Comparison between roll-over test and placental localization for early prediction of preeclampsia

Authors

  • Moneet Walia Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Aparajita Sophia D’souza Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • Garima Gupta Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20150784

Keywords:

Preeclampsia, Placental localization, Roll-over test

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a common disorder of pregnancy and a major cause of maternal, foetal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. The roll-over test is based on the observation that significant supine hypertension is present for a period of 8 to 10 weeks prior to the onset of preeclampsia. The objective of the present study was to study and compare roll-over test with placental localization for early prediction of preeclampsia.

Methods: In this prospective number bound study, a total of 200 unselected singleton pregnant females were included. All women were subjected to ultrasonography for placental localization at 24 weeks of gestation. They were subjected to roll-over test twice, first at 24 weeks and then at 28–30 weeks of gestation. Either the development of preeclampsia as per ACOG criteria or delivery was taken as end point in this study.

Results: Of 200 women, 148 had a central placenta and 52 had a unilateral placenta. 37 women had preeclampsia, out of which 68 % had a unilateral placenta and 51 % had positive roll-over test. However when the roll-over test was performed at 24 weeks, it was negative in all study cases. So it had got no role as an early predictor of preeclampsia.

Conclusions: This study concludes that ultrasonographic localization of the placenta seems to be a simple and easy to perform predictive test for incipient preeclampsia as compared to the roll-over test.

References

Kaunitz AM, Hughes JM, Grimes DA, Rochat RW, Kafrisen ME. Causes of maternal mortality in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 65:605-12.

Knutzen VK, Davey DA: Hypertension in pregnancy, perinatal mortality and causes of fetal death. S Afr Med J. 1977;51:675-9.

Scott JS: pregnancy toxaemia associated with hydatidiform mole. J Obst Gynecol Br. Empire. 65; 689-701.

Karbhari D, Harrigan JT, Lamagra R: The supine pressure test as a predictor of incipient pre-eclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1977;127:620-2.

Dekker GA: Prediction and pregnancy induced hypertensive disorders: a clinical and pathophysiologic study (Thesis). Rotterdam: Erasmus University. 1989.

Robertson WB, Brosens I, Dixon G: The pathological response of the vessels of the placental bed to hypertensive pregnancy. J. Pathol Bactriol. 1967;93:581-92.

Dekker GA, Sibai BM: Early detection of preeclampsia. Am J. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:160-72.

Koffinas AD, Penry M, Swain M, Hatijis CG: Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. Am J. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1536-9.

Pai MV, Pillai J: Placental laterality by ultrasound a simple yet reliable predictive test for preeclampsia. J Obstst Gynecol India. 2005;65:431-3.

Fleischer A, Schulman H, Farmakides G et al: Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;154:806-13.

Schulman H, Ducey J, Farmakides G et at: The significance of divergernt systolic-diastolic ratios. Am J.tet. Gynaecol. 1987;157:1539-44.

Kalanithi LE, Illuzzi JL, Nossov VB, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental location. J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26:1481-9.

Kakkar T, Singh V, Razdan R, et al. Placental Laterality as a Predictor for Development of Preeclampsia. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2013;63(1):22-5.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-19

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles