DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20185445

Comparative study of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy

Tejal L. Patel, Rinkal R. Patel, Vaibhavi Vaghela

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most common operation performed in Obstetrics and Gynecology next to caesarean section. Due to its advantages vaginal hysterectomy are more and more performed now. Only drawback is lack of expertise. Present study focuses on comparison between outcomes in abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy and to determine which route of hysterectomy is superior, safer and effective.

Methods: The study is a prospective study conducted in the department of obstetrics and Gynecology. Civil hospital, Ahmedabad between the period of Jan 2016 to 2017. Of 100 patients. Fifty patients who underwent hysterectomy by vaginal route are taken as study group A, and the remaining 50 patients who underwent by the abdominal route are taken as study group B.

Results: Majority of women undergoing hysterectomy were in age group of 30-50 years; postmenopausal age group women were less;13 NDVH and 5 in AH. Majority of the women were multipara in both age groups. Menorrhagia was found to be major indication with 42 in NDVH and 40 in AH. There is much significant difference in the postoperative pain in both groups with less in NDVH group. There is not much significant difference in blood loss in both the groups. Postoperative complications were more with AH.

Conclusions: Thus, it can be concluded that NDVH is feasible, safe and provide more patient comfort without increasing the duration of surgery and other post-operative complications.


Keywords


Abdominal hysterectomy, Hysterectomy, Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy

Full Text:

PDF

References


American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task Force on Quality Assurance. Quality assurance in obstetrics and gynecology. Amer College of Obstetricians &; 1989.

American college of obstetricians and gynaecologist, precis. IV, and update in obstetrics DC,The college,1990

Hoffman MS, Jaeger N. A new method for gaining entry into the scarred anteriorcul-de-sac during transvaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obset Gynecol. 1990;162(5):1269-70.

Rupali D, Shivani A, Bharti MM, Soumendra KS. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy An experience. J Obstet Gynaencol. 2004;54:376-8.

Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH. Guidelines to determine the route of oophorectomy with hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(6):1483-8.

Garg PK, Deka D, Malhotra N. Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy for benign condition. A better proposition than abdominal hysterectomy. Obs and Gynae Today. 2002;6:345-6.

Kovac SR. Decision directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2000;71(2):159-69.

Taylor SM, Romero AA, Kammerer-Doak DN, Qualls C, Rogers RG. Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatous uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1579-82.

Sawkar AK. Vaginal hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectonomy in non-descent uterus-a comparative study (Doctoral dissertation, RGUHS).

Lio, Sui Ling, Li Xiao, Mao. Clinical analysis of transvaginal hysterectomy in 50 cases with uterine myoma, Department of OBGY. Third affiliated Hospital, Sun Vat Sen University China.