DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20192433

Current practices in family planning: a population based study

Asmita Kaundal, Rohini Sehgal, Garima Kachhawa, Sunesh Kumar, Alka Kriplani, P. Vanamail

Abstract


Background: To study the knowledge, current practices of family planning methods and acceptance post motivation.

Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted at family planning OPD of AIIMS, New Delhi, India. A total of 1516 couples who came for MTP at any gestation couple were enquired about knowledge, currently used contraceptive method and reason for abortion. Couple was counseled and allowed to choose contraceptive method using cafeteria approach. Mean values of continuous data were tested using t-test/ANOVA. Categorial data were compared using chi-square/ Fischers exact test.

Results: Mean±SD age of the women was 28.89±5.21 years with 9.98±4.56 weeks POG. Around 81% of women had one or more living children with 62.67% women with at least one abortion previously. Majority used male condoms (42.10%) followed by natural method (21.01%), Cu-T (3.80%), OCPs (1.65%), injectable (0.30%), I-pill (0.24%). Awareness was maximum for male condoms, Cu-T, OCPs, female sterilization (100%) and least for female condoms (20%) and LNG-IUS (8.46%). Contraceptive failure (68.90%), congenital abnormality in the fetus (22.40%), maternal disease (5.90%), rape (1.60%), completed family (0.80%) and not using any method (0.30%) were the reasons of abortion. Majority of abortions were in first trimester (70%). Post-motivation around 69.30% of the couples accepted some form of contraception. Female sterilization (32.50%) method accepted by the couples as compares to temporary methods (36.70%) such as Cu-T, OCPs, Injectables etc.

Conclusions: Despite of awareness the family planning programme is unsuccessful largely due to inappropriate attitude. Behavioral modification and communication goes a long way to slove the problem.


Keywords


Awareness, Behavioral modification, Contraception, Family planning methods, Post-motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


National Population Policy: Yojana. 1983;26;27(1-2):55-6.

Sangwan N, Maru RM. The target-free approach: An overview: J Health Manag. 1999;1(1);71-96.

Chaurasia AR, Singh R. 40 years of planned family planning efforts in India. Available at; https://iussp.org/en/event/17/programme/paper/5465.

The medical termination of pregnancy Act, 1971 (Act No. 34 of 1971). Available at; http://tcw.nic.in/Acts/MTP-Act-1971.pdf.

Mittal S. Introduction of emergency contraception in India; J Indian Med Assoc. 2006;104(9)499-502, 504-5.

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A. Global caused of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Global Heatlth. 2014;2:e323-33.

Montgomery AL, Ram U, Kumar R, Jha P. For the million death study collaborators maternal mortality in India: causes and healthcare service use based on a nationally representative survey. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e83331.

Singh S, Shekhar C, Acharya R. Moore AM, Stillman M. The incidence of abortion and unintended pregnancies in India, 2015. Lancet Global Health. 2018;6(1):e111-20.

India, Mumbai: IIPS; December 2017. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4). 2015-16.

Nove A, Matthews Z, Neal S, Camacho AV. Maternal mortality in adolescent compared with women of other ages: evidence from 144 countries. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e155-164.

Kassa GM, Arowojolu AO, Odukogbe AA, Yalew AW. Prevalence and determinants of adolescent pregnancy in Africa : A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Health. 2018;15(1):195.

WHO. Adolescent pregnancy-Unmet needs and undone deeds: a review of the literature and programmes, 2007. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43702/9789241595650_eng.pdf?sequence=1.

Peter M. World Health Organization‎. Pregnant adolescents : delivering on global promises of hope, 2006. World Health Organization. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43368.

Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, Eilers MA, Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy, birth and abortion rates across countries: Levels and trends. J Adolescent Health. 2015;56(2):223-0.

Reynolds HW, Wong EL, Tucker H. Adolescents’ use of maternal and child health services in developing countries. Int Persp Sexual Health Reprod Health. 2006;32(1):6-16.

Ganatra B, Hirve S. Induced abortion among adolescent women in rural Maharashtra, India. Reproductive Health Matters. 2002;10:76-85.

Moore AM, Singh S, Bankole A. Do women and men consider abortion as an alternative to contraception in united states? An exploratory study. Global Public health, An Int J Res Policy Pract. 2011;6(1):S25-37.

Pachauri S. Priority strategies for India’s family planning programme. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140(1):S137-S148.

Pachauri S. Expanding contraceptive choice in India: Issues and evidence. J Fam Welfare. 2004;50:13-25.

India, Mumbai: IIPS; 2007. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06.

Mumbai: IIPS; 2010. International Institute for Population Sciences, Population Council. Youth in India: Situation and needs 2006-2007. Available at; https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2010PGY_YouthInIndiaReport.pdf.

Pachauri S. Special Article. Male involvement in reproductive health care. J Indian Med Assoc. 2001;99:138-41.

Bhatnagar I, Khan ME, Hazra A. New Delhi: Population Council; 2011. Increasing acceptance of spacing methods in rural Bihar: Implications for behaviour change communication. Policy Brief No. 5.

Darmstadt GL, Tarigopula UK. Behavior change communication as an intervention to improve family health outcomes. J Fam Welfare. 2010;56:1-8.