DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163158
Published: 2016-12-15

Clinical and ultrasonological features of adenomyosis and its histopathological correlation

Sunita Gupta, Gunjan Goel, Surabhi Agrawal, Parul Garg, Esha Khanuja

Abstract


Background: Adenomyosis is a common gynaecological condition that affects the menstruating women. Uterine enlargement, dysmenorrhoea and HMB are regarded as the cardinal clinical symptoms of adenomyosis. Classically it was thought, compared with ultrasonography, when adenomyosis is suspected, MRI enables more accurate diagnosis of the disease.

Methods: 78 subjects were enrolled after an informed consent that had complaints of HMB, Dysparenuia, dysmenorrhea, and chronic pelvic pain. Detailed history of the enrolled subjects was taken, followed by a clinical examination. These patients were then subjected to TVS where myometrial echo texture, presence of myometrial cysts, blurring of endomyometrial junction was noted. After hysterectomy, histopathological diagnosis was obtained.

Results: 78 subjects enrolled in the study. The mean age was 44.2 years. 43.5% had parity of 4 or more. HMB was present in 97.8% and dysmenorrhea in 93.48 % of HPE positive patient. Transvaginal sonography had a sensitivity of 89.13%, specificity of 90.62%, positive likelihood ratio of 9.51, negative likelihood ratio of 0.12, positive predictive value of 93.18%, negative predictive value of 85.29% and a diagnostic accuracy of 89.74%.

Conclusions: Thus adenomyosis has a prevalence of 30.23%. HMB with dysmenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain helps in diagnosis. TVS is both sensitive and specific in diagnosing adenomyosis without need for additional diagnostic tool. Endomyometrial junction blurring is the sensitive and specific criteria on TVS.


Keywords


Adenomyosis, TVS, HMB

Full Text:

PDF

References


Tamai K, Koyama T, Umeoka S, Saga T, Fujii S, Togashi K. Spectrum of MR features in adenomyosis. Best Practice and Research. Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2006:20(4):583-602.

Bird C, McElin T, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 1972;112(5):583-93.

Mehasseb MK, Habiba MA. review adenomyosis uteri: an update. The Obstetr Gynaecol. 2009;11:41-7.

Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, Jacobsen M, Hertz JB. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Human Reprod. 2001;16(11):2418-21.

Kunz G, Beil D, Deininger H, Wildt L, Leyendecker G. The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract: evidence from vaginal sonogram of uterine peristalsis and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy. Human Reprod. 1996;11(3):627-32.

Parazzini F, Mais V, Cipriani S, Busacca M, Venturini P; GISE. Determinants of adenomyosis in women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological conditions: results from a prospective multicentric study in Italy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;143(2):103-6.

Taran FA, Weaver AL, Coddington CC, Stewart EA. Understanding adenomyosis: a case control study. Fertility and Sterility. 2010;94:1223-8.

Kepkep K, Tuncay G, Göynümer, Tutal E. Transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings are most accurate? Ultrasound in Obstetr Gynecolol. 2007;30:341-5.

Meredith SM, Ramos LS, Kaunitz AM. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2009;201-107.e1-6.

Devlieger R, D’Hooge T, Timmerman D. Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Human Reprod Update. 2003;9(2):139-47.

Benagiano G, Brosens I. History of Adenomyosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):449-63.

Leyendecker G, Wildt L, Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: tissue injury and repair. Arch Gynecol Obstetr. 2009;280:529-38.

Bergholt T, Eriksen L, Berendt N, Jacobsen M, Hertz JB. Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy. Human Reprod. 2001;16(11):2418-21.

Bazot M, Daraï E, Rouger J, Detcher R, Cortez A, Uzan S. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound in Obstetr Gynecol. 2002;20:605-11.

Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio A, Chapman W. Patrice M. Adenomyosis: US features with histolohic correlation in an in vitro study. Radiol. 2000;215:783-90.

Moghadam R, Lathi RB, Shahmohamady B, Saberi NS, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, et al. Predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between leiomyoma and adenomyosis. JSLS. 2006;10(2):216-9.

Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Romanini ME, Zupi E, et al. Adenomyosis: three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(4):471-9.

Stamatopoulos CP, Mikos T, Grimbizis GF, Dimitriadis AS, Efstratiou I, Stamatopoulos P, et al. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of adenomyosis and myomas of the uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19(5):620-6.

Shrestha A. Risk factors for adenomyosis. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10(22):229-33.

Levgur M, Abadi M, Tucker A. Adenomyosis: symptoms, histology, and pregnancy terminations. Obstetr Gynecol. 2000;95(5):688-91.

Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2427-33.

Shaikh H, Khan KS. Adenomyosis in Pakistani women: four year experience at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(10):817-9.

Vavilis D, Agorastos T, Tzafetas J. Adenomyosis at Hysterectomy: prevalence and relationship to operative findings and reproductive and menstrual factors. Clin Experiment Obstetr Gynecol. 1996;53:36-8.

Benson R, Sneeden V. Adenomyosis: a reappraisal of symptomatology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;76:6132-6.

Harris WJ, Daniell JF, Baxter JW. Prior cesarean section. A risk factor for adenomyosis? J Reprod Med. 1985;30(3):173-5.

Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(4):312-22.

Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Daguati R, Abbiati A, Fedele L. Adenomyosis: epidemiological factors. Best Practi Res Clin Obstetr Gynaecol. 2006;20(4):465-77.

Matalliotakis IM, Kourtis AI, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis. Obstetr Gynecolol Clin North America. 2003;30:63-82.

Levy G, Dehaene A, Laurent N, Lernout M, Collinet P, Lucot JP, et al. An update on adenomyosis. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(1):3-25.

Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Arcaini L, Zanotti F, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility. 1992;58:94-7.

Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RC, et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994;190:803-6.

Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis A, Bret P. Diffuse Uterine Adenomyosis: Morphologic Criteria. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endovaginal Sonography. Radiology. 1995;197(3):609-14.

Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: Identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102(6):471-4.

Dueholm M, Lundorf E. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19(6):505-12.