DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172562

Feto-maternal outcome in grand multipara

Rajib Roy, Manisha Vernekar

Abstract


Background: Grand multiparity has been considered as obstetric hazards both to the mother and foetus and thus, viewed with great caution. In present set up grand multiparity is associated with increased likelihood of feto-maternal complications.

Methods: The study was conducted to determine the feto-maternal outcome in grand multipara pregnancy.

Results: In present study, the prevalence of grand multipara was 0.72% out of 15196 deliveries in the period from September 2010 to august 2012. 79.1% of the grand multipara women belonged to the age group of 31-40 years. A majority of the women were in Para 5. Most of the women had no antenatal care attendance. The highest prevalence of grand multipara women was seen among Muslim community (1.65%). A majority (59.1%) of the women were anemic. Caesarean section rate was 30.0% in our study. Post-partum hemorrhage was the most common complication encountered. 7.0% were macrosomic babies, whereas 8.7% were LBW babies. There were 10 perinatal deaths, birth asphyxia being the most important cause for the perinatal mortality. There were no maternal deaths.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that, there is increase in antenatal and intra-partum maternal complications like anaemia, hypertensive disorder, preterm labour, increase in the rate of caesarean section, PPH etc., leading to severe maternal morbidity. So, the study concludes that in grand multipara pregnancy, both the woman and the fetus are at a greater risk during pregnancy and labour. This risk can be effectively reduced with good antenatal care and delivery by trained personnel.


Keywords


Anaemia, Grand multipara, Maternal mortality, Obstructed labour, Post-partum haemorrhage, Uterine rupture

Full Text:

PDF

References


Nour NM. An introduction to maternal mortality. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(2):77-81.

Methal A, Rubaee A. Risk of grand multiparity on both mother and fetus. Med J Babylon. 2005;2(3):288-94.

Rayamajhi R, Thapa M, Pande S. The challenge of grand multiparity in obstetric practice. Kathmandu University Med J. 2006;4(1):70-4.

Roman H, Robillard PY, Verspyck E, Hulsey TC, Marpeau L, Barau G. Obstetric and neonatal outcome in grand multiparity. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(6):1294-9.

D’souza K, Monteiro FNP, Jayaprakash K, Bhagavath P, Krishnan S. Spectrum of grand multiparity. J Clini Diagnos Res. 2011;5(6):1247-50.

Hinkula M, Kauppila A, Näyhä S, Pukkala E. Cause-specific mortality of grand multiparous women in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(4):367-73.

Bugg GJ, Atwal GS, Maresh M. Grandmultiparae in a modern setting. BJOG. 2002;109:249-53.

Ohonsi AO, Ashini AO. Grand multiparity: Obstetric performance in Aminu Kano teaching hospital, Kano, Nigeria. Nigerian J Clini Practice. 2011;14(1):6-9.

Shahid R, Mushtaq M. Complications of grand multiparity. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2009;4:1-5

Rizwan N, Parveen G, Abbasi RM. Frequency of grand multiparity and its feto-maternal outcome at Liaquat University Hospital, Hyderabad. Isra Med J. 2009;1(2): 49-53.

Rayis D A, Ali AA, Abbaker A, Adam I. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of grand multiparity in Kassala hospital, eastern Sudan. Khartoum Med J. 2011;4(1):554-7.

Begum S. Age and parity related problems affecting outcome of labour in grand multiparas. Pak J Med Res. 2003;42(4):179-84.

Rizk D E E, Khalfan M, Ezimokhai M. Obstetric outcome in grand multipara in the United Arab Emirates: A case control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;264:194-8.

Munim S, Rahbar M H, Rizvi R M, Mustaq N. The effect of grand multiparity on pregnancy related complications: The Aga Khan University Experience. J Pak Med Ass. 2000;50:54-9.

Yasir R, Perveen F, Ali L, Perveen S, Tayyab S. Grand multiparity- still an obstetric risk for developing countries. J Modern Med Dent Sci. 2010;16(2):264-7.

Ogedengbe OK, Ogunmokun AA. Grand multiparity in Lagos, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2003;10(4):216-9.

Irvine LM, Otigbah C, Crawford A, Setchell ME. Grand multiparity- an obstetric problem in Great Britain in the 90’s? J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;16(4):217-23.

Samueloff A, Schimmel MS, Eidelman Al. Grand multiparity. Is it a perinatal risk? Clin Perinatol. 1998;25(3): 529-38.

Mutihir JT. Obstetric outcome of the grand multipara in Jos, Nigeria. J Med Tropics. 2005;7(1):14-20.

Lyrenas S. Labor in the grand multipara. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;53(1):6-12.

Shahida SM, Islam MA, Begum S, Hossain MA, Azam MS. Maternal outcome of grand multipara. Mymensingh Med J. 2011;20(3):381-5.

Benecke C, Siebert TI, Kruger TF, Grove D. Antepartum and intrapartum complications in grand multiparous patients compared with multiparous patients at Tygerberg Hospital. South African J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;11(1):14-6.

Humphrey MD. Is grand multiparity an independent predictor of pregnancy risk? Med J Aust. 2003;179:294-6.

Yasmeen L, Rasheed T, Syed S. Is grand multiparity still a risk factor for obstetric complications? Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2010;6(1):58-61.

Nordin NM, Fen CK, Isa S, Symonds EM. Is grandmultiparity a significant risk factor in this new millennium? Malaysian J Med Sci. 2006;13(2):52-60.

Eze JN, Okaro JM, Okafor MH. Outcome of pregnancy in the grand multipara in Enugu, Nigeria. Trop J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;23(1):8-11.