An audit of hysterectomies at a tertiary care teaching hospital

Authors

  • Parveen Rajora Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Faridkot, Punjab, India
  • Seema Grover Bhatti Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Faridkot, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20182898

Keywords:

Fibroid, Hysterectomy, Prolapse

Abstract

Background: Hysterectomy is the second most common major surgical procedure performed on women all over the world next to caesarean section. Emergence of effective medical and conservative treatment for benign conditions in the uterus is now posing a question mark regarding the justification of hysterectomy. It has been realized that uterus should not be considered as a vestigial organ after child bearing. Apart from few population based studies, there is no national level survey done in India which give us the prevalence and indications for hysterectomy in India.

Methods: Present study involved all patients who underwent Hysterectomy at Guru Gobind Singh Medical College Faridkot in a span of one year from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2017.

Results: In the year 2017, 250 hysterectomies were done, most common age group was 40-49 years (36.8%) and most common indication was fibroid uterus (40%) followed by ca ovary (19.6%), Abdominal route was most commonly preferred.

Conclusions: Hysterectomy was justified in 98% women in our series based on post operative histopathological report of the specimen. However we hypothesize that 20 cases of DUB, 5 cases of CIN and 10 cases of endometriosis and 3 cases of chronic cervicitis could have been managed conservatively. 10 cases of obstetric hysterectomies could have been avoided by disseminating awareness among peripheral centres for early referral and by attempting a rather conservative approach of uterine artery embolizations. As the incidence of carcinoma is increasing in the Malwa region of Punjab people prefer hysterectomies instead of conservative treatment. Hysterectomy is used commonly to improve the quality of life and sometime it is life saving procedure. However it should be justified before taking a direct decision of sacrificing uterus.

References

Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091-5.

Nausheen F, Iqbal J, Bhatti FA, Khan AT, Sheikh S. Hysterectomy: the patient’s perspective. Ann Gynecol. 2004;10:339-41.

Singh A, Arora AK. Why hysterectomy rate are lower in India? Indian J Comm Med. 2008;33(3):196-7.

Desai S, Sinha T, Mahal A. Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India. Reprod Health Mat. 2011;19(37):42-51.

Babalola E, Bharucha A, Schleck C, Gebhart J, Zinsmeister A, Melton J. Decreasing utilization of hysterectomy: a population-based study in Olmsted county, Minnesota, 1965-2002. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(3):214.

Radha K, Devi PG, Chandrasekharan PA, Swathi P, Radha G, Keerthana. Epidemiology of Hysterectomy - A Cross Sectional Study among Piligrims of Tirumala. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(7):1-5.

Lee N, Dicker R, Rubin G, Ory H. Confirmation of the preoperative diagnoses for hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150(3):283-7.

Medhi P, Dowerah S, Borgohain D. A Histopathological Audit of Hysterectomy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital. International Journal of Contemporary Medical Research. 2016;3(4):1226-8.

Pandey D, Sehgal K, Saxena A, Hebbar S, Nambiar J, Bhat RG. An Audit of Indications, Complications, and Justification of Hysterectomies at a Teaching Hospital in India. Int J Reprod Med. 2014;2:279273.

Mukhopadhya N, Manyonda I. The hysterectomy story in the United Kingdom. J Mid-Life Health. 2013;4(1):40-1.

Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95(2):199-205.

Leung PL, Tsang SW, Yuen PM. An audit on hysterectomy for benign diseases in public hospitals in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2007;13(3):187-93.

Butt JL, Jeffery ST, Van Der Spuy ZM. An audit of indications and complications associated with elective hysterectomy at a public service hospital in South Africa. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2012;116(2):112-6.

Toma A, Hopman WM, Gorwill RH. Hysterectomy at a Canadian tertiary care facility: results of a one year retrospective review. BMC Women’s Health. 2004;4:10.

Magon N, Divakar H, Kriplani A. Editorial: the use, misue, and abuse of hysterectomy. J Mid-Life Health. 2013;4(1).

Downloads

Published

2018-06-27

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles