DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20194871

Analysis of success of vaginal birth after cesarean in relation to indication of primary caesarean section: a tertiary care experience

Neha Gupta, Arpita De, Nidhi Gupta

Abstract


Background: Apprehensions related to vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) has reduced rates of successful vaginal trials over last decade. The objective of this study was to identify the indications of first caesarean section that can lead to a successful trial of labour in subsequent pregnancy.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study was done between November 2014 and October 2017. Data from the case records was analysed.

Results: Study over 3 years from 2014 to 2017 revealed fetal distress (82.7%),  breech (72.2%), transverse lie (66.7%), antepartum haemorrhage (56.2%) and twins with first non-cephalic (57.9%) have successful outcome of VBAC whereas obstructed labour (19.2%) and failed induction (18.4%) in previous pregnancy have poor outcome for VBAC.

Conclusions: Attempts to allow trial of labour after one previous caesarean section with fetal distress, malpresentation and twins as indications of caesarean in previous pregnancy are safe and should be encouraged.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Indication, Primary, Success, Trial of labour, Vaginal birth after cesarean

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cragin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. NY Med J. 1916;104:1-3,

Simões R, Bernardo WM, Salomão AJ, Baracat EC; Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologiae Obstetrícia (Febrasgo).; Associação Médica Brasileira (AMB). Birth route in case of cesarean section in a previous pregnancy. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2015;61(3):196-202.

Balachandran L, Vaswani PR, Mogotlane R. Pregnancy outcome in women with previous one cesarean section. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(2):99-102.

Gupta N, De A, Batra S. VBAC: changes over last 10 years. J Obstret Gyne India. 2019;69(2):110-4.

Christmann-Schmid C, Raio L, Scheibner K, Müller M, Surbek D. Back to once a caesarean: always a caesarean? A trend analysis in Switzerland. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016;294(5):905-10.

Kyvernitakis I, Reichelt J, Kyvernitakis A, Misselwitz B, Hadji P, Schmidt S, et al. Trends of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Germany from 1990 to 2012: a population-based study. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2014;218(5):203-9.

Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and Risks of Elective Cesarean Section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29-30):489-95.

Daniel CN, Singh S. Caesarean delivery: An experience from a tertiary institution in north western Nigeria Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(1):18-24.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates, global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

Prakash KC, Neupane S. Cesarean deliveries among Nepalese mothers: changes over time 2001-2011 and determinants. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(2):421-7.

Nilsson C, van Limbeek E, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Lundgren I. Vaginal birth after Cesarean: views of women from countries with high VBAC rates. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(3):325.

Lundgren I, Smith V, Nilsson C, Vehvilainen-Julkunen K, Nicoletti J, Devane D, et al. pregnancy childbirth. clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review. BMC. 2015;15:16.

Lundgren I, Healy P, Carroll M, Begley C, Matterne A, Gross MM, et al. Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16(1):350.