DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171431

Comparative study of ropivacaine (0.5%) plain versus levobupivacaine (0.5%) plain in gynecological surgeries

Sunita Jain, Hari Prasad Bendwal, Pooja Deodhar, Pawan Bhambani, Rakesh Romday, Preeti Jain

Abstract


Background: Regional anesthesia increasingly used for gynecological surgeries, has advantage of decreased stress response to surgery, decreased cardiorespiratory depression, with improved postoperative analgesia.

Methods: This randomized, prospective, double blind study was conducted at Amaltas Institute of Medical Sciences, Banger Dewas in Department of Anesthesia between June 2016-December 2016. Sixty patients who were posted for gynecological surgeries were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups: Group R received 3.5 ml (17.5 mg) 0.5% ropivacaine plain and Group L received 3.5 ml (17.5 mg) 0.5% levobupivacaine plain. The onset and duration of sensory and motor block and any undesirable side effects were noted.

Results: Demographic parameters were comparable between the two groups (P >0.05). Onset of sensory and motor block was significantly faster in Group L, duration of motor and sensory block was significantly less in Group R. Patients in group R were hemodynamically stable (P = 0.032) compared to group L.

Conclusions: Both ropivacaine and levobupivacaine have the desirable blocking property and can be used in gynecological surgeries. Ropivacaine showed shorter duration of sensory and motor block allowed early mobilization and early recovery of patients.


Keywords


Gynecological surgeries, Levobupivacaine, Regional anesthesia, Ropivacaine

Full Text:

PDF

References


Leone S, DiCiani S, Fanelli ACG. Pharmacology, toxicology and clinical use of new long acting local anesthesia ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed. 2008;79:92-105.

Fournier R, Faust A, Chassot O, Gamulin Z. Levobupivacaine 0.5% provides longer analgesia after sciatic nerve block using the Labat approach than the same dose of ropivacaine in foot and ankle surgery. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(5):1486-9.

McNamee DA, McClelland AM, Scott S, Milligan KR, Westman L, Gustafsson U. Spinal anaesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine 5 mg ml (-1) with bupivacaine 5 mg ml (-1) for major orthopaedic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89(5):702-6.

Lee YY, Muchhal K, Chan CK. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31(6):637-41.

Lee YY, Ngan Kee WD, Muchhal K, Chan CK. Randomized double-blind comparison of ropivacaine-fentanyl and bupivacaine- fentanyl for spinal anaesthesia for urological surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005;49:1477-82.

Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, Heinz MT, Sitzwohl C, Kapral S et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Anal. 2002;94:194-8.

McClure JH. Ropivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1996;76(2):300-7.

Simpson D, Curran MP, Oldfield V, Keating GM. Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management. Drugs. 2005;65(18):2675-717.

Nakamura G, Ganem EM, Rugolo LM, Castiglia YM. Effects on mother and fetus of epidural and combined spinal-epidural techniques for labor analgesia. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2009;55(4):405-9.

McClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs. 2000;60(5):1065-93.

Lee YY, Ngan Kee WD, Fong SY, Liu JT, Gin T. The median effective dose of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine after intrathecal injection in lower limb surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(4):1331-4.

Kanai Y, Katsuki H, Takasaki M. Comparison of the anesthetic patency and intracellular concentration of S (-) and R (+) bupivacaine and ropivacaine in cray fish giant axon in vitro. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:415-20.

Sinnott CJ, Strichartz GR. Levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine for sciatic nerve block in the rat. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(4):294-303.

Alley EA, Kopacz DJ, McDonald SB, Liu SS. Hyperbaric spinal levobupivacaine: a comparison to racemic bupivacaine in volunteers. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(1):188-93.

Gautier PE, De Kock M, Van Steenberge A, Poth N, Lahaye-Goffart B, Fanard L et al. Intrathecal ropivacaine for ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiol. 1999;91(5):1239-45.

Piangatelli C, De Angelis C, Pecora L, Recanatini F, Cerchiara P, Testasecca D. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in the infraclavicular brachial plexus block. Minerva Anestesiol. 2006;72(4):217-21.

Chung CJ, Choi SR, Yeo KH, Park HS, Lee SI, Chin YJ. Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison to hyperbaric bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(1):157-61.

Mantouvalou M, Ralli S, Arnaoutoglou H, Tziris G, Papadopoulos G. Spinal anesthesia: comparison of plain ropivacaine, bupivacaine and levobupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2008;59(2):65-71.

Whiteside JB, Burke D, Wildsmith JA. Comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 5%) with bupivacaine 0.5% (in glucose 8%) for spinal anaesthesia for elective surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(3):304-8.

Breebaart MB, Vercauteren MP, Hoffmann VL, Adriaensen HA. Urinary bladder scanning after day-case arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia: comparison between lidocaine, ropivacaine, and levobupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90:309-13.

Heavner JE. Cardiac toxicity of local anesthetics in the intact isolated heart model: a review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27(6):545-55. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(3):618-26.