DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20172929

A cross sectional study on willingness and acceptabily: PPIUCD by primipara mothers at a tertiary care hospital, Tamil Nadu

T. K. Shaanthy Gunasingh, T. S. Meena, R. Mothilal

Abstract


Background: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device is a postpartum family planning method which provides spacing to the next pregnancy and also it helps to avoid unwanted / unintended pregnancy during postpartum period. Our aim was to study the willingness and acceptability of Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among primi paraous women and compare them as a factor of route of insertion (vaginal versus caesarean).

Methods: A cross sectional analytical study was done in a tertiary care teaching institution to know the willingness and acceptance among primi paraous delivery (either vaginal and caesarean deliveries) for the period of three months using the hospital records that a total number of 587 primi paraous deliveries and among them 433 mothers had Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device over the three months period, were taken as a secondary data and studied for their willingness and acceptance for Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device.

Results: 82.8 % of primi paraous women were showing willingness for Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device and 73.8 % of them had Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertion. Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device insertions were more in caesarean deliveries than in vaginal deliveries of mothers with one child.

Conclusions: Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device is a strong weapon in the family planning and should be encouraged in both vaginal and caesarean deliveries. The acceptability of Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device in women with one child was effective and statistically significant at p value is < 0.05.


Keywords


Contraceptive device, Postpartum, Willingness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Jairaj S, Dayyala S. A Cross Sectional Study on Acceptability and Safety of IUCD among Postpartum Mothers at Tertiary Care Hospital, Telangana. J Clinic Diagnost Res. 2016;10(1):LC01-LC04.

Kanhere AV, Pateriya P, Jain M. Acceptability and feasibility of immediate postpartum IUCD insertion in a tertiary care centre in Central India. Internat J Reproduc Contracep Obste Gynecol. 2017 ;4(1):179-84.

Barala S, Maheswari S, Sharma P. Analysis of awareness, acceptance, safety and continuation rate of post placental and intra caesarean insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device. IJRCOG. 2016;5(6):1974-80.

Kanmani K, Gokulakrishnan G, Rani PR. Acceptance of postplacental intrauterine contraceptive device: recent increase in trend. IJRCOG. 2016;5(5):1341-4.

Kharkwal S, Sharma S, Manisha K. A comparative study of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device acceptance between primiparaous and multiparous women in a tertiary care centre. IJRCOG. 2016;5(7):2304-6.

Maluchuru S, Aruna V. PostPartum-Intrauterine Device Insertion-2yr Experience at a Tertiary Care Center in Guntur Medical College / Govt. General Hospital, Guntur. J Dent Medic Sci. 2015;14(7):2279-861.

Landge JA and Armaity D. Awareness and Practice of Family Planning Method among married women in an urban slum area, Mumbai, Maharashtra. EJPMR. 2016; 3(2):294-7.

District Level Household and Facility Survey (Reproductive and Child Health Project). In: DLHS-4; State Report: Tamil Nadu; 2012

Shukla M, Qureshi S, Chandrawati. Post-placental intrauterine device insertion - A five-year experience at a tertiary care centre in North India. Indian J Medic Res. 2012;136(3):432-35.