DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170403

Assessment of Doppler velocimetry versus nonstress test in antepartum surveillance of high risk pregnancy

Nishi Choudhury, Barun Kumar Sharma, Bikram Kishor Kanungo, Ruby Yadav, Hafizur Rahman

Abstract


Background: High risk pregnancies increase the maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality; and there is a need for appropriate investigation which can diagnose it early and predicts the morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy of Doppler velocimetry studies and NST in predicting fetal compromise in utero and compare their ability in predicting the perinatal outcome in cases of high risk pregnancies.

Methods: It was a prospective cross-sectional hospital based study conducted at Central Referral Hospital (CRH) which is a teaching hospital of Sikkim Manipal Institute of Medical Sciences (SMIMS). The study was conducted over a period of eighteen months between November 2012 and April 2014. One hundred consecutive cases of high risk pregnancies were enrolled into the study and investigated with NST (non-stress test) and Doppler velocimetry and results were correlated with perinatal outcome. In all cases, accurate gestational age was established from detailed menstrual history and ultrasonographic evidence of gestational age. Detailed examination, history and investigation were undertaken in each patient. Inclusion criteria were patients with singleton pregnancy beyond 34 weeks having one or more high risk factors. In these patients antenatal surveillance was done by Doppler and NST and results of these tests were correlated with perinatal outcome. Based on the Doppler velocimetry and NST results, the study population was divided in to four groups. Pregnant women below 34 weeks, multiple pregnancy and women with no risk factors were excluded from the study.

Results: Maximum (63%) patients belonged to pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH) group, followed by oligohydramnios (11%), and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The study showed that patients with both NST and Doppler waveform abnormal (group D) had the highest percentage of neonatal complication, NICU admissions and perinatal deaths. Even those patients with NST normal but Doppler velocimetry abnormal (group B) had comparatively higher neonatal complications. However, in group with NST abnormal and Doppler velocimetry normal (group C) had no fetal compromise. It was observed that normal NST and normal Doppler velocimetry were not statistically different in predicting fetal compromise and prediction value was low. But abnormal Doppler had statistically significant (p value = 0.021) predictive value in detecting fetal compromise. In cases with abnormal Doppler and fetal compromise, NST was still normal showing that abnormal Doppler waveform was better in predicting the bad perinatal outcome. Three out of 100 cases had absent end diastolic flow (AEDF) and all 3 were associated with perinatal morbidity with 2 perinatal deaths. Cerebroplacental ratio was < 1.08 in seven cases and all seven had neonatal complications including 3 neonatal deaths which also had AEDF. Thus, cerebroplacental ratio was better in detecting fetal compromise as compared to NST.

Conclusions: Doppler velocimetry was better in predicting fetal compromise in comparison to NST in high risk pregnancies. Normal NST and normal Doppler velocimetry were not significantly different in prediction of fetal outcome. Abnormal Doppler value was better in predicting fetal compromise in comparison to abnormal NST.


Keywords


Doppler velocimetry, High risk pregnancy, Nonstress test, Perinatal outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


WHO International Collaborative study of Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Geographic variation in the incidence of Hypertension in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:80-3.

Confidential enquiry into maternal deaths: Why mothers die? 2000-2002. The sixth report of the confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in UK. London: RCOG Press; 2004. Available from http://bja.oxfordjournals.org/content/94/4/413.full. Accessed on 12 October, 2015.

Gonzalez JM, Stamilio DM, Ural S, Macones GA, Odibo AO. Relationship between abnormal fetal testing and adverse perinatal outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:48-51.

Arias F, Daftary SN, Bhide AG, Editors. Practical guide to High Risk Pregnancy and Delivery. 3rd edition. Elsevier Science Health Science Div. 2009:17-27.

Radhika P, Lavanya R. Fetal doppler versus NST as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome in severe preeclampsia and fetal growth restriction. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56:134-8.

Giles WB, Trudinger BJ, Baird PJ. Fetal umbilical artery flow velocity wave forms and placental resistance: pathological correlation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:31-8.

Morrow RJ, Adamson SL, Bull SB. Effect of placental embolization on the umbilical arterial velocity waveform in fetal sheep. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;161:1055-60.

Callen PW. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 4th edition. Philadelphia:W.B.Saunders Company; 2000;214.

Mari G, Hanif F, Kruger M, Cosmi E, Santolaya-Forgas J, Treadwell MC. Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity: a new Doppler parameter in the assessment of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:310-6.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. FAQs: HIV and pregnancy2010.Available from: http://www.acog.org/-/media/For Patients/faq113.pdf? dmc=1 &ts= 20140929T 1400559593. Accessed on 12 October 2015.

Yelikar KA, Prabhu A, Thakre GG. Role of fetal Doppler and non-stress test in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013;63:168-72.

Phelan JP. The nonstress test: a review of 3,000 tests. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:7-10.

Ott WJ. Comparison of the non-stress test with the evaluation of centralization of blood flow for the prediction of neonatal compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999;14:38-41

Fairlie FM, Moretti M, Walker JJ. Determinants of perinatal outcome in pregnancy-induced hypertension with absence of umbilical artery end-diastolic frequencies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1084-9.

Bhatt CJ, Arora J, Shah MS. Role of color Doppler in pregnancy induced hypertension (a study of 100 cases). Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2003;13:417-20.

Malhotra N, Chanana C, Kumar S, Roy K, Sharma JB. Comparison of perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses with normal and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms. Indian J Med Sci. 2006;60:311-7.

Gramellini D, Folli MC, Raboni S, Vadora E, Merialdi A. Cerebral-umbilical Doppler ratio as a predictor of adverse perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;79:416-20.

Bano S, Chaudhary V, Pande S. Color Doppler evaluation of cerebral-umbilical pulsatility ratio and its usefulness in the diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010;20:20-5.

Shahinaj R, Manoku N, Kroi E, Tasha I. The value of the middle cerebral to umbilical artery Doppler ratio in the prediction of neonatal outcome in patient with preeclampsia and gestational hypertension. J Prenat Med. 2010;4:17-21.

Fong KW, Ohlsson A, Hannah ME, Grisaru S, Kingdom J, Cohen H, et al. Prediction of perinatal outcome in fetuses suspected to have intrauterine growth restriction: Doppler US study of fetal cerebral, renal, and umbilical arteries. Radiology. 1999;213:681-9.