DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20173490

Peripartum hysterectomy: a five year review at a tertiary care centre

Deepak A. V., K. J. Jacob, Sumi P. Maria

Abstract


Background: Peripartum hysterectomy is a life-saving procedure resorted to when conservative measures fail to control obstetric haemorrhage. Several predisposing factors, suboptimal care and lack of infrastructure may lead to this emergency procedure. We wanted to find out factors associated with peripartum hysterectomy and the adverse maternal outcomes at our centre.

Methods: A retrospective case series analysis of 40 cases of peripartum hysterectomy performed over a period of 5 years from January 2010 to December 2014 at Government Medical College Hospital, Thrissur, Kerala was done.

Results: The incidence of peripartum hysterectomy was 0.29%. The most common indication for peripartum hysterectomy was hysterectomy was uterine atony (50%). Thirty-five women (88%) were between 20 and 35 years. Most of the subjects were unbooked. There were two maternal deaths (case fatality rate of 5%) following peripartum hysterectomy during this period. All the subjects required blood transfusion.

Conclusions: Prompt performance hysterectomy before the patient’s clinical condition deteriorates is the key to success. The incidence of adherent placenta is increasing, so every effort should be taken to reduce the caesarean section rates globally.

 


Keywords


Abnormal placentation, Atonic postpartum haemorrhage, Peripartum hysterectomy, Placenta accrete, Maternal morbidity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rossi AC, Lee RH, Chmait RH. Emergency postpartum hysterectomy for uncontrolled postpartum bleeding: a systematic review. Obstetr Gynecol. 2010;115(3):637-44.

Akar ES, Yilmaz BY, Yilmaz Z. “Emergency peripartum hysterectomy”, European J Obstetr Gynaecol Reproduct Biol. 2004;113(2):178-81.

Park EH. Postpartum hemorrhage and other problems of the third stage. High Risk Pregnancy. Management options. 1999:1231-46.

Sakse A, Weber T, Nickelsen C, Secher NJ. Peripartum hysterectomy in Denmark 1995–2004. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(12):1472-5.

Kwee A, Bots ML, Visser GH, Bruinse HW. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: a prospective study in The Netherlands. European J Obstetr Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2006;124(2):187-92.

Whiteman MK, Kuklina E, Hillis SD. “Incidence and determinants of peripartum hysterectomy” J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;108(6):1486-92.

Waterstone M, Murphy JD, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study Commentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic disease. Bmj. 2001;322(7294):1089-94.

Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Theodora M, Antsaklis A. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2007;86(2):223-7.

Bai SW, Lee HJ, Cho JS, Park YW, Kim SK, Park KH. Peripartum hysterectomy and associated factors. Obstetrical gynecological survey; 2003;58(7):456-7.

Omole-Ohonsi A, Olayinka HT. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a developing country. J Obstetr Gynaecol Canada. 2012;34(10):954-60.

Sturdee DW, Rushton DI. Caesarean and post‐partum hysterectomy 1968–1983. BJOG: An Internat J Obstetr Gynaecol. 1986;93(3):270-4.

Zeteroglu S, Ustun Y, Engin-Ustun S, Kamasci N. “Peripartum hysterectomy in a teaching hospital in eastern region of Turkey”, Europ J Obstetr Gynaecol Reproduct Biol. 2005;120(1):57-62.