DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20171423

Comparative evaluation of postpartum IUCD versus interval IUCD at a tertiary care centre in Allahabad, India

Urvashi Singh, Shubhangi Sonkar, Preeti Yadav, Meena Dayal, Veena Gupta, Somya Saxena

Abstract


Background: The use of Cu T in postpartum period can provide long term and effective contraception and this study compares PPIUCD versus interval IUCD.

Methods: 300 women enrolled in the study were divided into two groups. Postpartum group-150; Postplacental or within 10 minutes/intracaesarean/within 48 hrs of delivery. Interval Group 150; after 6 weeks of delivery / postmenstrual. Cu T 380A was used in the study. Contraindication for PPIUCD were between 48 hrs and 6 wks postpartum, chorioaminionitis, PROM >18 hrs, unresolved PPH and puerperal sepsis. All were followed up for 6 months.

Results: The continuation rate at 6 months was 81.81% in interval group and 88.23% in postpartum group. Complications occurred in 15.33% cases after PPIUCD and in 19.33% cases after interval IUCD. Expulsion rate was significantly higher in PPIUCD as compared to interval insertions (6.96% v/s 2.2%; p value <0.05). Removal rate of IUCD was almost similar in both the groups (4% in PPIUCD v/s 6.0% in interval).

Conclusions: PPIUCD is an effective, safe, convenient, low cost and long term method of postpartum contraception irrespective of the mode of delivery.


Keywords


Cu T, Interval IUCD, PPIUCD

Full Text:

PDF

References


Santhya KG. Changing Family Planning Scenario in India. Regional Health Forum WHO South-East Asia Region http://www.searo.who.int/en/Section1243/ Section 1310 / Section 1343 / Section1344/Section1836/Section1838.html , 2004 [cited 2012 May 4].;8(1).

India. National Family Health Survey-3. 2005-06 Available from: Government of India, Ministry of Health and family welfare Web site: www.nfhsindia.org/factsheet.html. cited 2012 May 3.

Xu JX, Rivera R, Dunson TR, Zhuang LQ, Yang XL and Ma GT. A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate post placental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T 380A IUD in Shanghai, People‘s Republic of China. Contraception 1996;54(1):33-8.

Morrison C, Waszak C, Katz K, Diabate F, Mate EM. Clinical outcomes of two early postpartum IUD insertion programs in Africa. Contraception. 1996;53(1):17-21.

Celen S, Moroy P, Sucak A, Aktulay A, Danisman N. Clinical outcomes of early post placental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Contraception. 2004;69:279-82.

Singal S, Bharti R, Dewan R, Divya, Dabral A, Batra A, Sharma M, Mittal P: Clinical Outcome of Postplacental Copper T 380A Insertion in Women Delivering by Caesarean: J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):OC01-4.

Kapp N, Curtis KM. Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review. Contraception. 2009;80(4):327–36.

Gupta G, Goyal R, Kadam VK, Sharma P1. The Clinical Outcome of Post Placental Copper-T-380A Insertion with Long Placental Forceps (Kelly's Forceps) After Normal Vaginal Delivery and Caesarean Section: J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2015;65(6):386-8.

Eroglu K, Akkuzu G, Vural G, Dilbaz B, Akin A, Taskin L, et al. Comparison of efficacy and complications of IUD insertion in immediate postplacental/early postpartum period with interval period: 1 year follow-up. Contraception. 2006;74:376-81.

Shukla M, Qureshi S, Chandravati: Post placental intrauterine device insertion-a five year experience at a tertiary care centre in north India. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:432-5.

Bonilla Rosales F, Aguilar Zamudio ME, Cazares Montero ML, Hernandez Ortiz ME, Luna Ruiz MA. Factors for expulsion of intrauterine device TCu380A applied immediately postpartum and after a delayed period. Rev Méd Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43:5-10.

El Beltagy NS, Darwish EA, Kasem MS, Hefila NM. Comparison between cupper T380 Iud and multi load 375 Iud in early post‐partum insertion. Middle East Fertility Society J. 2010;16:143‐8.

Tatum HJ, Beltran RS, Ramos R, Van KH, Sivin I, Schmidt FH. Immediate post placental insertion of GYNE-T 380 and GYNE-T 380 Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Randomized study. Am J Obstet and Gynecol. 1996;175(5):1231-5.

Thiery M, Van DPH, Delbeke L, Van KH. Comparative performance of two copper-wired IUDs (ML Cu 250 and T Cu 200). Immediate postpartum and interval insertion. Contracept Deliv Sys. 1980;1(1):27-35.