Email this article Perspectives of health care professionals on artificial insemination of donor semen: appraising their knowledge and perceptions: a single institution study in Nigeria
Abstract
Background: Artificial inseminations of donor semen (AID) involve use of heterologous donated semen for conception in infertile couple when indicated or in a single woman desirous of pregnancy. Its practice often requires regulation to address possible ethical and legal issues which may arise. In formulating acceptable guidelines/policies, the perspectives of health professionals and the participants should be considered. Therefore, we sought to explore the knowledge and perception of semen donation for artificial insemination among health professionals.
Methods: A cross sectional study conducted on consenting health workers in a single health institution using a structured questionnaire to assess their knowledge and perception on artificial insemination of donor semen (AID). Descriptive and analytical statistics were applied to the data collected with a statistically significant value of <0.05.
Results: One hundred and twenty-one health professionals completed the questionnaires. The mean age of the respondents was 27.58±5.5years. Sixty of the respondents were males while 61 were females. Eighty-four of the respondents (69.4%) demonstrated good knowledge of AID while 37 (30.6%) had poor knowledge. Cadre of health professionals and marital status influenced the knowledge of respondents. Perceptions on AID varied among the respondents mostly influenced by psycho-social factors and possible legal disputes on third party reproductive process. None of the male respondents has ever donated semen and willingness to donate semen was low; with anonymity preferred by the willing donors.
Conclusions: Substantial knowledge gap of AIDS existed among health professionals which were influenced by cadre and marital status. Psycho-social factors and possible legal disputes influenced their perceptions of AID.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Oguntoyinbo AE, Amole AOD, Komolafe OF. Sonographic assessment of fallopian tube patency in the investigation of female infertility in Ilorin, Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2001;5:100-5.
Panti AA, Sununu YT. The profile of infertility in a teaching Hospital in North West Nigeria. Sahel Med J. 2014;17(1):7-11.
Inhorn MC. Global infertility and the globalization of new reproductive technologies: illustrations from Egypt. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(9):1837-51.
Ikechebelu JI, Adinma JIB, Orie EF, Ikegwuonu SO. High prevalence of male infertility in southeastern Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;23(6):657-9.
Owolabi AT, Fasubaa OB, Ogunniyi SO. Semen quality of male partners of infertile couples in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2013;16(1):37-40.
Male factor infertility: Management approach. BMJ Best practices. Available at: http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph /497/treatment/step-by-step.html. Accessed on April 6th, 2019.
Practice committees of the American Society for Reproductive medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;9(1):47-62.e1.
Botchan A, Hauser R, Gamzu R, Yogev L, Paz G, Yavetz H. Results of 6139 artificial insemination cycles with donor spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2298-304.
Strickler RC, Keller DW, Warren JC. Artificial insemination with fresh donor semen. N Engl J Med. 1975;293(17):848-53.
Ugwu EO, Odoh GU, Obi SN, Ezugwu FO. Acceptability of artificial donor insemination among infertile couples in Enugu, southeastern Nigeria. Int J Womens Health. 2014;6:201-5.
Gong D, Liu YL, Zheng Z, Tian YF, Li Z. An overview on ethical issues about sperm donation. Asian J Androl. 2009;11(6):645-52.
Ping P, Zhu WB, Zhang XZ. Sperm donation and its application in China: a 7-year multicenter retrospective study. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(4):644-8.
Golombok S, Scott R, Appleby JB. Regulating Reproductive Donation. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2016.
Welcome to the HFEA, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Available at: https://www.hfea.gov.uk/. Accessed on April 13th, 2019.
Cutilli CC. Seeking health information: what sources do your patients use? Orthop Nurs. 2010;29(3):214-9.
Hesse BW, Nelson DE, Kreps GL. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(22):2618-24.
Medicine EC of the AS for R. Interests, obligations, and rights in gamete donation: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):675-81.
Hummel WP, Talbert LM. Current management of a donor insemination program. Fertil Steril. 1989;51(6):919-30.
Report on the regulation of reproductive cell donation in the European Union. 2006. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/human_substance/documents/tissues_frep_en.pdf. Accessed April 8th, 2019.
O’Reilly D, Bowen JM, Perampaladas K, Qureshi R, Xie F, Hughes E. Feasibility of an altruistic sperm donation program in Canada: results from a population-based model. Reprod Health. 2017;14(1):8.
Frith L, Blyth E, Farrand A. UK gamete donors’ reflections on the removal of anonymity: implications for recruitment. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1675-80.
