DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20161673

Comparison of injection drotaverine and injection valethamate bromide on duration and course of labor

Pradnya Rajendra Changede

Abstract


Background: Numerous drugs have been used to shorten the active phase of labor. How rationale is it to use these drugs to shorten the active phase of labor? Do they really shorten the duration of labor? What adverse effects do they have on the baby and the mother? These questions were the basis to perform the present study of comparing two of such drugs, injection drotaverine and injection Valethamate bromide with control subjects.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted in a tertiary center over a span of 2 years. 120 patients were enrolled in the study group. These patients were randomly allotted in 3 groups: a. 60 patients (30 primigravida and 30 multigravida) - control group (no drug given), b. 30 patients (15 primigravida and 15 multigravida) - drotaverine (DROTIN) group, c. 30 patients (15 primigravida and 15 multigravida) - valethamate bromide (EPIDOSIN) group. A statistical test, ‘unpaired t test’, was used to test the results for statistical significance. A x2 (chi square) test was used to test results of side effects for statistical significance.

Results: The mean duration of active phase of first stage of labor was significantly shorter in the drotaverine and valethamate bromide groups as compared to control group in both primigravida and multigravida patients. Conclusions: The rate of cervical dilatation under the influence of valethamate bromide and drotaverine is significantly higher as compared to control group. In each group dilatation was faster in multigravida patients as compared to primigravida and it was fastest in the drotaverine group.


Keywords


Labor, Drotaverine, Valethamate Bromide

Full Text:

PDF

References


O’Driscoll K, Stronge JM, Minogue M. Active management of labor, British Medical Journal. 1973;3:135-8.

Batukan AC, Özgün MT, Türkyılmaz C. The effect of valethamate bromide in acceleration of labor: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association. 2006;7(3):202-5.

Kaur D, Kaur R. Comparison of Drotaverine and Epidosin in first stage of labor, Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology India. 2003;53(5):449-52.

Tabassum S, Afridi B, Aman Z. Phloroglucinol for Acceleration of Labor: Double blind, randomized controlled trial, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2005;55(7):270-3.

Kuruvila S, Jasper P, Peedicayil A. A randomized controlled trial of valethamate bromide in acceleration of labor, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 1992;38(2):93-6.

Goswami B, Sarkar M., Biswas B. Efficacy of drotaverine and valethamate bromide in active management of labor, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2000;70(3):37.

Demeter J, Blasko S, The effect of intramuscularly administered drotaverine on the dilatation stage of uncomplicated deliveries, Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1998;3:723-37.

Khosla AH, Bala I, Dahiya K. A comparative study of the efficacy of Valethamate bromide with Drotaverine in normal labor, Journal Obstetrics and Gynecology India. 2003;53(6):568-70.

Thapa M, Saha R, Pradhan A. Effectiveness of drotaverine hydrochloride in progression of labor, Nepal Journal Obstetrics Gynecology. 2007;2(2):9-11.

Roy A, Patra KK, Mukhopadhyay S, et al. Study of drotaverine on first stage of labor and pregnancy outcome. S J Indian Med Assoc. 2007;105(8):450-2.

Singh KC, Jain P, Goel N. Drotaverine hydrochloride for augmentation of labor, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics 2004;84(1):17-22.

Sharma JB, Pundir P, Kumar A. Drotaverine hydrochloride vs. valethamate bromide in acceleration of labor. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2001;74(3):255-60.