Effect of GnRH antagonist on follicular development and uterine biophysical profile in controlled ovarian stimulation

Authors

  • Bhawana Tiwary Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
  • Lakhbir Dhaliwal Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India
  • Shalini Gainder Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Punjab, India

Keywords:

Minimal stimulation, Intrauterine insemination, GnRH antagonist, Uterine biophysical profile

Abstract

Background: Objective of current study was to assess the effect of GnRH antagonist on follicular development, premature luteinization, uterine biophysical profile and pregnancy rate in controlled ovarian stimulation with clomiphene and gonadotropins for intrauterine insemination in women with unexplained infertility.

Methods: Randomised controlled trial. Minimal stimulation protocol with or without GnRH antagonist was compared. Setting: Infertility clinic, PGIMER, Chandigarh. Patients: Couples with unexplained infertility, age of female partner between 20-39 years. Intervention: GnRH antagonist 0.25 mg since follicle size 14 mm till hCG administration. Main outcome measures: Follicle characteristics, premature luteinisation, uterine biophysical profile and pregnancy rate.  

Results: The mean number of follicles recruited in group A was 2.32 ± 1.01 while that in group B (receiving GnRH antagonist) it was 4.10 ± 1.69. Statistically significant increase in total biophysical profile score was observed in periovulatory phase in the antagonist group. 40% women in group A had premature luteinization whereas only 4% women in group B suffered from premature luteinization. 20% women who received GnRH antagonist conceived against only 6% in group A, this difference however was not statistically significant

Conclusions: GnRH antagonist has a role in increasing the number of follicles recruited. Furthermore, GnRH antagonist can improve the total uterine biophysical profile score by improving the endometrial thickness, endometrial pattern, blood flow and decreasing the impedance to the blood flow in uterine artery. The drug can potentially help in improving pregnancy rates by decreasing the rate of premature luteinisation.  

References

Goverde AJ, McDonell J, Vermeiden JP, Schats R, Rutten FF, Shoemaker J. Intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomized trial and cost effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2000 Jan;355:13-8.

Ragni G, Somigliana E, Vegetti W. Timing of intrauterine insemination: where are we? Fertil Steril. 2004 Jul;82(1):25-6.

Klaus Feidler, Michael Ludwig. Use of clomiphene citrate in IVF and IVF/Intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2003 Dec;80(6):1521-3.

Olivennes F, Cunha-Filho JS, Fanchin R, Bouchard P, Frydman R. The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod Update. 2002 May-Jun;8(3):279-90.

Applebaum M. The uterine biophysical profile. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jan;5(1):67-8.

Salle B, Bied-Damon V, Benchaib M, Desperes S, Gaucherand P, Rudigoz RC. Preliminary report of an ultrasonography and colour Doppler uterine score to predict uterine receptivity in an in vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jun;13(6):1669-73.

Kupesic S, Bekavac I, Bjelos D, Kurjak A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Feb;20(2):125-34.

Baruffi RL, Contart P, Mauri AL, Peterson C, Felipe V, Garbellini E, et al. A uterine ultrasonographic scoring system as a method for the prognosis of embryo implantation. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Mar;19(3):99-102.

Sohail S. The uterine biophysical profile scoring validity. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Sep;15(9):556-8.

Diedrich K, Diedrich C, Santos E, Zoll E, Al-Hasani S, Reissmann T, et al. Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod. 1994 May;9(5):788-91.

Gomez-Palomares JL, Julia B, Acevedo-Martin B, Martinez-Burgos M, Hernandez ER, Ricciarelli E. Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):368-72.

Checa MA, Prat M, Robles A, Carreras R. Use of GnRH antagonist overcome the drawbacks of intrauterine insemination on weekends. Fertil Steril. 2006 Mar;85(3):573-7.

Edi-Osagie EC, Seif MW, Aplin JD, Jones CJ, Wilson G, Lieberman BA. Characterizing the endometrium in unexplained and tubal factor infertility: a multiparametric investigation. Fertil Steril. 2004 Nov;82(5):1379-89.

Chein LW, Au HK, Chen PL, Xiao J, Tzeng Cr. Assessment of uterine receptivity by the endometrial - subendometrial blood flow distribution pattern in women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002 Aug;78(2):245-51.

Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, Chao AS, Wang HS, Soong YK. Detection of the subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003 May;79(3):507-11.

Allegra A, Marino A, Coffaro F, Scaglione P, Scaglione F, Rizza G, et al. GnRH antagonist induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI stimulated cycles: a prospective randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2007 Jan;22(1):101-8.

Lambalk CB, Leader A, Olivennes F, Fluker MR, Andersen AN, Ingerslev J, et al. Treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix prevents LH rises and luteinization in stimulated intrauterine insemination: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentric trial. Hum Reprod. 2006 March;21(3):632-9.

Kosmas I, Tatsioni A, Kolibianakis EM, Verproest W, Tournaye H, Van der Elst J, et al. Effects and clinical significance of GnRH antagonist administration for IUI timing in FSH superovulated cycles: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008 Aug;90(2):367-72.

Downloads

Published

2017-02-03

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles