Third stage of labour: expectant versus active management-a comparative study in local low risk population

Authors

  • Kavita A. Chandnani Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, SBKSMIRC, Dhiraj general hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Deepti D. Sharma Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, GMERS Medical College, Gotri, Vadodara, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190298

Keywords:

Active management of the third stage of labour (AMTSL), Expectant management, Postpartum hemorrhage, Third stage of labour

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality, accounting for about 35% of all maternal deaths. These deaths have a major impact on the lives and health of the families affected. Thus, anticipation as well as proper management of 3rd stage of labour is mandatory. The objective of this study was to compare expectant and active management of third stage of labour in preventing post-partum blood loss and having impact on prevention of maternal mortality in local population. Advantages and disadvantages of both techniques might be over estimated.

Methods: Prospective comparative study carried out in Obstetrics and Gynecology department of SBKSMIRC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Dhiraj general hospital, comprising of 200 laboring women admitted directly or from OPD to labour room for expected vaginal delivery. They were randomly allocated to group A (expectant management) and group B (active management). Labour progress was charted on partograph and interventions recorded. Statistical analysis of data was done after compiling and tabulation of data. Mean±SD for descriptive variables were calculated and appropriate statistical tests applied to determine significance.

Results: Average PPBL (post-partum blood loss) was 360.5ml in group A as compared to 290.6ml in group B. 12 patients in group A had blood loss more than 500ml while none in group B. 66% cases in group B had duration of third stage of labour less than 5 min as compared to only 22% in group A. the mean duration of third stage was 13.46±8.3 in group A while 5.32±3.05 in group B. these differences were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Active management of the third stage of labour is associated with less blood loss as well as a shorter duration of third stage compared with expectant management. It is reasonable to advocate this regime.

References

Alkema L, Chou D, Hogan D, Zhang S, Moller AB, Gemmill A, et al. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. Lancet. 2016;387(10017):462-74.

Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066-74.

Haeri S, Dildy III GA. Maternal mortality from hemorrhage. Seminars Perinatol. 2012;36(1):48-55.

Miller S, Lester F, Hensleigh P. Central European University. Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage: New Advances for Low-Resource Settings. J Midwifery Women’s Health. 2004;49(4):283-92.

WHO/MCH. Prevention and Management of Post-Partum Hemorrhage. Report of technical working group, July 1989. WHO/MCH/90.7, Geneva 1990.

El-Refaey H, Rodeck C. Post-partum haemorrhage: definitions, medical and surgical management. A time for change. Brit Medical Bulletin. 2003;67(1):205-17.

WHO Recommendations for the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage. 2012 sec1:4; page 2.

Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald SJ. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of systematic reviews. 2000(3).

WHO DoMPS. WHO Recommendations for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.

Harris T. An explanation for the third stage practice variation: the theory of contingent decision-making. In Normal labour and birth: 3rd Research Conference 7-9 June 2006 at Grangeover-Sands, Cumbria, England. 2006.

Winter C, Macfarlane A, Deneux‐Tharaux C, Zhang WH, Alexander S, Brocklehurst P, et al. Variations in policies for management of the third stage of labour and the immediate management of postpartum haemorrhage in Europe. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;114(7):845-54.

Lalonde A, Daviss BA, Acosta A, Herschderfer K. Postpartum hemorrhage today: ICM/FIGO initiative 2004-2006. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;94(3):243-53.

Joint Statement. Joint statement: management of the third stage of labour to prevent post-partum haemorrhage. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004;49:76-7.

WHO. Recommendations for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage department of making pregnancy safer. Geneva: WHO, 2006.

Festin MR, Lumbiganon P, Tolosa JE, Finney KA, Ba-Thike K, Chipato T, et al. International survey on variations in practice of the management of the third stage of labour. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:286-91.

Kodkany BS, Derman RJ. A textbook of postpartum haemorrhage: a comprehensive guide to evaluation, management and surgical intervention; special FOGSI ed. Jaypee brothers. 2006;1(4):35-41.

Patel A, Goudar SS, Geller SE, Kodkany BS, Edlavitch SA, Wagh K, et al. Drape estimation versus visual assessment for estimating postpartum haemorrhage. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;93:220-4.

Jangsten E, Mattsson LÅ, Lyckestam I, Hellström AL, Berg M. A comparison of active management and expectant management of the third stage of labour: a Swedish randomised controlled trial. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118(3):362-9.

Maryam K, Mohsen F, Zahra M, Narges SA. Comparison of active and expectant management on the duration of the third stage of labour and the amount of blood loss during the third and fourth stages of labour: a randomised controlled trial. Midwifery. 2010;26(2):241-5.

Dogukan Y, Sefik EO, Ali E, Elif CE, Derya UH, Olgu B, Kerem DS, et al. Comparison of active vs. expectant management of the third stage of labor in women with low risk of postpartum hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial. Polish Gynecol. 2016;87(5):399-404.

Niven RB. Effect of Active versus Expectant Nursing Management of Third Stage of Labour on Post-Partum Hemorrhage. IOSR-JNHS. 2017;6(1):89-94.

Karim R, Pervaiz F, Muhammad MF. Comparison of active versus expectant management of third stage of labour. J Postgrad Med Inst. 2015;29(1):14-7.

Nothnagle M, Taylor S J. Should Active Management of the Third Stage of Labour Be Routine? Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(10):2119-20.

Hutton EK, Hassan ES. Late vs. early clamping of the umbilical cord in full-term neonates: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. JAMA. 2007;297:1241-52.

McDonald SJ, Middleton P. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;2(2):CD004074.

Sheldon RW, Durocher J, Winikoff B, Blun J, Trissell J. How effective are the components of active management of the third stage of labour?. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2013;13:46.

Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Landoulsi S, Widmer M, Abdel-Aleem H, Festin M, et al. Active management of the third stage of labour with and without controlled cord traction: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9827):1721-7.

Begley CM, Gyte GML, Devane D, McGuire W, Weeks A. Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD007412.

PATH. Postpartum hemorrhage prevention and treatment website. 2011. Available at: http://www.pphprevention.org/pph.php.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles