DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163441
Published: 2016-12-15

Maternal and fetal outcome in epidural analgesia study

Jaya Choudhary, Himanshu Sharma, Veena Acharya

Abstract


Background: Labour is a highly complex event. Labour may be the most painful experience many women ever encounter. The objective of this study was to study the maternal and fetal outcome in epidural analgesia.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 60 pregnant women. The study group (n = 60) consist of group A (epidural analgesia, n = 60) and group B (control, n = 30).

Results: The maternal and fetal outcome in group A and group B were not statistically significant. Mean duration of first stage of labour (minute) was significantly lower in group A as compared to group B (p value <0.001). The duration of second stage of labour was prolonged in group A as compared to group B (p value 0.0137). The modes of delivery (normal, instrumental delivery, LSCS) were not statistically significant in both the groups. The neonatal outcome (Apgar score at 1 minute and 5 minutes) were statistically similar in both groups (P value = 0.569).

Conclusions: Epidural analgesia is safe and effective to relieve the labour pain. It has no adverse maternal and fetal outcome. Patients are very comfortable and happy after epidural analgesia.


Keywords


Labour, Analgesia, Patients

Full Text:

PDF

References


ACOG - Committee on Obstetric practice - Committee Opinion - Number 295; 2004.

Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia for Labour and delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1503-10.

Justins DM, Francis D, Houlton PG, Reynolds F. A controlled trial of extradural fentanyl in labour. Br J Anaesth. 1982;54(4):409-14.

Li-zhong W, Xiang-yang C, Xia L, Xiao-xia H, Bei-lei T. Comparison of bupivacaine, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine with sufentanil for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized clinical trial. Chin Med J. 2010;123(2):178-83.

Owen MD, D’ Angelo R, Gerancher JC. 0.125% ropivacaine is similar to 0.125% bupivacaine for labor analgesia using patient controlled epidural infusion. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:527-31.

Barsley H, Gristwood R, Baker H, Watson N. A comparison of cardiovascular effect of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J clin Pharmacol. 1998;46:245-9.

Dutta DC. Normal labour, Text book of Obstetrics; 2014.

Crawford JS. Obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia I current reviews in obstetrics and gynecology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1982.

Wylie and Churchill-Davidsons, A practice of Anaesthesia 5th Edition. London: Lloyd-Luke Publication; Chicago: Distributed by Year Book Medical Publishers; 1984.

Bonica JJ. Peripheral mechanisms and pathways of parturition pain. Brit J Anaesth. 1979;51:3S.

Cleland JGP. Paravertebral anaesthesia in obstetrics. Experimental and clinical basis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1933;57:51.

Obstetric anaesthesia, Wylie and Churchill-Davidsons, a practice of anaesthesia, 7th Edition; 2004.

Crawford JS. Lumbar Epidural block in Labour, a clinical analysis. Br J Anesth. 1979;44:66-74.

Bromage PR. Epidural Analgesia Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1978.

Melzack AR. The myth of painless child birth. Pain. 1984;19:321-7.