PAP smear in pregnancy: a hospital-based study

Authors

  • S. Senthil Priya Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VMKVMCH, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
  • R. Shankar Department of Preventive Medicine, VMKVMCH, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20184941

Keywords:

Antenatal women, Cervical cancer, Pap smear

Abstract

Background: Pregnant and non-pregnant women are at similar risk for CIN and cervical cancer. The incidence of abnormal cervical cytologic findings during pregnancy is 0.72 to 1.67%. Approximately 86% of all squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) indentified during pregnancy are classified as low-grade SIL, whereas 14% are high- grade SIL. The aim of this study is to assess the incidence of Pap smear abnormalities among antenatal woman presenting to present hospital.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted in present medical college hospital in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology for a period of one year from Jan 2017 to Dec 2017. A total of 200 antenatal women were included in the study. Ayre’s spatula was used to conduct smear tests in this study. All smears were immediately sprayed with a fixative and sent to the department of Pathology. The cytological results were reported based on the Bethesda classification system 2001.

Results: The pap smear report revealed that 26% of the subjects had inflammatory changes and for 66% it showed negative for intraepithelial lesion and for only 1% of the subjects had signs related to carcinoma cervix in which one patient had Atypical Squamous Cell of Undetermined Significance (ASCUS) and another patient had Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) and no satisfactory sample was able to be obtained in 6% of the subjects.  In present study authors found a statistically significant association between the age at marriage and the pap smear report, lower the age at marriage (<20 years) higher the incidence of inflammatory changes in the cervix and both the patients who were reported with ASCUS and LSIL were in the age of 15 and 16 years respectively.

Conclusions: Clinicians should make every effort to educate, counsel and screen pregnant women if they have not had a Pap test in the past.

References

Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P. GLOBOCAN 2002. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence Worldwide. IARC Cancer Base No. 5. Version 2.0, IARC Press, Lyon.

Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55(2):74-108.

Fader AN, Alward EK, Niederhauser A. Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: a multinational evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:113.e1-6.

Katyal S, Mehrotra R. Complementary procedures in cervical cancer screening in low resource settings. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2011;61(4):436-8.

Cronje HS, van Rensburg E, Niemand I, Cooreman BF, Bever E, Divall P. Screening for cervical neoplasia during pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;6:19-23.

Brown D, Berran P, Kaplan KJ. Special situations: abnormal cervical cytology during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:178-85.

Economos KA, Perez NV, Delke IS, Collado ML, Tancer ML. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81(6):915-8.

Nygard JF, Nygard M, Skare GB, Thoresen SO. Pap smear screening in women under 30 in the Norwegian coordinated cervical cancer screening program, with a comparison of immediate biopsy vs Pap smear triage of moderate dysplasia. Acta Cytol. 2006;50(3):295-302.

Hunter MI, Monk BJ, Tewari KS. Cervical neoplasia in pregnancy. Part 1: screening and management of preinvasive disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):3-9.

Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, Killackey M, Kulasingam SL, Cain J, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:147-72.

Yamazaki T, Inaba F, Takeda N, Huruno M, Kamemori T, Kousaka N, et al. A study of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnant women. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006;273:274-7.

Sueblinvong T, Suwannarurk K, Chanthasenanont A, Treetampinich C, Pongrojpaw D. Prevalence and management of abnormal pap smear in antenatal care clinic at Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:133-7.

Ngaojaruwong N, Vuthiwong C, Punpuckdeekoon P, Thongsorn N. Prevalence of abnormal papanicolaou smear in pregnant women at Phramongkutklao Hospital. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;16:179-85.

McDonald SD, Faught W, Gruslin A. Cervical cancer during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24:491-8.

Economos K, Perez Veridiano N, Delke I. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17 – year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:915-8.

Arbyn M, Autier P, Ferlay J. Burden of cervical cancer in the 27 member states of the European Union: estimates for 2004. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(8):1423-5.

Manikkam B. Screening for cervical cancer during pregnancy. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2016;3:2493-8.

Vural E, Gonenc L, Aka N. Antenatal kontrollerde pap smear taraması ve Sonucları. Türkiye Aile Hekimligi Dergisi. 2004;8:111-5.

Yatlı S, Altıntepe G, Dayıcıoglu V. Gebelerde servikal kanser taraması. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2003;34:7-11.

Ayten Dinc. Pap Smear Screening Results for Turkish Pregnant Women. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2012;, Vol 13(11)5835-38.

Khaengkhor P, Mairaing K, Suwannarurk K, Thaweekul Y, Poomtavorn Y, Pattaraarchachai J, et al. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94:152-8.

Atilgan R, Celik A, Boztosun A, Ilter E, Yalta T, Ozercan R, et al. Evaluation of cervical cytological abnormalities in Turkish population. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2012;55:52-5.

Kulkarni PR, Rani H, Vimalambike MG, Ravishankar S. Opportunistic screening for cervical cancer in a tertiary hospital in Karnataka, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14:5101-5.

Bhutia K, Puri M, Gami N, Aggarwal K, Trivedi SS. Persistent inflammation on pap smear: Does it warrant evaluation?. Indian J Cancer. 2011;48:220-2.

Barouti E, Farzaneh F, Sene A. The pathogenic microorganism in papanicolaou vaginal smears and correlation with inflammation. J Family Reprod Health. 2013;7:23-7.

Vaghela BK, Vaghela VK, Santwani PM. Analysis of abnormal cervical cytology in papanicolaou smears at tertiary care center-A retrospective study. IJBAR. 2014;5:47-9.

Himabindu P, Kanwal A, Vasudha MS. Pap smear in antenatal women - routine screening in low resource settings. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(4):4-5.

Apgar BS, Kittendorf AL, Bettcher CM, Wong J, Kaufman AJ. Update on ASCCP consensus guidelines for abnormal cervical screening tests and cervical histology. Am Fam Physician. 2009;80(2):147-55.

Ueki M, Ueda M, Kumagai K, Okamoto Y, Noda S, Matsuoka M. Cervical cytology and conservative management of cervical neoplasias during pregnancy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009;13(3):182-5.

Connor JP. Noninvasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998;25:331-42.

Nygård M, Daltveit AK, Thoresen SØ, Nygård JF. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7(1):10.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-26

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles