A study on diagnosis and management of arteriovenous malformation of uterus

Authors

  • Nidhi B. Patel Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVP Hospital and NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Sapana R. Shah Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVP Hospital and NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Purvi M. Parikh Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVP Hospital and NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Tanmay J. Chudasama Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SVP Hospital and NHL Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20202725

Keywords:

Arteriovenous malformation, Curettage, Uterine artery embolization, Uterus

Abstract

Background: Arteriovenous malformation is abnormal connection between an organ’s arterial and venous circulation. In acquired AVM, history of uterine procedure seems inevitable. Their clinical feature is usually vaginal bleeding. It is diagnosed by 2-D ultrasonography combined with colour doppler. Most of the time they resolve spontaneously; however, if left untreated, uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy comes in hand. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of TVUS and colour doppler in the diagnosis and follow-up of treated cases of uterine AVM. This study also aims to evaluate different modalities to manage uterine AVM.

Methods: This was a retrospective study done at tertiary care centre from January 2018 to December 2019 to assess the presentation, treatment, and clinical pictures of patients with uterine AVM that were diagnosed with TVUS. Authors reviewed both (1) clinical data (2) ultrasound data of patients. The diagnostic criteria were “subjective” with a rich vascular network in the myometrium with the use of colour Doppler images and “objective” with a high PSV of 20 cm/sec in the vascular web.

Results: Thirteen patients met the diagnostic criteria mentioned above. Out of that 100% presented with on and off bleeding per vaginum. Recent and remote history of uterine procedures were in found in 84.6% (n=11) of cases. UAE was done in 53.8% (n=7) cases. Thirty-three (33%) (n=5) cases spontaneously resolved when closely monitored with serial imaging and serum beta- HCG levels. Hysterectomy was needed in 7.4% (n=1) of patients of AVM.

Conclusions: Uterine AVM occurred after unsuccessful pregnancies or uterine procedures. Triage of patients for expectant treatment, hormonal treatment vs intervention with uterine artery embolization based on their clinical status, which was supplemented by objective measurements of blood velocity measurement in the AVM, appears to be a good predictor of outcome.

References

Dubreuil G, Loubat E. Aneurysme cirsoide del’uterus. Ann Anat Pathol. 1926;3:697-718.

Hoffman MK, Meilstrup JW, Shackelford DP, Kaminski PF. Arteriovenous malformations of the uterus: an uncommon cause of vaginal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1997;52:736-40.

Lui MW, Shek NW, Li RH, Chu F, Pun TC. Management of heterotopic caesarean scar pregnancy by repeated transvaginal ultra-sonographic-guided aspiration with successful preservation of normal intrauterine pregnancy and complicated by arteriovenous malformation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;175:209-10.

Diwan RV, Brennan JN, Selim MA, McGrew TL, Rashad FA, Rustia MU, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of arteriovenous malformation of the uterus and pelvis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1983;11:295-8.

Vogelzang RL, Nemcek AA, Skrtic Z, Gorrell J, Lurain JR. Uterine arteriovenous malformations: primary treatment with therapeutic embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1991;2:517-22.

Halperin R, Schneider D, Maymon R, Peer A, Pansky M, Herman A. Arteriovenous malformation after uterine curettage: a report of 3 cases. J Reprod Med. 2007;52:445-9.

Peitsidis P, Manolakos E, Tsekoura V, Kreienberg R, Schwentner L. Uterine arteriovenous malformations induced after diagnostic curettage: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:1137-51.

Takeda A, Koike W, Imoto S, Nakamura H. Conservative management of uterine artery pseudoaneurysm after laparoscopic-assisted myomectomy and subsequent pregnancy outcome: case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;182:146-53.

McIvor J, Cameron EW. Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization to control haemorrhage from gestational trophoblastic tumour. Br J Radiol. 1996;69:624-9.

Newlands ES, Bagshawe KD, Begent RH, Rustin GJ, Holden L, Dent J. Developments in chemotherapy for medium- and high-risk patients with gestational trophoblastic tumours. BJOG. 1979-1984;1986(93):63-9.

Manolitsas T, Hurley V, Gilford E. Uterine arteriovenous malformation: a rare cause of uterine haemorrhage. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;34:197-9.

Timmerman D, Wauters J, Van Calenbergh S, Van Schoubroeck D, Maleux G, Van Den Bosch T, et al. Color Doppler imaging is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of uterine vascular malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21:570-7.

Yoon DJ, Jones M, Al Taani J, Buhimschi C, Dowell JD. A systematic review of acquired uterine arteriovenous malformations: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and transcatheter treatment. Am J Perinatol Reports. 2016;6(01):e6-14.

Timor-Tritsch IE, Haynes MC, Monteagudo A, Khatib N, Kovács S. Ultrasound diagnosis and management of acquired uterine enhanced myometrial vascularity/arteriovenous malformations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):731-e1.

Ghai S, Rajan DK, Asch MR, Muradali D, Simons ME, TerBrugge KG. Efficacy of embolization in traumatic uterine vascular malformations. J Vascular Intervent Radiol. 2003;14(11):1401-8.

Wang Z, Chen J, Shi H, Zhou K, Sun H, Li X, et al. Efficacy and safety of embolization in iatrogenic traumatic uterine vascular malformations. Clinical Radiol. 2012;67(6):541-5.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles