DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20202521

A clinical study of modified McIndoe vaginoplasty with split thickness skin graft: a tertiary care experience

Atul K. Gowardhan, Priya M. Bagade

Abstract


Background: Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) is associated with failure of fetal mullerian-duct development that results in congenital deficiency of the upper part of the vagina with a rudimentary-to-absent uterus. These patients have primary amenorrhoea, infertility as well as insufficient sexual gratification. Although conception can be dealt with IVF and surrogacy but at least by doing neovaginal construction by McIndoe vaginoplasty, these patients have acceptable sexual life and intercourse. The main objective of this study was creating a neovagina leading to a satisfactory sexual life.

Methods: Modified McIndoe vaginoplasty with split thickness skin graft, was done in seven patients with MRKH syndrome from 2014-2017 and these patients were followed till 2019. All patients had detailed counselling regarding the surgery, the complications involved and the outcome. Thorough investigations were done in all the patients.

Results: The functional results were satisfactory in all the seven patients. There was no blood transfusion requirement or any serious complication involved. An average vaginal length of 7-9 cm and vaginal width of 3-4 cm was achieved. Donor site healing was adequate in all patients with no complications.

Conclusions: Modified McIndoe vaginoplasty, if performed with good surgical skills, is a secure and beneficial way to achieve sexual contentment in patient with vaginal agenesis, with no donor site complications.


Keywords


Mullerian agenesis, Neovaginal construction, Sexual satisfaction, Split thickness skin graft

Full Text:

PDF

References


Goldwyn RM. History of attempts to form a vagina. Plast Reconstruct Surg. 1977;59:319.

Mayer CAJ. Uterus malformation and its types with remarks on parenchymal types and septums. J Chirurgie Augen-Heilkunde Berlin. 1829;13:525.

von Rokitansky KF. The malformations of the uterus. Medizinische Jahrbucher Kaiserl Konigl Osterreichischen Staates, Wien. 1838;26:39.

Kuster H. Uterine didelphus with rudimentary vagina. Zeitschrift Geburtshilfe Gyna Kologie, Stuttgart. 1910;67:692.

Hauser GA, Keller M, Koller T. The Rokitansky– Kuster syndrome: Uterine bicornus with rudimentary vagina. Gynaecol Basel. 1961;151:111.

Hauser GA, Schreiner WE. The Mayer–Rokitansky–Kuster syndrome. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift, Basel. 1961;91:383.

Capraro VJ, Gallego MB. Vaginal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;124:98-107.

Tolhurst DE, Helm TWJS van der. The treatment of vaginal atresia. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1991;172:407-14.

Counseller VS, Flor FS. Congenital absence of the vagina: further results of treatment and a new technique. Surg Clin North Am. 1957;37:1107-18.

Hojsgaard A, Villadsen I. McIndoe procedure for congenital vaginal agenesis: complications and results. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48:97-102.

Laub DR, Laub DR. Mullerian and ectodermal vaginal agenesis. In: Smith JW, Aston SJ; eds. Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little, Brown and Co; 1991:1375-1392.

Bean EJ, Mazur T, Robinson AD. Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: sexuality, psychological effects, and quality of life. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2009;22:339.

Evans TN, Poland ML, Boving RL. Vaginal malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:910-20.

Mobus VJ, Kortenhorn K, Kreienberg R, Volker F. Long-term results after operative correction of vaginal aplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:617-24.

Williams JK, Lake M, Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs. 1985;14:147-50.

Hensle TW, Gjertson CK, Reiley EA. Vaginal reconstruction: a review. AUA Update Series. 2005;24:29.

Vesanovic S, Panajotovic L, Garalejic E. Sensibility of vagina reconstructed by McIndoe’s method in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome. Vojnosanitetski Pregled. 2008;65(6):449-55.

McIndoe AH, Banister JB. An operation for the cure of congenital absence of the vagina. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1938;45:490.

McIndoe A. The treatment of congenital absence and obliterative conditions of the vagina. Br J Plast Surg. 1950;2:254-67.

Motta GL, Tavares PM, Burttet LM, Berger M, Silva Neto B, Rosito TE. Vaginoplasty with full-thickness mesh skin graft for vaginal agenesis. Urol. 2016;98:200-3.

Klingele CJ, Gebhart JB, Croak AJ, DiMarco CS, Lesnick TG, Lee RA. McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: long-term outcome and effect on quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1569-73.

Buss JG, Lee RA. McIndoe procedure for vaginal agenesis: results and complications. Mayo Clinic Proceed.1989;64:758-61.

Garcia J, Jones HW. The split thickness graft technic for vaginal agenesis. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;49:328-32.

Chen YB, Cheng TJ, Lin HH, Yang YS. Spatial W. Plasty full-thickness skin graft for neovaginal reconstruction. Plast Recons Surg. 1994;94:727-31.

Akn S. Experience with neovaginal construction using the full-thickness skin graft in vaginal agenesis. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:391-6.

Borkowski A, Czaplicki M, Dobronski P. Twenty years of experience with Krzeski’s cystovaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis in Mayer-Rokitansky-KüsterHauser syndrome: Anatomical, histological, cytological and functional results. BJU Inter. 2008;101:1433-40.

Rock JA, Reeves LA, Retto H, Baramki TA, Zacur HA, Jones HW. Success following vaginal creation for mullerian agenesis. Fertil Steril. 1983;39:809-13.