DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190896

No scalpel vasectomy: a cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitude and practice of gynaecologists

Girish P. Godbole, Gauri A. Oka

Abstract


Background: In spite of no scalpel vasectomy (NSV) being cheaper and safer, female sterilisations account for the majority of sterilisations performed worldwide. Research has focussed more on the “demand” and less on the “provider” side. Gynaecologists can be front-runners for the cause of population control in India. Hence, authors decided to estimate the knowledge of gynaecologists, their attitude and prevalent practice of NSV.

Methods: Cross-sectional study. Interviewer-administered questionnaire used for face-to-face data collection from gynecologists registered with the Pune Obstetric and Gynecological Society.

Results: Out of 447 gynecologists, 158 (35.3%) were males and 289 (64.7%) females. Mean age was 46.3 years ± 12.1 years, (range 24-80 years). Only 14 (3.1%) were trained in performing NSV. Only a minority knew about type of anaesthesia used (1.8%) and number of accesses needed (48.1%) for NSV. Only 40.7% and 18.1% knew about time to resume sexual activity and number of ejaculations to be covered by additional contraceptives after NSV respectively. More than half [258 (57.7%)] were willing to undergo training in NSV. Among those unwilling for training, female and older gynecologists (≥40 years) significantly outnumbered male and younger gynecologists (76.5% Vs. 23.5%; p=0.000 and 78.8% Vs. 21.2% respectively; p=0.000). Majority (79.9%) referred a couple willing for NSV to surgeons or urologists or advised female sterilization (17%).

Conclusions: Knowledge of gynecologists about NSV was inadequate. Minority were trained in performing NSV. Male and younger gynecologists were willing to undergo training in NSV. Most preferred practices were referring couples elsewhere or advising female sterilization.


Keywords


Attitude, Gynecologists, Knowledge, No scalpel vasectomy, Practice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bhuyan K, Ali I, Barua SJ. Role of No Scalpel Vasectomy in Male Sterilization. 2012;74(4):284-7.

Bhuyan K, Ali I, Sarma G, Das U. No Scalpel Vasectomy (NSV) with Ligation and Excision: A Single Centre Experience. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2015;77(3):1038-40.

Li L, Shao J, Wang X. Percutaneous no-scalpel vasectomy via one puncture in China. Urol J. 2014;11(2):1452-6.

Scott B, Alam D, Hopkins J, Raman S. The RESPOND Project Study Series: Contributions to Global Knowledge Factors Affecting Acceptance of Vasectomy in Uttar Pradesh: Insights from Community-Based, Participatory Qualitative Research Options PEER Unit Consultant, Options UK. 2011

Shih G, Dubé K, Dehlendorf C. “We never thought of a vasectomy”: a qualitative study of men and women's counseling around sterilization. Contracep. 2013;88(3):376-81.

Sood A, Pahwa P. Vasectomy : a study of attitudes , beliefs , knowledge and practices among literate men in Punjab, India. 2014;3(2):418-23.

Shih G, Zhang Y. Bringing Men to the Table : Sterilization Can Be for Him or for Her. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(4):731-40.

Rajoura O, Meena G, Kaza R, Bhasin S. Acceptability of No-scalpel Vasectomy at a male family welfare centre in Delhi. J Fam Welf. 2003;49(2):10-3.

International Institute for Population sciences. National Family Health Survey - 4, 2015-16. District Fact Sheet Pune. 2015; Available at : http://rchiips.org/NFHS/FCTS/MH/MH_FactSheet_521_Pune.pdf

International Institute for Population Sciences. National Family Health Survey - 4, 2015-2016--India Fact Sheet. Available at: http://www.rchiips.org/nfhshttp://www.iipsindia.org

Mahapatra S, Narula C, Kalita TJ, Thakur CP, Mehra R. Assessment of knowledge and perception regarding male sterilization (Non-Scalpel Vasectomy) among community health workers in Jharkhand , India. Indian J Community Heal. 2014;26(4):428-33.

Ebeigbe PN, Igberase GO, Eigbefoh J. Vasectomy: a survey of attitudes, counseling patterns and acceptance among Nigerian resident gynecologists. Ghana Med J. 2011;45(3):101-4.

Char A, Saavala M, Kulmala T. Provider bias or organizational limitations? Female and male health care workers’ interaction with men in the reproductive health programmes in rural central India. J Fam Welf. 2011;57(2):1-11.

Dersimonian R, Clemens J, Spirtas R, Perlman J. Vasectomy and prostate cancer risk: Methodological review of the evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(2):163-72.

Holt SK, Salinas CA, Stanford JL. Vasectomy and the risk of prostate cancer. J Urol. 2008;180(6):2565-78.

Moller H, Knudsen LB, Lynge E. Risk of testicular cancer after vasectomy: cohort study of over 73,000. BMJ. 1994;309:295-9.

Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Seagroatt V, Yeates D. Cancer and cardiovascular disease after vasectomy: an epidemiological database study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84(5):1438-43.