DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175004

Comparative study of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device in vaginal and intra caesarean insertion

Babita Kanwat, Lakshmi Salodia, Madhubala Chauhan, Radha Rastogi

Abstract


Background: Institutional deliveries have increased all over the country, thereby providing opportunities for quality postpartum family planning services. In this period, women are highly receptive to accept family planning methods. Objective of this study was to evaluate CuT Multiload 375, in terms of acceptance, safety, efficacy, continuation rate, removal rate and to find out PPIUCD complications e.g. bleeding irregularities, perforation, expulsion and discontinuation due to various reasons.

Methods: Prospective analytical study was conducted from February 2016 to June 2016 in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, at RNT Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.100 patients in each vaginal and cesarean group were selected randomly. Multiload 375 was inserted after obtaining written consent.

Results: Missing threads were detected more in cesarean group (22.8%) than vaginal group (12.9%). Cumulative expulsion rate was 15.2% in vaginal group and 10.8% in cesarean group. Heavy Bleeding PV with or without the pain was the main reason for removal of CuT in both the groups. Removal rate for vaginal and cesarean group was 15.2% and 10.8% respectively.

Conclusions: PPIUCD is very effective, safe and reversible contraceptive method which provides contraceptive effect soon after birth. Although there is relatively high incidence of expulsions and removal in the both group still the continuation rate was 69.4% in vaginal group and 78% in cesarean group.


Keywords


Continuation rate, Expulsion, Intra–cesarean insertion, Intrauterine contraceptive devices, PPIUCD, Post placental insertion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Post-partum IUCD reference manual; Family Planning Division. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2010: 1-3

Park K. Social and Preventive medicine 22nd ed. Jabalpur. Banarsidas Bhanot;2013:471-2.

World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraceptive use: a WHO family planning cornerstone. 4th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization;2010:3-4

Grimes D, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Stanwood NL. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2010;12:CD003060.

Bluestone J, Chase R, Lu ER. USAID IUD guideline for family planning services programme 3rd edition. A Problem-solving Reference Manual;2008.

Halder A, Sowmya MS, Gayen A, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee S, Datta S. A prospective study to evaluate vaginal insertion and aintra cesarean insertion of post-partum intrauterine contraceptive device. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(1):35-41.

Katheit G, Agarwal J. Evaluation of PPIUCD in terms of awareness, acceptance and expulsion in a tertiary care center. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2:539-543.

Soni M, Sharma V, Bhat MP, Sharma A. Post-placental postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices insertion: our scenario. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:766-9.

Mishra S. Evaluation of safety, efficacy and expulsion of post-placental and intra-cesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD). J. Obstet. Gynaecol. India. 2014 Oct; 64(5):337-43.

Kumar S, Sethi R, Balasubramaniam S, Charurat E, Lalchandani K, Semba R, et al. Women’s experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices use in India. Reprod Health. 2014;11:32.

Hooda R, Mann S, Nanda S, Gupta A, More H, Bhutani J. Immediate postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions in caesarean and vaginal deliveries: a comparative study of follow-up outcomes. Int J Reproduc Med. 2016 Aug 17;2016.

Shukla M, Qureshi S, Chandrawati. Post placental Intrauterine device insertion. A five year experience at a tertiary care center in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:432-5.

Araujo VB, Ortiz L, Smith J. Postpartum IUD in Paraguay: A case series of 3000 cases. Contraception. 2012;86:173-186.

Blumenthal P, Shiliya N, Neukom J, Chilambwe J, Vwalika B, Prager B at al. Expulsion rates and satisfaction levels among immediate post partum IUD user in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia. Contraception. 2011;84:320.

El Beltagy NS, Darwish EA, Kasem MS, Hefila NM. Comparison between Cupper T380 IUD and Multiload 375 IUD in early post partum insertion. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2011 Jun 30;16(2):143-8.