DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20192413

Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe and effective surgical management of early pregnancy loss

Aishah Azman, Noor Asikin Mohd Sakri, Nor Adibah Mohd Kusni, Nurul Hidayah Mansor, Zahar Azuar Zakaria

Abstract


Background: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) is an alternative to the standard sharp uterine curettage, performed under local anaesthetic or sedation in the daycare setting. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and safety of MVA, the pain perception and the factors related to it.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 58 consecutive patients who had undergone Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) in Early Pregnancy Assessment Clinic, Hospital Kemaman between January and December 2017. Data on the patients’ characteristics and the procedures were analysed.

Results: The efficacy of the procedure was 96.5% (56/58) with no major complication recorded. Majority of the patients (91.3%) reported mild to moderate pain with 2/3 of them agreed to undergo MVA in the future and would recommend it to other patients. There was no significant difference in mean pain score between different groups of women (parity, education levels, occupations, previous uterine evacuation) or procedural techniques (analgesia, sedation, cervical block, cervical dilatation, procedure duration, number of aspiration passes).

Conclusions: MVA is safe and well accepted procedure for out-patient surgical evacuation of early miscarriages.


Keywords


Early pregnancy loss, Manual vacuum aspiration, Miscarriage, Surgical evacuation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Wu Y, Wu X. A report of 300 cases using vacuum aspiration for the termination of pregnancy. Chinese J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;447-9.

Karman H, Malcom P. Very early abortion using syringe as vacuum source. The Lancet. 1972;299(7759):1051-2.

Todd CS, Soler ME, Castleman L, Rogers MK, Blumenthal PD. Manual vacuum aspiration for second-trimester pregnancy termination. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(1):5-9.

Milingos DS, Mathur M, Smith NC, Ashok PW. Manual vacuum aspiration: a safe alternative for the surgical management of early pregnancy loss. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1268-71.

Edelman A, Nichols MD, Jensen J. Comparison of pain and time of procedures with two first-trimester abortion techniques performed by residents and faculty. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(7):1564-7.

Gómez PI, Gaitán H, Nova C, Paradas A. Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(5 Pt 1):943-51.

Hamoda H, Flett GM, Ashok PW, Templeton A. Surgical abortion using manual vacuum aspiration under local anaesthesia: a pilot study of feasibility and women's acceptability. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2005;31(3):185-8.

López JC1, Vigil-De Gracia P, Vega-Malek JC, Ruiz E, Vergara V. A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99(2):91-4.

Iftikhar G, Abbad Gilani ST. Comparison of manual vacuum aspiration and sharp curettage in the treatment of first trimester abortions. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2014;64(4):541-5.

Pillai M, Welsh V, Sedgeman K, Gazet AC, Staddon J, Carter H. Introduction of a manual vacuum aspiration service: a model of service within a NHS Sexual Health Service. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(1):27-32.

Ansari A, Abbas S. Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) - A safe option for evacuation of first trimester miscarriage in cardiac patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(6):948-50.

Mankowski JL1, Kingston J, Moran T, Nager CW, Lukacz ES. Paracervical compared with intra-cervical lidocaine for suction curettage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(5):1052-7.

Celentano C, Prefumo F, Di Andrea O, Presti F, Di Nisio Q, Rotmensch S. Oral misoprostol vs. vaginal gemeprost prior to surgical termination of pregnancy in nulliparae. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(8):764-8.

Svendsen PF, Rørbye C, Vejborg T, Nilas L. Comparison of gemeprost and vaginal misoprostol in first trimester mifepristone-induced abortion. Contraception. 2005;72(1):28-32.

Edward J, Creinin MD. Early abortion: surgical and medical options. Curr Prob Obstet Gynecol Fertil. 1997;20(1):6–32.

Westfall JM, Sophocles A, Burggraf H, Ellis S. Manual vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7(6):559-62.

Zhang J, Gilles JM, Barnhart K, Creinin MD, Westhoff C, Frederick MM, et al. A comparison of medical management with misoprostol and surgical management for early pregnancy failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(8):761-9.

Wen J, Cai Q, Deng F, Li Y. Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for first-trimester abortion: a systematic review. BJOG. 2008;115(1):5-13.

White K, Carroll E, Grossman D. Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: a systematic review of the literature. Contraception. 2015;92(5):422-38.

Miller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA. A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(4):600-4.