DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20201771

Socio-demographic profile and maternal-fetal prognosis of emergency caesarean section versus caesarean section programmed on scar uterus

Mapatano Shalamba E., Mwambali Nabintu, Nyakio Ngeleza O., Mukanga Omar, Mulindwa Murhula J., Mukwege Mukengere D.

Abstract


Background: The objective of this study was to determine the maternal-fetal prognosis of emergency caesarean sections on the scar uterus to contribute to the reduction of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality.

Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study of pregnant women who were observed from admission to discharge including their newborns at Panzi Reference General Hospital in gynecology and obstetrics department. The sample was comprehensive for convenience consisting of 150 deliveries by caesarean section who had previously delivered at least once by caesarean section. (In 4 months, from 01st December 2018 to 31st March 2019). A pre-established survey sheet allowed us to collect the data. For data analysis, SPSS software and Microsoft excel were used. The chi-square test was used at the 0.05 level.

Results: A total 95.2% of newborns were found to be of normal weight, their mothers were emergency cesarized but should be programmed and macrosomia was noted in 4.8%; (p >0.05). In addition, 57.1% of urgent caesarean sections scheduled to be performed were performed in female children (p <0.05). We note the low Apgar in 26.2% of newborns whose mothers were emergency cesarized but should be programmed; (p <0.05). Afterwards, 33.3% of the emergency cesarized gestates, their newborns were transferred to neonatology with transfer reasons asphyxia light in 50%, moderate asphyxia in 28.5% and in 21.5% for the infectious risk. The neonatal prognosis at discharge, we noted two cases of neonatal deaths or 4.7% in pregnant emergency cesarized (p >0.05). On the maternal side, morbidity was dominated by puerperal infections in 16.7% and uterine rupture in 2.4% in the emergency caesarean section, and no maternal deaths occurred in both groups during the study period.

Conclusions: Maternal-fetal prognosis was characterized by asphyxia, neonatal infection and two cases of neonatal death. Study did not register a maternal death but we noticed puerperal infections.


Keywords


Emergency caesarean section, Maternal-fetal prognosis, Planned cesarean section

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dujardin B, Mine F, De Brouwere V. Improving maternal health: a guide for systemic action. The Harmattan. 2014:310.

Kim YM, Tappis H, Zainullah P, Ansari N, Evans C, Bartlett L, et al. Quality of caesarean delivery services and documentation in first-line referral facilities in Afghanistan: a chart review. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2012;12:14.

Kaboré C, Ridde V, Kouanda S, Agier I, Queuille L, Dumont A. Determinants of non-medically Indicated cesarean deliveries in Burkina Faso. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135 Suppl 1:S58-S63.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015;3(5):e260-70.

Dhodapkar SB, Bhairavi S, Daniel M, Chauhan NS, Chauhan RC. Analysis of caesarean sections according to Robson’s ten group classification system at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:745-9.

Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463-4.

Elshani B, Daci A, Gashi S, Lulaj S. The incidence of caesarean sections in the university clinical center of Kosovo. Acta Inform Med. 2012;20(4):244-8.

de la Santé OM. Déclaration de l'OMS sur les taux de césarienne. Genève. OMS. 2014.

Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Guelmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PloS One. 2014;9(6):e97769.

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM, WHO working group on caesarean section. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;123(5):667-70.

Faye DM, Moreira P, Tamofo E, Diouf AA, Moreau JC. Monitoring of pregnancies on scar uterus: Qualitative aspects and prognostic implications. Artic Orig Health Medicine. Artic Orig Health Medicine Too. 2014;24:409-15.

Traoré B, Kokaina C, Beye SA, Traoré M, Dolo A. Cesarean section at the Ségou regional hospital center in Mali. Med Afr Noire. 2010;57(11):513-8.

Al Rowaily MA, Alsalem FA, Abolfotouh MA. Cesarean section in a high-parity community in Saudi Arabia: clinical indications and obstrics outcomes. BMC Preg Childbirth. 22014;2014:14-92.

Maroyi R. Déterminanats de la morbidité maerno-infantile sur utérus multicicatriciel dans 5 hopitaux au Sud-Kivu. Pub Votre Trava. 2017.

Yaïch P, Ouattara A, Koffi N. Caesareans in emergency: maternal-fetal prognosis at CHU Cocody Abidjan. Af J Anesthesia Emerg Med. 2012;2012.

Benzouina S, Boubkraoui ME, Mrabet M, Chahid N, Kharbach A, Elhassani A, Barkat A. Fetal outcome in emergency versus elective cesarean sections at Souissi Maternity Hospital, Rabat, Morocco. Pan African Medical Journal. 2016;23(1):1-10.

Foumane P, Koh VM, Minkande JZ, Ngantcha EN, Dohbit JS, Mboudou ÉT. Risk factors and prognosis of emergency cesarean delivery at the Yaounde Women's and Children's Hospital, Cameroon. Medecine et Sante Tropicales. 2014;24(1):89-93.

Mbungu MR, Ntela MJ, Kahindo MP. Frequency of CLRs according to the ROBSON classification in 3 maternity wards in the city of KINSHASA in the DRC. 2017;10(2):2535-44.

Sawadogo YA, Komboigo E, Kiemtore S, Zamane H, Ouedraogo I, Kain DP, et al. Post cesarean parietal suppurations at the Center Hospitalier Universitaire Yalgado Ouedraogo, Burkina-Faso: epidemiological, clinical, therapeutic and prognostic aspects. Pan African Med J. 2019:32.

