DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170547

Is current rising trends of cesarean section –justified ?

. Preetkamal, Harmanpreet Kaur, Madhu Nagpal

Abstract


Background: Cesarean section has become more prevalent over the years due to various factors and is exceeding the tolerable limit specified by WHO. The objective of this study was to analyze cesarean section rates in our department and to identify the factors that contributed to rising cesarean section rate considering both institutional aspects as well as socioeconomic causes.

Methods: It was a retrospective study conducted between May 2015 to April 2016 and included all pregnant patients booked in antenatal clinic and unbooked patients admitted in early labour in whom cesarean section was conducted later along with cases coming in emergency for which cesarean section was indicated. Data was collected and categorized on the basis of age, parity, socioeconomic status, education and according to Robson’s ten group classification.

Results: The cesarean section rate was found to be 33.2% in our study. The most common indication was repeat cesarean section, fetal distress, and breech presentation. Robson’s group1 had maximum cesarean rates followed by group 5, 6 and 3.

Conclusions: Tertiary care centers cannot be expected to have a similar rate as primary and secondary ones due to high number of complex cases referred to them. Though effort should be made to keep the cesarean rate at a low level as suggested by WHO but denying it for an indicated case just to adhere to keep low rate jeopardizes maternal and fetal health. Hence no definitive guidelines can be followed and a very judicious approach is needed.

Keywords


Cesarean, Tertiary, WHO

Full Text:

PDF

References


Todman D. A history of Caesarean section: from ancient world to the modern era. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47:357-61.

Hillan EM. Caesarean section: historical background. Scot Med J. 1991;36:150-4.

Warraich Q, Esen U. Perimortem caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:690-3.

Gibbons L, Belizan JM, Lauer JA, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. Inequalities in the use of cesarean deliveries in the world. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:1-19.

World Health Organization. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: Available at http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547734_eng.pdf?ua=1 Published 2009. Accessed on 18 Mar 2015.

Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap L, Bloom SL, Wenstrom KD. Williams Obstetrics. In Prior cesarean delivery. 22nd ed. USA: McGraw-Hills; 2007: 607.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). ACOG committee opinion no. 559: cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(4):904-7.

Abalos E, Oyarzun E, Addo V. CORONIS- international study of caesarean section surgical techniques: the follow-up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13: 215.

Øian P. Veilederifødselshjelp (obstetric guidelines). Available at http://legeforeningen.no/Fagmed/Norskgynekologiskforening/Veiledere/Veileder-i fodselshjelp-2014/. Published 2014. Accessed 25 Feb2015.

Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463-4.

Mittal S, Pardeshi S, Mayadeo N, Mane J. Trends in Cesarean Delivery: Rate and Indications. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(4):251-4.

Saha S, Saha S, Das R, Chakraborty M, Bala HS, Naskar P. A paradigm shift to check the increasing trend of cesarean delivery is the need of hour: but how? J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2012;62(4):391-7.

Stavrou EP, Ford JB, Shand AW. Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;20(11):8.

Oladapo OT, Sotunsu JO, Sule-odu AO. The rise in caesarean birth rate in Sagamu, Nigeria:Reflection of changes in obstetrics practice. J Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:377-81.

Perinatal Services BC (2011). Examining caesarean delivery rates in British Columbia using the Robson Ten Classification. Part I: Understanding the Ten Groups. Vancouver.

Satcher D.The risk of lowering the caesarean delivery rate. N Engl J Med.1999;340(1):54-5.

Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S, Ohel G. Variables associated with successful vaginal birth after one caesarean section-a proposed vaginal birth after one caesarean section score. Am J Perinatol 2004;21:447-53.

Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Lahav E, Horowitz E, Hod M, Kaplan B. Induction of labour with previous caesarean section and unfavourable cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;116:173-6.

Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Haslam RR, Robinson JS. Birth after caesarean study-planned vaginal birth or planned elective repeat caesarean for women at term with a single previous caesarean birth: protocol for a patient preference study and randomized trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2007;14(7):17.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous caesarean section. Green top guidelines no.45. London(UK) RCOG Press. 2007.

Betran AP, Gulmezoglu AM, Robson M, Merialdi M, Souza JP, Wojdyla D, et al. WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America: classifying caesarean sections. Reprod Health. 2009;6:18.