PPIUCD versus interval IUCD (380a) insertion: a comparative study in a referral hospital of Karnataka, India
Keywords:PPIUCD, Interval IUCD, Acceptance, Safety
Background: Comparative evaluation of PPIUCD and interval IUCD in terms of incidence of failure, expulsions, bleeding p/v and other complications.
Methods: Total 200 willing women after counseling in antenatal, early labour or post natal were inserted PPIUCD after excluding chorioamnionitis, PROM >18hrs, unresolved PPH, puerperal sepsis. Another 100 willing women were inserted interval IUCD after excluding contraindications. All were followed up to 6 months.
Results: Expulsions rate was significantly higher in PPIUCD as compared to interval insertions (5.5% v/s 5%). Number of removal of IUCD was almost similar in both the groups (6.5% V/S 7%). Common causes of PPIUCD removal were social.
Conclusions: Postpartum inserting of IUCD is safe effective, feasible and reversible method of contraception.
Bonilla Rosales F, Aguilar Zamudio Me, Cazares Montero ML, Hernaderz Ortiz ME, Luna Ruiz MA.
Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device 380A applied immediately postpartum and after delayed period. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43(1):5-10.
EL Beltagy NS, Darwish EA, Kasem MS, Hefila NM. Comparison between Cupper T380 IUD and Multiload 375 IUD in early post-partum insertion. - East fertility Society J. 2010;16:143-8.
Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, Dilbaz B, Akin A, Taskin L, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complication of IUD insertion in immediate. Postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006;74:376-81.
Ricalde Roger Lara. Gerardo Menocal Tobias. Carlos Ramos Perez. Norma Velazquez Ramirez. Estudiocomparativo al azar Cu375 y Tcu 380A colocados durante el postparto. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006;74:306-11.