Maleya A, Kakudji YK, Mwazaz RM, Nsambi JB, Ngwej HI, Mukuku O, et al. Maternal-fetal outcomes of untreated pregnancies in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic du Congo. Pan African Med J. 2019;33.

Baldé IS, Diallo FB, Diallo MH, Sylla I, Bah EM, Mamy MN, et al. Quality assessment of the last prenatal consultation in a peripheral maternity hospital in Conakry, Guinea. J Peri Med. 2016;8(1):39-45.

Suivi B. Monitoring and orientation of pregnant women according to identified risk situations. La Revue Sage-Femme. 2007;6(4):216-8.

Samake BM et All. Factors of morbidity and mortality of caesarean section at the Gabrielle touré university hospital in BAMAKO. Mali Méd. 2017;32:2.

De Brouwere V, Van Lerberghe W. Reducing the risks of maternity: Strategies and scientific evidence. Studies in HSO, 2001. Available at: http://dspace.itg.be/bitstream/handle/10390/1514/shsop18.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on 10th December 2019.

World Health Organization. Standards for improving the quality of maternal and newborn care in health facilities. OMS 2017. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254673/9789242511215-fre.pdf. Accessed on 10th December 2019.

Traoré Y, Teguete I, Dolo A, Dicko F, Diallo A. Childbirth in a context of scar uterus at the CHU Gabriel Touré from January 2007 to December 2008: methods and complications. Black Af Med. 2012;59(11):511-6.

Aboubakari AS, Azoumah D, Agbetra N, Adama H, Akpadza K. Methods and complications of childbirth after cesarean section at CHU Kara. Med Afr Noire. 2009;56(3):4-8.

Sima Ole B, Bang Ntamack J, Obame R, Bibang F, Mewie Lendzinga A, Nzogue Nguema JP, et al. Cicatricial uterus: Epidemiological aspects and method of childbirth at the maternity hospital of UWENDO CHU in GABON. 2017:29.

B Kinzie, Gomez P. Basic maternal and new born care: A guide for skilled providers 2014. Avalable at: https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/resource/basic-maternal-and-newborn-care-a-guide-for-skilled-providers/Accessed 23 December 2017.

Cissé CT, Ewagnignon E, Terolbe I, Diadhiou F. Childbirth on scar uterus at the Dakar CHU. J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1999;28(6):556-62.

Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: result of a 5 year multi-center collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:750-4.

Benzineb N, Bellasfar M, Bouguerra B, Amri MT, Sfar R. Childbirth by vaginal route after cesarean. Rev Fr Gynécol Obstét. 1998;93:282-4.

De Saint Hilaire P, Gaucherand P, Bagou G, Rudigoz RC. Pregnancy and scar uterus. Encycl Medicines Chir Paris, Obstetrics. 1992;16:5-030-20.

Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. New Eng J Med. 2004;351(25):2581-9.

Vercoustre L, Roman H. Trial of work in case of anterior caesarean: review of the literature. J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;35(1):35-45.

Kamath BD, Todd JK, Glazner JE, Lezotte D, Lynch AM. Neonatal outcomes after elective cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1231.

Elveđi-Gašparović V, Klepac-Pulanić T, Peter B. Maternal and fetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean section in a developing country. Coll Antropol. 2006;30(1):113-8.

Subedi A, Shrestha J, Adhikari KM, Shrestha A, Gurung S. Comparison of maternal and perinatal outcome in elective and emergency cesarean section in a tertiary care centre. Birat J Health Sci. 2019;4(1):616-20.

Sichundu P, Siziya S, Kumoyo M. Rate, indica ons and fetal outcome of emergency caesarean sec on-a retrospec ve study at ndola Teaching Hospital, Ndola, Zambia. Asian Pacific J Health Sci. 2017;4(2):162-7.

Ugwu EO, Obioha KC, Okezie OA, Ugwu AO. A five-year survey of caesarean delivery at a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Anna Med Health Sci Res. 2011;1(1):77-84.

Ayano B, Guto A. Indications and outcomes of emergency caesarean section at St Paul’s Hospital Medical college, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2017:(afoul month retrospective cohort study). Gynecol Reprod Health. 2018;2(5):1-2.

Boneau C, Nizard J. Bonneau C, Nizard J. Management of pregnancies with a scar uterus: state of knowledge. J Gynécol Obstét Biol Reprod 2012;41(6):497-511.

Koulimaya-Gombet CE, Diouf AA, Diallo M, Dia A, Sène C, Moreau JC, Diouf A. Pregnancy and childbirth of patients with a history of cesarean section in Dakar: epidemiological clinical therapeutic and prognostic aspects. Pan Af Med J. 2017;27:1.

Scheller A, Terinde R. Comparison of the rate of complications after primary, secondary and emergency Cesarean section. J Obstet Perinatol. 1992;196(6):253-60.

Fitzpatrick KE, Kurinczuk JJ, Bhattacharya S, Quigley MA. Planned mode of delivery after previous cesarean section and short-term maternal and perinatal outcomes: A population-based record linkage cohort study in Scotland. PLoS Med. 2019;16(9):e1002913.

Koh VM, Essome H, Sama JD, Foumane P. Childbirth on scar uterus in resource-poor countries: care and becoming a mother-foetal. Pan African Med J. 2018;30:1.

Dembélé A, Tarnagda Z, Ouédraogo JL, Thiombiano O, Bambara M. Result of deliveries on scar uterus in a university hospital in Burkina. Pan African Med J. 2012;12:95-102.