Multiple vaginal examinations and early neonatal sepsis

Authors

  • Usha Christopher Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Karakonam, Kerala, India
  • Goldy S. J. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Karakonam, Kerala, India
  • Bewin Oral J. Department of Microbiology, Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Karakonam, Kerala, India
  • Adlin Rose C. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Somervell Memorial CSI Medical College and Hospital, Karakonam, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190848

Keywords:

EONS, Rupture of membranes, Vaginal examination

Abstract

Background: Early onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) is caused mainly by organisms present in the genital tract. Maternal risk factors increase the incidence of EONS. This study was done to find out the association between one such risk factor i.e., multiple vaginal examinations and EONS.

Methods: Case control study. 114 patients with three or more vaginal examinations after rupture of membranes were taken as cases and 114 patients with less than three vaginal examinations after rupture of membranes were taken as controls. All these babies were followed up for the development of EONS.

Results: Of the 114 cases, 6 babies developed EONS. None of the babies in the control group developed EONS. So, 3 or more vaginal examinations after rupture of membranes in labour is significantly associated with early onset neonatal sepsis with p-value of 0.01305.

Conclusions: Multiple vaginal examinations after rupture of membranes is a risk factor for early onset neonatal sepsis.

 

References

Bang AT, Bang RA, Bactule SB, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD. Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet. 1999;354:1955-61.

Stoll BJ. The global impact of neonatal infection. Clin Perinatol. 1997;24:1-21.

Report of the National Neonatal Perinatal Database (National Neonatology Forum) 2002-03.

Singh M, Narang A, Bhakoo ON. Predictive perinatal score in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. J Trop Pediatr. 1994;40(6):365-8.

Takkar VP, Bhakoo ON, Narang A. Scoring system for the prediction of early neonatal infections. Indian Pediatr. 1974;11:597-600.

Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer A. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(3):942-5.

Seaward PG, Hannah ME, Myhr TL, Farine D, Ohlsson A, Wang EE, et al. International multicenter term PROM study: evaluation of predictors of neonatal infection in infants born to patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(3):635-9.

Imseis HM, Trout WC, Gabbe SG. The microbiologic effect of digital cervical examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:578-80.

Warren C. Why should I do vaginal examinations? Pract Midwifery. 1999;2(6):12-3.

Cheyne H, Hundley V, Dowding D, Bland JM, McNamee P, Greer I, et al. Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2008;337(7683):1396-400.

World Health Organisation. Safe motherhood - care in normal birth: a practical guide. Geneva: WHO; 1997.

Stuart M. Midwives’ discourses on vaginal examination in labour. PhD thesis. University of West of England; 2008.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2007 clinical guideline 55: intrapartum care.

Borders N, Lawton R, Martin SR. A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in labor: a NOVEL idea. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57(2):139-44.

Shepherd A, Cheyne H. The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour. Women Birth. 2013;26(1):49-54.

Getahun D. Temporal trends in chorioamnionitis by maternal race/ethnicity and gestational age (1995-2010). Int J Reprod Med. 2013;2013:1-6.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles