DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20193045

New improvements in increasing trends of caesarean section: to compare the effectiveness of two techniques Misgav Ladach with Joel Cohen incision versus Munro Kerr with pfannenstiel incision for caesarean section

Kanchan Sharma, Ankita Mani

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section (C-section) is the most common surgery among women worldwide, and the global rate of this surgical procedure has been continuously rising. Hence, it is significantly crucial to develop and apply highly effective and safe caesarean section techniques. In this study, we aimed at assessing the safety and effectiveness of the Joel-Cohen-based Misgav Ladach technique and comparing the results with the transverse Pfannenstiel incision (Munro Kerr) for C-section.

Methods: It was a prospective randomised controlled trial conducted on 100 women undergoing caesarean section at Patna Medical College and hospital in 2017. Patients were randomly allocated in 2 groups  and intra operative  and postoperative findings (blood loss, duration of surgery, post op fever, wound complication, APGAR scores etc. were calculated.

Results: The duration of surgery was significantly low in Misgav Ladach technique (19.9 minutes vs. 29.54 minutes p value <0.001) Misgav technique was found economically better method as only 1 suture was used in 43 patients (p value<0.001). Post operative recovery (ambulation and bowel transit time) was found much early in Misgav Ladach vs. Munro Kerr (p value <0.001).Post operative use of analgesics was significantly less in Misgav technique (p value <0.0001). However no significant difference was observed in incidence of postoperative fever, blood loss and mean APGAR scoring of neonates.

Conclusions: From this study it can be concluded that Misgav ladach method of caesarean section is associated with better short time post operative outcomes, especially resulting in reduction of pain and postoperative hospital stay.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Joel-Cohen, Misgav-Ladach, Modified Misgav-Ladach, Pfannenstiel

Full Text:

PDF

References


Xavier P, Ayres-De-Campos D, Reynolds A, Guimarães M, Costa-Santos C, Patrício B. The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the PfannenstielKerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(9):878-82.

World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436-7.

Gedikbasi A, Akyol A, Ulker V, Yildirim D, Arslan O, Karaman E, et al. Cesarean techniques in cases with one previous cesarean delivery: comparison of modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr. Arch Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;283(4):711-6.

Joel Cohen S. Abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. New techniques based on time and motion studies 2nd ed. Ed. W.H. Heinemann, London. William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd; 1972:8-11.

Stark M. Technique of Caesarean Section: the Misgav Ladach method. Women’s Health Today, Eds Popkin DR, Peddle LJ. Montreal, the Parthenon Publishing Group. 1994;10:81-5.

Naki MM, Api O, Celik H, Kars B, Yaşar E, Unal O. Comparative study of Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr cesarean techniques: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neanatal Med. 2011;24(2):239-44.

Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynecologist (RCOG). Clinical Guideline April 2004 Caesarean Section, Clinical Guideline April 2004 National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; Published by the RCOG Press at the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 27 Sussex Place, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4RG57 (11); 2002:725.

Poonam, Banerjee B, Singh SN, Raina A. The Misgav Ladach method: A step forward in the operative technique of caesarean section. Kathmandu University Med J. 2006;4:198-202.

Moreira P, Moreau JC, Faye ME, Ka S, Kane Gueye SM, Faye EO et al. Comparison of two cesarean techniques: classic versus Misgav Ladach cesarean. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2002;31:572-6.

Popiela A, Pańszczyk M, Korzeniewski J, Baranowski W. Comparative clinical analysis of cesarean section technique by Misgav Ladach method and Pfennenstiel method. Ginekol Pol. 2000;71:255-7.

Ferrari AG, Frigerio LG, Candotti G, Buscaglia M, Petrone M, Taglioretti A, et al. Can Joel‐Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity? Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2001;72(2):135-43.

Darj E, Nordstrom ML. The Misgav-Ladach method for cesarean section compared to the Pfannenstiel method. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78:37-41.