Analytical study to assess fetal and perinatal outcome in booked and unbooked obstetric cases

Authors

  • Sapna Chourasia Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Kamlesh Yadav Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and PGI, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20164658

Keywords:

Booked cases, Fetal outcome, Maternal mortality, Obstetric care, Unbooked cases

Abstract

Background: The high perinatal mortality rates are indicators of the poor state of health services and it is pertinent to determine the relationship between the booking status of mother and fetal outcomes.

Methods: In the present randomized prospective study of 400 unbooked (study group) obstetric cases were evaluated and compared with 400 booked (control group) obstetric cases over a period of one year.

Results: Perinatal outcomes of women in study group were significantly poorer than women in control group due to high preterm delivery, LBW, with low Apgar score at five minutes, with more NICU admission due to RDS, with high perinatal mortality in term of IUD, early neonatal deaths in study group.

Conclusions: Findings of the study will help the programmers and service providers in identifying areas where emphasis has to be given in the development of strategies that will promote the utilization of antenatal services, to reduce adverse perinatal and fetal outcome.

References

Abou Zahr C, Wardlaw T. Maternal mortality in 2000: estimates by WHO, UNICEF and UNFPA. Geneva: 2001.

Ekele BA, Audu LR. Gestational age at first antenatal attendance in Sokoto, Northern Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;15:39-40.

Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Look PFV. WHO analysis of causes of maternal deaths: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367:1066-74.

Kennare RM, Keirse MJ, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Perinatal death associates with planned home birth in Australia: population based study. BMJ. 2005;317:384-8.

Pokharel HP, Lama GJ, Banerjee B, Paudel LS, PK Pokharel. Maternal and Perinatal outcome among the booked and unbooked pregnancies. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2007;88(2):168-72.

Rani M, Bonu S, Harvey S. Differentials in the quality of antenatal care in India. Int J Quality Healt Care. 2008;20(1):62-71.

Chigbu B, Onwere S, Kamanu CI, Aluka C, Okoro O, Adibe E. Pregnancy Outcome in Booked and Unbooked Mothers in South Eastern Nigeria. East Afr Med J. 2009;86(6):267-.

Gonied AS. Maternal Complications and Perinatal Outcomes in Booked and Unbooked Mothers. Journal of American Science. 2011;7(10):792-6.

Kaur J, Kaur K. Does an Antenatal Care make a difference? Hum Bio Rev. 2013;2(2):120-35.

Owolabi AT, Fatusi AO, Kuti O, Adeyemi A, Faturoti SO, Obiajuwa PO. Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked Nigerian mothers. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(7):526-31.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-20

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles