DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171530

The rate and indications of caesarean section in a tertiary care hospital at Jaipur, India

Meeta Gupta, Vineeta Garg

Abstract


Background: Caesarean section is one of the most widely performed surgical procedures in obstetrics worldwide. It was mainly evolved as a lifesaving procedure for mother and foetus during the difficult delivery. To analyze the rate and indications for C-Section and associated maternal morbidity and mortality were the main objectives of present study.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over a period of one year from 1st Jan 2016 to 31st Dec 2016 at the Department of OBG, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur (Rajasthan), North India. Data of patients who delivered by C-Section in our hospital during the defined study period was recorded and a statistical analysis of various parameters namely, the caesarean section rates, its indications, the patient’s morbidity and mortality was done.

Results: The total numbers of women delivered over the study period were 2959, out of which C-Sections were 931. The overall CS rate was 31.46%. Previous LSCS was the leading indication to the CS rate (36.52%) followed by arrest of labour (13.65%), CPD (12.03%), foetal distress (11.82%), breech presentation (7.52%), oligohydroamnios/IUGR (5.16%) and failed induction of labour (3.54%). 11.60% patients had various complications mainly infection (5.58%) and haemorrhage (3.98%). There was no mortality during this period.

Conclusions: Being a tertiary care hospital, a high rate of Caesarean deliveries was observed. Individualization of the indication and careful evaluation, following standardized guidelines, practice of evidenced-based obstetrics and audits in the institution, can help us limit CSR.


Keywords


Caesarean section, Caesarean rates, Indications of CS

Full Text:

PDF

References


National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1386-97.

Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010), Background Paper, No 30.

Belizán JM, Cafferata ML, Althabe F, Buekens P. Risk of patient choice caesarean. Birth. 2006;33:167- 9

Caughey AB, Cahill AG. Safe prevention of the primarycesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus. 2014;1:2-19.

Stanton C, Ronsmans C. Recommendations for routine reporting on indications for caesarean delivery in developing countries. Birth. 2008; 35:204-11.

Torloni MR, Betran AP, Souza JP, Widmer M, Allen T, Gulmezoglu M, et al. Classifications for caesarean section: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2011;6:e1456.

Singh G, Gupta ED. Rising incidence of caesarean section in rural area in Haryana, India: a retrospective analysis. Internet J Gynecol Obstetr. 2013;17(2):1-5.

Subhashini R, Uma N. Changing trends in Caesarean delivery. IAIM. 2015;2(3):96-102.

Yadav RG, Maitra N. Examining cesarean delivery rates using the Robson’s ten group classification. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):1.

Manjulatha B, Sravanthi TP. Caesarean section rates in a Teaching Hospital: a ten year review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14(8):1-5.

Shabnam S. Caesarean section delivery in India: causes and concerns, international union for the scientific study of population, session 221, assessments of facility-based delivery services.

Shiba M, Sachin P, Niranjan M, Janki M. Trends in cesarean delivery: rate and indications. J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;64(4):251-4

26. Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(1):29-38.

Ba’aqeel. Cesarean delivery rates in Saudi Arabia: a ten-year review. Ann Saudi Med. 2009;29(3):179-83.

Tolla˚nes MC. Increased rate of Caesarean sections—causes and consequences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009;129(13):1329-31.

WHO Statement on caesarean section rates; 2015, WHO reference number: WHO/RHR/15.02. Available at http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/ maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/en/.

Caesarean section rates and indications in subSaharan Africa: a multi-country study from medecins sans frontieres; PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44484.

WHO Euro Health for all database, 2014. Available at http://data.euro.who.int/hfadb/(53).

Samdal LJ, Steinsvik KR, Pun P, Dani P, Roald B, Stray-Pedersen B, Bøhler E. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016;66(Suppl 1):284-8.

Jawa A, Garg S, Tater A, Sharma U. Indications and rates of lower segment caesarean section at tertiary care hospital-an analytical study. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:3466-9.

Preetkamal, Kaur H, Nagpal M. Is current rising trend of cesarean sections justified? Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6:872- 6.

Yadav S, Kaur S, Yadav SS, Thakur B. Analysis of caesarean rate, indications and complications: review from medical college Ambala, Haryana, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:3326-9.

Saxena N, Sharma B, Gupta V, Negi KS. A six year appraisal of caesarean delivery at a teaching hospital in Uttarakhand. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:4369-72.

18. Sarma P, Boro RC, Acharjee PS. An analysis of indications of caesarean sections at Tezpur medical college and hospital, Tezpur (a government hospital). Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:1364-7.

Chavda D, Goswam K, Dudhrejiya K. A cross sectional study of 1000 lower segment cesarean section in obstetrics and gynecology department of P. D. U Medical College, Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2017;6(4):1186-91.

Nikhil A, Desai A, Vijay K, Bhumika K, Riddhi P. Analysis of trends in LSCS rate and indications of LSCS: a study in a Medical College Hospital GMERS, Sola, Ahmedabad. Int J Pharm Bio-Sci. 2015;2(1):1-5.

Bade P, Kendre V, Jadhav Y, Wadagale A. An analysis of indications for caesarean section at government medical college, Latur. Intern J Recent Trends Sci Technol. 2014;11(1):6-8.

Padmaleela K, Thomas V, Prasad KV. An analysis of the institutional deliveries and their outcomes in government teaching hospitals of Andhra Pradesh, India. IJHSR. 2013;3(5):76-81.

Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, Wang X, Ruan Y, Zou L et al. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Dec 12;14:410.

Santhanalakshmi C, Gnanasekaran V, Chakravarthy AR. A retrospective analysis of cesarean section in a tertiary care hospital. 2015;4:2097-9.

Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S et al. A high prevalence of caesarean section rate in East Delhi. Indian J Comm Med. 2007;32(3):222-4.

Kambo I, Bedi N, Dhillon BS, Saxena NC. A critical appraisal of caesarean section rates at teaching hospitals in India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;79(2):151-8.

Osman BALCI, Kazım GEZGİNÇ, Ali ACAR. The outcome analysis of cesarean section cases in one-year period. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med 2007;13:26-28.

Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC): resource overview, 2016. Available at http://www.acog.org/Womens-Health/Vaginal-BirthAfter-Cesarean-VBAC

Geen JE, Meclean F, Usher SR. Caesarean section study of latin American Hospital. Am J obstet Gynaecol. 1982;142.

Mylonas I, Friese K. Indications for and risks of elective caesarean section. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(29-30):489-95.