DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20191205

An evaluation of abnormal puerperium

Aarti Jeenwal, Hemlata Jharbade, Nishita Singh

Abstract


Background: Puerperium is strictly defined as the period of confinement during and just after birth. It is the period following childbirth during which body tissues specially the genital organ reverts back approximately to the pre-pregnant state both anatomically and physiologically. At some stages some of these well-orchestrated changes can go away resulting in complications which can endanger life.

Methods: Retrospective c study was conducted in Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of M.G.M. Medical College and M. Y. Hospitals, Indore. The cases were selected randomly from the patient who were admitted in M.Y. Hospital who had either a vaginal or caesarean delivery (both in our institution as well as outside institution) during the study period, irrespective of age, parity and registration status. Data was recorded in predesigned coded case report forms and statistical analysis was performed.

Results: Authors found that puerperal pyrexia was the most common complication, accounting for 38.96% of total cases. The second most common complication was perineal pain affecting 28.15% of cases. The other complication was wound gaping/discharge (11.71%), mastitis and breast abscess (6.81%), secondary postpartum hemorrhage (5.33%), episiotomy gaping and infection (4%), perineal hematoma (0.59%), wound dehiscence (0.3%) and other rare causes accounted for 4.15% of the complication.

Conclusions: Puerperal period is as important as antenatal period. Anaemia, suboptimal personal hygiene as well as improper sterilization can resulted in severe health hazards such as septicemia, disseminated intravascular coagulation as well as death. So, risk factor should be treated vigorously.


Keywords


Infection, Perineal pain, Puerperal pyrexia, Wound gaping

Full Text:

PDF

References


van Dillen J, Zwart J, Schutte J, van Roosmalen J. Maternal sepsis: epidemiology, etiology and outcome. Current Opinion Infectious Dis. 2010;23(3):249-54.

BM Audu, UI Takai, M Buker. Trends in maternal mortality at university of Maiduguri teaching hospital, Maiduguri Nigeria-A five years review. 2010;51(4):147-51.

World Health Organization: Trends in maternal mortality 1990-2008. Estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA and World Bank, Geneva; 2010. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44423/9789241500265_eng.pdf;jsessionid=0E1A4272122C034F59575F65375287BC?sequence=1.

Khaskheli MN, Baloch S, Sheeba A. Risk factors and complications of puerperal sepsis at a tertiary healthcare centre. Pak J Med Sci. 2013;29(4):972-76.

Smail FM, Gyten GM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD007482.

Larson EL, Quiros D, Lin SX. Dissemination of CDC, S Hand Hygiene Guideline and impact on infection rates. Am J Infect Control. 2007;35(10):666-75.

Brown CE, Stettler RW, Twickler D, Cunningham FG. Puerperal septic pelvic thrombophlebitis: incidence and response to heparin therapy. Am J Obstet gynecol. 1999;181(1):143-8.

Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, Sands KE, Livingston J, Shtatland ES, et al. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerging Infectious Dis. 2001;7(5):837.

Owen J, Andrews WW. Wound complications after cesarean sections. Clinical Obstet Gynecol. 1994;37(4):842-55.

Andrews WW, Hauth JC, Cliver SP, Savage K, Goldenberg RL. Randomized clinical trial of extended spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis with coverage for Ureaplasma urealyticum to reduce post-cesarean delivery endometritis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(6):1183-9.

Mc Neeley Jr SG, Hendrix SL, Bennett SM, Singh A, Ransom SB, Kmak DC, Morley GW. Synthetic graft placement in the treatment of fascial dehiscence with necrosis and infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(6):14.