Utilization of antenatal care and its influence on fetal-maternal outcome: a tertiary care experience

Rajlaxmi Mundhra, Ahanthem S. Singh, Manika Agarwal, Rakesh Kumar

Abstract


Background: To compare the sociodemographical characteristics, obstetrical complications, and fetal-maternal outcomes in booked and unbooked mothers.

Methods: In a prospective study over an 18 month period, outcomes of pregnancy booked for antenatal care were compared with that of unbooked women, who delivered in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NEIGRIHMS.

Results: 802 patients were recruited to study. 479 (59.73%) were unbooked and 323 cases (40.27%) were booked. Compared with booked mothers, majority of unbooked mothers belonged to lower social class, came from remote areas and had a significant higher incidence of teenage pregnancy and Grand multiparity. Unbooked mothers had higher incidence of anemia (p< 0.0001), pregnancy induced hypertension (p= 0.033), post dated pregnancy (p<0.0001) and malpresentation (p= 0.013). Three maternal deaths were noted in the unbooked group compared to only one death in the booked group. Overall, maternal morbidity was 4.74%, with a significant difference between the two groups (p< 0.0001). 10.33% babies of unbooked and 6.12% of booked cases needed neonatal intensive care (p= 0.036). The incidence of meconium stained amniotic fluid, birth asphyxia, perinatal deaths, low birth weight and APGAR score <7 at 1 min  and 5 min were significantly higher in babies of unbooked mothers.

Conclusion: Poor utilization of antenatal care is associated with adverse fetal and maternal outcome.


Keywords


Antenatal care, Booked mothers, Unbooked mothers, Maternal complications, Perinatal outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


Park K. Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine.21st edition. Jabalpur India. M/s Banarasidas Bhanot.2011

National population policy- 2000. Department of Family welfare. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India, New Delhi.

Fawcus SR, Crowther CA, Van Baelen P, Marumahoko J. Booked and Unbooked mothers delivering at Harare Maternity Hospital, Zimbabwe: a comparison of maternal characteristics and fetal outcome. Cent Afr J Med 1992 Oct;38(10):402-8.

Chigbu B, Onwere S, Kamanu CI, Aluka C, Okoro O, Adibe E. Pregnancy outcome in Booked and Unbooked Mothers in South Eastern Nigeria East Afr Med J. 2009 Jun; 86(6): 267-71.

Harrison KA. Child bearing, health and social and social priorities: a survey of 22774 consecutive hospital births in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92 suppl 5:1-119.

de Jong G, Pattinson RC, Odendaal HJ. Influence of perinatal care on stillbirths in patients of low socio-economic class .S Afr Med J 1988;74:53-4.

Owolabi A T, Fatusi A O, Kuti O, Adeyemi A, Faturoti S O, Obiajuwa PO. Maternal complications and perinatal outcomes in booked and unbooked Nigerian mothers. Singapore Med J 2008; 49(7): 526-531.

Riffat Jaleel, Ayesha Khan. Obstetric morbidity in the Booked versus non booked patients- A comparative study at Lyari general Hospital. Pakistan Journal of surgery 2008;24(3):196-202.

Majeed R, Memon Y, Majeed F, Shaikh NP, Rajar UD. Risk factors of birth asphyxia. J Ayub Med Coll 2007;19(3):67-71.

Ekwempu CC. The influence of antenatal care on pregnancy outcome. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;1(1):67-71.

Treacy A, O’Donovan M, Byrne P. Perinatal outcome in unbooked women at the Rotunda Hospital. Ir Med J 2002;95(2):44-47.