DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20192450

Comparative study of intra and post-operative complications between total abdominal hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

S. Nithya Priya, S. Senthil Priya, S. Allirathnam, S. Nithya, R. Shankar

Abstract


Background: Vaginal hysterectomy is preferable due to faster recovery, decreased morbidity and absence of an abdominal incision. The aim was to compare the risks and complications of laparoscopy assisted vaginal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy in terms of intra-operative and post-operative complications.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted in the Gynaecology ward at Vinakaya Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospitals, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The data for the past 1-year record was taken for analysis. A total of 80 subjects were included in the study and were divided into two groups with 40 patients under TAH (total abdominal hysterectomy) group and 40 under LAVH (Laproscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy) group. The primary outcome of the present analysis was incidence of perioperative complications like blood loss and the secondary outcomes were operating time, blood loss, urinary tract injury, rate of conversion to laparotomy, postoperative pain, and length of postoperative stay.

Results: The mean intra-operative blood loss was measured among both the groups and it was found to be very high among TAH group (201 ml) compared to LAVH group (149.8 ml) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). Similarly, the duration of operative procedure was found to be less in LAVH group (57.9 mins) compared to TAH group (72.6 mins) and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05). Post-operative wound infection (14 vs 0) was found to be more among the patients in TAH group than that of the LAVH group and the difference was found to be statistically significant (p <0.05).

Conclusions: LAVH is a safe and effective surgical treatment for benign gynaecological diseases and should be offered whenever possible, taking into account the low rate of complications and cost-effectiveness.


Keywords


Intra and post-operative complications, Laproscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy, Total abdominal hysterectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Singh KC, Barman SD, Sengupta R. Choice of hysterectomy for benign disease department of obstetrics and Gynecology University college of medical sciences, Delhi. J Ohstet Gynecol Ind. 2004;54(4):365-70.

Reich H. Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications techniques and outcomes. Cur Open Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:337-44.

Shirlina D, Shirish S. Uterine volume. an aid to determine the route and technique of hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol Ind. 2004;54(1):65-72.

Wang CJ, Yuven LT, Yen CF, Lec CL, Soong YK. A simplified method to decrease operative blood was in LAVH for large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(3):370-3.

Lyons TL, Adolph AJ, Winer WK. Laproscopic supracervical hysterectomy for large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004:11(2):170-4.

Wattiez A. Soriano D. Fiaccavento A. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very enlarged uteri. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(2):125-30.

Falcone T, Walters M. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:753-67.

Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;CD003677.

Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1561-5.

Walsh CA, Walsh SR, Tang TY, Slack M. Total abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;144:3-7.

Chang WC , Hsu WC, Shew BC, Hang SC, Toong PL, Chang PY. Minimizing bladder injury in LAVH amoung women with previous cesarean section surg endosc. 2008;22;171-6.

Sinha R, Sundaram M, Lakhotia S, Hedge A, Kadam P. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in women with Previous caesarean section J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(14):513-7.

Rock JA, Jones HW. Hysterectomy. In: Te Linde, eds. Operative Gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2003: 799-808.

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rate in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1091-5.

Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit. 2008;14:CR24-31.

Akbay EF, Harmanli OH, Panganamamula UR, Abay M, Gaughan J, Chatwani AJ. Hysterectomy in obese women: a comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:710-4.

Reich H. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques, and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:337-44.

Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E, Garcea N, Paprella P, Catalano GF. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:270-5.

McCracken G, Hunter D, Morgan D, Price JH. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy. Ulster Med J. 2006;75:54-8.

Hidlenbaugh D, O’ Mara P, Conboy E. Clinical and financial analyses of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparoscop. 1994;1:357-61.

Kulvanitchaiyanunt A. A retrospective and comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87:745-9.

Tsaltas J, Magnus A, Mamers PM, Lawrence AS, Lolatgis N, Healy DL. Laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy: a cost comparison. Med J Aust. 1997;166: 205-7.

Tsai EM, Chen HS, Long CY, Yang CH, Hsu SC, Wu CH, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55:105-9.

Frigerio L, Gallo A, Ghezzi F, Trezzi G, Lussana M, Franchi M. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93:209-13.

Lowell L, Kessler AA. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a suitable substitute for abdominal hysterectomy?. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:738-42.

Carter JE, Ryoo J, Kartz A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case control comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994;1:116-21.

Jaturasrivilai P. A comparative study between laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90:837-84.

Meikle SF, Nugent EW, Orleans M. Complications and recovery from laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:304-11.