DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163423
Published: 2016-12-15

Comparison of dermabond adhesive glue with skin suture for repair of episiotomy

Sumit Chamariya, Madhva Prasad, Anahita Chauhan

Abstract


Background: The objective of the study was to compare perineal skin closure of episiotomy with cyanoacrylate adhesive glue with standard skin closure.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. 100 primigravidae undergoing normal vaginal delivery were assigned to study and control groups. After completion of vagina mucosa and muscle suturing; in study group, skin closure was done with adhesive glue and in control group, conventional suturing done. Time taken to complete skin closure, pain perceived during and after procedure and postoperative wound healing and cosmesis of perineal area were studied.

Results: The mean time for skin closure with adhesive glue (1.16 minutes) was lesser than conventional skin suturing (3.52 minutes). 84% of study group patients perceived no pain (VAS score of 1) while 72% of patients in control group perceived mild pain during suturing. In all time intervals (during and after the procedure), pain intensity was lower in the study group (p value <0.05). The time for healing was around 4 days in the study group and around 8 days in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of wound complications and cosmesis between the groups.

Conclusions: Findings of the study support the safe and efficacious usage of cyanoacrylate adhesive glue for episiotomy skin closure. Cyanoacrylate adhesive glue is a superior alternative to conventional skin suturing shorter time, less pain during and after the procedure. Wound healing and cosmesis are comparable with both adhesive glue and suturing.


Keywords


Episiotomy skin closure, Cyanoacrylate adhesive glue

Full Text:

PDF

References


Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2009;1:CD000081.

Seijmonsbergen SAE, Sahami S, Lucas C, Jonge A de. Nonsuturing or skin adhesives versus suturing of the perineal skin after childbirth: a systematic review. Birth. 2015;42(2):100-15.

Zhou F, Wang XD, Li J, Huang GQ, Gao BX. Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD010441.

Singer AJ, Thode HC. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am J Surg. 2004;187(2):238-48.

Pronio A, Di Filippo A, Narilli P, Caporillli D, Vestri A, Ciamberlano B, et al. Closure of cutaneous incision after thyroid surgery: a comparison between metal clips and cutaneous octyl-2-cyanoacrylate adhesive. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Eur J Plast Surg. 2010;34(2):103-10.

Kim J, Singh MH, Cool AJ, Hanlon AM, Leffell DJ. Fast absorbing gut suture versus cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive in the epidermal closure of linear repairs following mohs micrographic surgery. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015;8(2):24-9.

Adoni A, Anteby E. The use of Histoacryl for episiotomy repair. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98(5):476-8.

Mota R, Costa F, Amaral A, Oliveira F, Santos CC, Campos D. Skin adhesive versus subcuticular suture for perineal skin repair after episiotomy-a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(6):660-6.

Switzer EF, Dinsmore RC, North JH Jr. Subcuticular closure versus Dermabond: a prospective randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2003;69(5):434-6.

Bowen ML, Selinger M. Episiotomy closure comparing enbucrilate tissue adhesive with conventional sutures. Int J Gyn Obst. 2002;78(3):201-5.