DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190032

A clinical study on the analysis of caesarean section rates using Robson’s ten group classification in a tertiary care hospital

Priya Shankar, Madhu J., Vinay Raju

Abstract


Background: Auditing c section rates can be done using Robson’s classification which in turn helps achieve a uniform basis for comparison across centers and across various countries.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was done in a tertiary care hospital in north Karnataka KIMS, over a period of 6 months May 2017 to October 2017. All cases of LSCS done during this period were classified according to Robson’s classification and analyzed.

Results: Out of 5080 overall deliveries 1876 delivered by cesarean section attributing to 36.76% cesarean section rate. Highest contribution was from group 5 (36%) and group 2 (19.24%).

Conclusions: Robson’s classification helps to identify and analyze the group that contribute to the most to overall cesarean section rate and this helps us to modify strategies and interventions to optimize cesarean section rate.


Keywords


Caesarean section rate, Primary caesarean section, Robson’s classification

Full Text:

PDF

References


Maternal perinatal Robson classification implementation. Available at: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/maternal_perinatal/robson-clossification-implementatin/en/.

WHO. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436-7.

Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: Multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007;335(7268):1025.

Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1819-29.

Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Guelmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PloS One. 2014;9(6):e97769.

Figo WG, Care OM. Best practice advice on the 10-Group Classification System for cesarean deliveries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet: the official organ of the Int Fed Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135(2):232-3.

Wanjari SA. Rising caesarean section rate: a matter of concern?. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2014;3:728-31.

Shirsath A, Risbud N. Analysis of cesarean section rate according to Robson’s 10-group classification system at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Sci Res. 2014;3(1):401-2.

Kansara V, Patel S, Aanand N, Muchhadia J, Kagathra B, Patel R. A recent way of evaluation of cesarean birth rate by Robson’s 10-group system. J Med Pharma Allied Sci. 2014;01:62-70.

Koteshwara S, Sujatha MS. Analysis of caesarean section rates using Robsons ten group classification: the first step. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:3481-5.