DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20162654

Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy in fibroid uterus: a comparative study in tertiary care hospital in Uttarakhand, India

Divya Goswami, Monika Ramola, Vineeta Gupta, Nidhi Kumari, Rashmi Kumari

Abstract


Background: Hysterectomy comprises one of the most common elective surgeries in hysterectomy as the operative modality. The vaginal route of hysterectomy has been largely reserved for prolapsed uteri or non-descent cases with nearly normal size uteri. In the state of Uttarakhand, where specialized health services are difficult to access, abdominal route forms the prime choice for surgical treatment of fibroid uterus. A multitude of research data has suggested the superiority of vaginal over abdominal route. Despite this, there is a definite hesitation amongst gynecologists to resort to NDVH for fibroid uterus. This study was done with the objective to compare and analyze the outcome of abdominal vs. vaginal route for uterine fibroids.

Methods: A retrospective study carried out for 80 patients admitted in one year duration with the diagnosis of fibroid uterus. These patients underwent either total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) or (non-descent vaginal hysterectomy) NDVH depending upon patient discretion after thorough discussion with the operating doctor.

Results: The results displayed vaginal route to be superior in terms of operative time, intra-operative blood loss and postoperative recovery.

Conclusions: We concluded from this study that patients can be safely offered NDVH, thus minimizing the need for laparotomy for fibroid uterus.


Keywords


Total abdominal hysterectomy, Non-descent vaginal hysterectomy, Fibroid uterus

Full Text:

PDF

References


The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. National Evidence Based Clinical Guidelines. The management of menorrhagia in secondary care. The Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004. Available at https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidelines.

Vessey MP, Villard-Mackintosh L, Mc Pherson K, Coulter A, Yeater D. The epidemiology of hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;99(5);402-40.

Das S, Sheth S. Uterine volume: an aid to determine the route and technique of hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Ind. 2004;54:68-72.

Dewan R, Agarwal S, Manisha, Minocha B, Sen SK. Non-Descent vaginal hysterectomy- an experience. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2004;54:376-8.

Hoffman MS, DeCesare S, Kalter C. Abdominal hysterectomy versus trans vaginal morcellation for the removal of enlarged uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:309-13.

Tu FF, Beaumont JL, Senapati S, Gordon TEJ. Route of hysterectomy influence and teaching hospital status. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;114:73-8.

Kovak SR. Guidelines to determine the route of hysterectomy. Obstset Gynaecol. 1995;85:18-23.

Dicker RC, Greenspan JR, Strauss LT, Cowart MR, Scally MJ, Peterson HB, et al. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States. The collaborative review of sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1982;144:841-6.

Miskry T, Magos A. Randomized prospective double-blind comparison of abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in women without utero-vaginal prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;82:351-8.

L. Benassi, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, et al. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: A randomized clinical trial. AJOG. 2002;187:1561-5.

Dorsey JA, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route; patient characteristics or physician preference? Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;173:1452-60.

Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Napp V, Brown J, Hawe J, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy and the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328:129-33.

Chen B, Ren DP, Li JX, Li CD. Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective non-randomized trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):875-9.

Aniuliene R, Varzgaliene L, Varzgalis M. A comparative analysis of hysterectomies. Medicina (Kaunas). 2007;43:118-24.

Shanthini NF, Poomalar GK, Jayshree M, Bupaty A. Evaluation of complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2012;1(1):7-11.

Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M, Tucker L, Bishop M, Das A. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy- applications in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;187:1521-7.

Bharatnur S. Comparative study of abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy in non-descent cases. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;15(2):1528.

Dicker RC, Scally MJ, Greenspan JR, Layde PM, Ory HW, Maze JM, et al. Hysterectomy among women of reproductive age. Trends in the United States, 1970-1978. JAMA. 1982;248:323-7.

Ray RN, Roy S, Kalpahar S, Ghosh C, Das P. Comparative study of non-descent vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal hysterectomy in relation with morbidity and outcome in dysfunctional uterine bleeding patients. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(3):327-33.

Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods of hysterectomy: a randomized, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG. 2000;107:1380-5.