A cross sectional observational study to evaluate the maternal and fetal outcome in postdated pregnancies

Authors

  • Ritika Narayan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India
  • Sheela S. R. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20205762

Keywords:

Cesarean section, Fetal outcome, Maternal morbidity, NICU admissions, Postdated pregnancy

Abstract

Background: Post-dated pregnancy is when the gestation is more than 40 weeks or 280 days. They last longer than the estimated date of delivery. Postdated pregnancies are associated with increased perinatal and maternal complications. These risks are greater than it was originally thought. Risks have been underestimated in the past leading to increasing number of complicated postdated pregnancies which appears to be otherwise low risk. The maternal risks are very often underappreciated resulting in increased maternal morbidity.

Methods: This cross sectional observational study was done to evaluate maternal and fetal complications associated with Postdated pregnancies was carried out in the department of obstetrics and gynecology in a tertiary care centre, Sir Devraj Urs Medical College and RL Jalappa Hospital, Kolar between July 2018 and July 2019, fulfilling all the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results: 50 out of 100 patients had full term normal deliveries where as 45% patients required cesarean section. Most common indication for cesarean section was meconium stained liquor with fetal distress (25%). 42% of the babies born needed NICU admission. Most common maternal complication seen was Postpartum Hemorrhage.

Conclusions: The present study we conclude that postdated pregnancy was associated with significant risk of perinatal complications such as fetal distress, meconium aspiration syndrome and IUGR. There was increased risk of obstetric complications as well like atonic PPH, oligohydramnios, obstructed labor.

Author Biographies

Ritika Narayan, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India

JUNIOR RESIDENT

DEPARTMENT OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY

Sheela S. R., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sir Devraj Urs Medical College, Kolar, Karnataka, India

Professor and Head of Department
Department of Obsterics and Gynaecology
Sir devraj Urs Medical College

References

Chabra, Shilpi MD. Post term, postdates and prolonged pregnancy. Obst Gynecol. 2015;125(4):980-1.

Galal M, Symonds I. Post term pregnancy: facts views and vision. Obst Gynecol. 2012;4(3):175-87.

Schoen C, Campbell S, Maratas A, Kim C. Anaphylaxis to buccal misoprostol for labor induction. Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;124(I):466-8.

Bhriegu R, Agarwal M, Hariharan C. Assessment of maternal and perinatal outcome in postdated pregnancies. Journal DMIMSDU. 2017;12(1):35-40.

Neilson JP. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2:CD000182).

Crowley P. The Cochrane Library. Chicester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2004. Interventions for preventing or improving the outcome of delivery at or beyond term (Cochrane review).

Mogren I, Stenlund H, Hogberg U. Recurrence of prolonged pregnancy. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:253-7.

Divon MY, Ferber A, Nisell H. Male gender predisposes to prolongation of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1081-3.

Kiran TS, Hemmadi S, Bethel J. Outcome of pregnancy in a woman with an increased body mass index. BJOG. 2005;112:768-72.

Laursen M, Bille C, Olesen AW. Genetic influence on prolonged gestation: a population-based Danish twin study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:489-94.

Jones JP, Fox H. Ultrastructure of placenta in prolonged pregnancy. J Pathol. 1978;126(3):173-9.

Hilder L, Costeloe K, Thilaganathan B. Prolonged pregnancy: evaluating gestation-specific risks of fetal and infant mortality. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:169-73.

Hannah ME. Postterm pregnancy: should all women have labour induced? a review of the literature. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 1993;5:3.

Berkowitz K, Garite T, Global Library of Women’s Medicine. 2008:1756-2228.

Alexander JM. Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation. Obst Gynecol. 2017;96(2):291-4.

Vorherr H. Placental insufficiency in relation to post term pregnancy and fetal post maturity: Evaluation of fetoplacental function; management of the post term gravida. Am J Obst Gynecol. 1975;123(1):67-103.

Kumari R, Singh M. Observational study on mode of delivery in pregnancy beyond expected date of delivery at rims ranchi. IOSR J Dental Med. 2018;17(8):61-4.

Kandalgaonkar VK, Kose V. Fetomaternal Outcome in postdated pregnancy. 2019;8(5):1899-906.

Mahapatro A. Fetomaternal outcome in pregnancy beyond 40 weeks. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2015;6:53-8.

Eden RD, Gergely RZ, Schifrin BS, Wade ME. Comparison of antepartum testing schemes for the management of the postdate pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:683-92.

Alexander JM, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:291-4.

Singhal P. Fetomaternal outcome following postdate pregnancy. a prospective study. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2001;51:89-93.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles