DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184706

Comparison of saline instillation sonography with trans vaginal sonography in abnormal uterine bleeding: a prospective study

Banishree Pati, Rupa Vani K., Gowri A. L., Debendra Kumar Tripathy

Abstract


Background: Abnormal vaginal bleeding may be caused by an extensive spectrum of disorders, both gynecologic and non-gynecologic. Diagnostic accuracy of abnormal uterine bleeding is important for the management.  Trans vaginal sonography (TVS) is one of the commonest investigation used for the diagnosis, but the diagnosis is not always accurate for all clinical conditions. Saline instillation sonography (SIS) has been shown to improve the diagnosis. Authors aimed to compare the TVS and SIS diagnosis with the final histopathological diagnosis.

Methods: Seventy-five patients with the complained of abnormal uterine bleeding attending outpatient department of a tertiary care institute were enrolled for the study. Trans vaginal sonography (TVS) and saline instillation sonography (SIS) was done on outpatient basis. The diagnosis was compared with final histopathological diagnosis, in term of diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

Results: Seventy-five patients who were enrolled for the study. Sixty-four patients underwent surgery and final histopathological diagnosis was established. Four patients SIS was not possible, data was analysed for sixty patients.

Conclusions: In SIS abnormal uterus diagnosis confidence was significantly improved (p value 0.001) when compared to TVS. The diagnosis of submucous myoma significantly improved (p=0.015) by SIS when compared to TVS. There was no significant difference between TVS and SIS diagnosis of Myoma remote from the endometrium (p=0.522), Adenomyosis (p=1), Focal endometrial abnormality (p=0.654) and Diffuse endometrial abnormality (p=1). The SIS sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were either improved or same, when compare to TVS for all the diagnosis except for the diagnosis of focal endometrial abnormality.


Keywords


Abnormal uterine bleeding, Saline instillation sonography, Trans vaginal sonography

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bronz L, Suter T, Rusca T. The value of transvaginal sonography with and without saline instillation in the diagnosis of uterine pathology in pre- and postmenopausal women with abnormal bleeding or suspect sonographic findings. Ultrasound Obstet and Gynecol. 1997;9(1):53-8.

Munro MG, Critchley HO, Fraser IS, FIGO Menstrual Disorders Working Group. The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(7):2204-8.

Gimpelson RJ, Rappold HO. A comparative study between panoramic hysteroscopy with directed biopsies and dilatation and curettage. A review of 276 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(3 Pt 1):489-92.

Dijkhuizen FPHLJ, Vries LDD, Mol BWJ, Brölmann HAM, Peters HM, Moret E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15(5):372-6.

O'Connell LP, Fries MH, Zeringue E, Brehm W. Triage of abnormal postmenopausal bleeding: a comparison of endometrial biopsy and transvaginal sonohysterography versus fractional curettage with hysteroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(5):956-61.

Bree RL, Bowerman RA, Bohm-Velez M, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, DeDreu S, et al. US evaluation of the uterus in patients with postmenopausal bleeding: a positive effect on diagnostic decision making. Radiol. 2000;216(1):260-4.

Jain M, Chakraborty S. Evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding with transvaginal sonography. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:2794-9.

Tangri MK, Srivastava AK. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography as compared to hysteroscopy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:682-7.

Berridge DL, Winter TC. Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(1):97-112.

Jorizzo JR, Riccio GJ, Chen MYM, Carr JJ. Sonohysterography: the next step in the evaluation of the abnormal endometrium. Radiographics. 1999;19(suppl 1):S117-30.

Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21(2):87-95.

Richman TS, Viscomi GN, deCherney A, Polan ML, Alcebo LO. Fallopian tubal patency assessed by ultrasound following fluid injection. Work in progress. Radiol. 1984;152(2):507-10.

Randolph JF, Ying YK, Maier DB, Schmidt CL, Riddick DH, Randolph JR. Comparison of real-time ultrasonography, hysterosalpingography, and laparoscopy/hysteroscopy in the evaluation of uterine abnormalities and tubal patency. Fertil. Steril. 1986;46(5):828-32.

Varadarajan R, Sreekantha SM. Role of hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding in perimenopausal age group. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(10):1504-9.

Wolman I, Groutz A, Gordon D, Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB, Jaffa AJ. Timing of sonohysterography in menstruating women. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;48(4):254-8.

Williams PL, Laifer-Narin SL, Ragavendra N. US of abnormal uterine bleeding. Radiographics. 2003;23(3):703-18.

Davis PC, O’Neill MJ, Yoder IC, Lee SI, Mueller PR. Sonohysterographic findings of endometrial and subendometrial conditions. Radiographics. 2002;22(4):803-16.

Becker E, Lev-Toaff AS, Kaufman EP, Halpern EJ, Edelweiss MI, Kurtz AB. The added value of transvaginal sonohysterography over transvaginal sonography alone in women with known or suspected leiomyoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(3):237-47.

Schwärzler P, Concin H, Bösch H, Berlinger A, Wohlgenannt K, Collins W, et al. An evaluation of sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the assessment of intrauterine pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;11(5):337-42.

Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, Valentin L. Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrium > 5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(2):157-62.

Goldstein SR, Zeltser I, Horan CK, Snyder JR, Schwartz LB. Ultrasonography-based triage for perimenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):102-8.

Farquhar C, Ekeroma A, Furness S, Arroll B. A systematic review of transvaginal ultrasonography, sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding in premenopausal women. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2003;82(6):493-504.

Verma SK, Lev-Toaff AS, Baltarowich OH, Bergin D, Verma M, Mitchell DG. Adenomyosis: sonohysterography with MRI correlation. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(4):1112-6.

Soares SR, Barbosa dos Reis MM, Camargos AF. Diagnostic accuracy of sonohysterography, transvaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography in patients with uterine cavity diseases. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):406-11.

Dueholm M, Forman A, Jensen ML, Laursen H, Kracht P. Transvaginal sonography combined with saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluating the uterine cavity in premenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18(1):54-61.

Cicinelli E, Romano F, Anastasio PS, Blasi N, Parisi C. Sonohysterography versus hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endouterine polyps. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1994;38(4):266-71.

Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Olesen F. Imaging techniques for evaluation of the uterine cavity and endometrium in premenopausal patients before minimally invasive surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(6):388-403.

Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, Subak L, Scheidler J, Segal M, et al. Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA. 1998;280(17):1510-7.

Bonnamy L, Marret H, Perrotin F, Body G, Berger C, Lansac J. Sonohysterography: a prospective survey of results and complications in 81 patients. Europ J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;102:42-7.