DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20175043

A case report of successful retrieval of missing Cu T from peritoneal cavity in a case of pelvic Tuberculosis

Bratati Moitra, Megha Bhagat

Abstract


The incidence of missing IUCD is 0.5-2%. Usually the cause is either expulsion or perforation of uterus. Sometimes the perforated IUCD remains asymptomatic for years and found incidentally later. We are hereby presenting a case of 35 years female P3 L3 who had Cu T insertion 3 years back. She was asymptomatic for more than 2 and ½ years and then presented with severe pain abdomen for which she was evaluated and exploratory laparotomy was done and Cu T was found embedded in the serosa of rectosigmoid colon which was covered by dense omental adhesions


Keywords


IUCD, Laprotomy, Missing CuT, Perforation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Zafar M, Murataza N, Saeed S. Two displace intrauterine contraceptive devices CuT. JCPSP. 2004;14:427-9.

Schaap B. IUD acceptance in rural Madhya Pradesh: Results of acceptors interview. J Fam Welf. 1993;39:52-4.

Heinberg EM, Mc Coy TW, Paric R. The perforated intrauterine devices: Endoscopic retrieval. JSL. 2008;12:97-100.

Lawal SO, Giwa-Osagie OF, Ogedengbe OK, Usifoh C. A review of IUCD related problems in Lagos University Teaching Hospital (LUTH). West Afr J Med. 1993;12:144-7.

Rahman GA, Yusuf IF. Asymptomatic missing intrauterine contraceptive device found incidentally at Laprotomy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(4):255-6.

Toivonen J, Lukkainen T, Allown H. Protective effect of intrauterine release of levonorgesteral on Pelvic infection. Three years comparative experience of levonorgestrel and Copper releasing intrauterine devices. J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;77:261-4.

Guidelines for IUCD insertion for Medical officers. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2003.