimbeau JM, et al. Perforator flaps: a new option in perineal reconstruction. J Plast Reconst Aesth Surg. 2010;63(11):e766-74.

Ramin SM, GILSTRAP III LC. Episiotomy and early repair of dehiscence. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37(4):816-23.